When the Illinois Supreme Court issued their pension ruling last Friday it unanimously ruled on three basic principles.
1. Any change that reduces or impairs the pension
benefits of current and retired members of the state’s pension systems is
constitutionally impermissible.
2. The state’s claim that it retains police powers to
ignore the constitution has no basis in law.
3. The state has clear alternatives to reducing
constitutionally protected benefits, including raising revenue.
Rather than abide by the ruling of the court, Senate
President John Cullerton has brought Senate Bill 2404 back from the dead. Before
it turned into a Zombie, Senate Bill 2404 was the alternative pension bill that
the state’s public employee unions negotiated with Cullerton.
If passed, the bill would have significantly reduced the
benefits of both active and retired teachers. The union leadership believed it
was better than nothing. Nothing being Michael Madigan’s Senate Bill 1. And
Cullerton thought it had a better chance of surviving a court challenge.
Those of us who have been activists, advocates and
bloggers on the topic of Illinois pensions never agreed with our union
leadership about this compromise. We believed that any compromise on the legal
and moral obligation of the state to pay what was owed to its workers would
open the flood gates and threaten every citizen who did not have connections
and access to power.
And the Illinois Supreme Court agreed with us:
“It is not merely pension benefits of public employees that would be in
jeopardy” Justice Karmeier wrote.
“No rights or property would be safe from the State. The legislature could do whatever
it felt it needed to do under the circumstances. And more than that, through
its funding decisions, it could create the very emergency used to justify its
suspension of the rights conferred and protected by the constitution.”
I keep that paragraph on a piece of paper in my wallet
right next to my senior Ventra card. Yet, prior to the Court’s decision our
leaders were frightened. They were not sure what the courts would decide. They
felt it was a safer route to bargain away some of our rights rather than
risk losing them all. There were those who asked, “How can you blame them?”
These are difficult times for working people. Even if we
didn’t agree, who among us couldn’t at least understand the timidity of
the union leadership in the face of powerful political leaders like Madigan,
Cullerton and Quinn. Not to mention the fact that there were others waiting in
the wings with even a more draconian agenda than Madigan’s.
In the end, it didn’t matter. The union-Cullerton
compromise SB 2404 never came to a vote in the House and Madigan’s bill
passed in both Houses of the General Assembly and was signed by Governor Pat
Quinn.
At the last IEA Representative Assembly just prior to the
Court’s ruling, we asked the IEA leadership and the RA delegates to guarantee
to union members that if the Court ruled for us that they would not then
bargain away what we had won. Following the IEA’s General Counsel’s absurd
statement from the podium that such a guarantee would force the IEA to withdraw
from the state coalition of labor unions, the motion was defeated.
We would get no such guarantee.
That is what causes some concern this morning from IEA
members now that Senate President Cullerton has resurrected SB 2404 from the
dead. We have no assurances that the desire of the IEA and other union leaders
to be at the table will not lead them to bargain away what we have won in court
at great cost.
I do not think we should be distracted. Of course,
we should urge our leaders to reject Cullerton’s proposal of promises he
cannot deliver in exchange for promises he cannot keep. Instead we need to make
clear to our friends and neighbors that pension benefits were not and are not
the cause of the budget crises in Illinois.
The failure of the state to raise enough money to pay its
bills and provide for its citizens rests squarely on the shoulders of the rich
and the wealthy who care less about the common good so long as it requires
removing a dime from their pockets.
For someone like the demonic Elaine Nekritz to blame a
retiree whose pension averages less than $50,000 with no Social Security for
the state’s hungry children is without common decency. For Democratic and
Republican politicians to blame retirees for budget shortfalls at a time of an
ever-increasing economic gap between the rich and the working people of the
state is without conscience.
To hell with Cullerton’s compromises and lawlessness.
Thanks Fred and Glen. I have no faith in the IEA leadership to stand firm on any future pension legislation. I was extremely disappointed at their willingness to accept Cullertons plan a couple years ago and I hoped that the Supreme Court decision would embolden our leadership to reject any legislation that impairs or diminishes our obviously constitutionally protected pensions. Apparently they are weak. What am I paying for?
ReplyDelete