Thursday, November 12, 2026

The Enemy at Home

Power does not rest in the Congress. It does not rest in the courts. It does not even rest in the imperial presidency. It rests in the hands of Wall Street financiers, Silicon Valley, private equity firms, the fossil fuel industry, the predatory health care and pharmaceutical giants, agribusinesses and, most of all, the war industry.

No mainstream politician, including Bernie Sanders, dares utter a word against our entrenched militarism. If you do, you end up like Ralph Nader, who was turned into a pariah by a compliant media and our corporate-indentured political parties. Nader spoke the truth. He paid for his honesty.

We are about to witness the largest increase in war spending in American history with a proposed $1.5 trillion budget. The average taxpayer already shells out over $4,000 a year to the war industry as consumer and environmental agencies are dismantled, health care and education are defunded and programs such as Medicaid and food stamps (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) are slashed.

The new Pentagon budget will hand $58.5 billion to artificial intelligence and military command-and-control centers and see the effective merging of the United States and Israeli military industrial complexes. Seventy-four percent of the increase in the proposed $1.5 trillion budget will go to private contractors, including those who are building massive data centers on military bases.

None of this is good for us or good for the planet. The Pentagon, powered by the fossil fuel industry, is the world’s largest institutional polluter, emitting an estimated 66 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2024.

Americans, meanwhile, struggle with rising prices — nearly 30 percent of people go into debt to buy groceries. An estimated114,174. Americans die each year due to lack of health insurance or inadequate health care while a single-payer universal health care system could cover every American, save more than 100,000 lives a year, and reduce annual health expenditures by $1.04 trillion, or nearly 20 percent. Twenty-five percent of Americans are functionally unemployed. The minimum wage remains frozen, despite Democratic Party promises to raise it, at $ 7.25 an hour.

The elites use war not only for personal enrichment, but to stifle class conflict.

War, as W.E.B. Du Bois said, diverts the poor from their real interests. It funnels national frustrations into the “heroic” battle against a common enemy. The nationalist cant, with its endemic racism, seduces those who are alienated or on the margins of society into feeling they suddenly belong. It entices them to sacrifice themselves for a “noble” cause. They become the architects of their own enslavement. They march like sheep into war’s purgatory.

By the time they wake up, it is too late. They are cast aside, as so many of our veterans have painfully discovered, like human refuse. But as a tactic to consolidate power and enrich the billionaire class, it is unbeatable.

Wars will only be curtailed, if not halted, when we nationalize the weapons industry and dramatically reduce the military budget. Until then, nothing, absolutely nothing, will change. Indeed, things will only get worse. No one in Congress — or any other branch of government — will do this for us.

The masters of war sitting in the boardrooms of Boeing, General Dynamics or Northrop Grumman are not praying for peace in the Middle East or coexistence with China and Russia. The generals — who build their careers by orchestrating wars and post military careers enriching themselves working for defense contractors — are not seeking a cessation of global conflicts. They are seeking hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars and government debt to fuel the self-defeating cycle of endless war.

The corporate vultures — especially the war makers — are, as I write, descending on Congress. They are meeting with Democratic Party leaders and holding out promises of millions in cash. They will corrupt, neutralize and compromise most. They will destroy the careers of the very few who refuse to do their bidding.

They hold the real power. They have no intention of surrendering it. The manufacturing of weapons systems and the waging of war are the chief activities of the U.S. government. It is no longer one among other means of advancing the national interest. War and violence are how we speak to the rest of the world.

The “shadow world,” — as the author Andrew Feinstein calls it in his book on the global arms trade — is defined by staggering levels of corruption, deception and senseless death. It is lawless and unregulated. Its criminal activities, cannibalization of national budgets and secrecy are sanctified in the name of “national security.”

Lockheed Martin, RTX (formerly Raytheon Technologies), Boeing, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems, Leonardo, Airbus, Rheinmetall and ThyssenKrupp, along with Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Palantir, Goldman Sachs, Citibank and Exxon, are the state.

We, including our political class, are the vassals. The voters can send whoever they want to Congress, but until these corporations and the billionaire class are regulated, taxed and controlled, until their vast monopolies are broken up, until we stop squandering half of all discretionary spending on war, nothing will change.

Nothing.

Civilizations, as the historian Arnold J. Toynbee argued, “die from suicide, not by murder.” They are disemboweled by an uncontrollable and unaccountable military that drains state budgets and plunges dying empires into one military debacle after the next. These decaying civilizations finally collapse from within.

This is where we are headed. The corporations, and the billionaires who run them, buy and trade politicians, academics and journalists like Pokémon cards. Their lobbyists write the legislation. They own the media. They have stifled the academy, shutting down free speech and purging critics. Judges offer them unlimited power. To defy them — and I speak from personal experience — is to be cast into the wilderness.

The military-industrial complex, as Karl Liebknecht said of German imperialists on the eve of World War I, is the enemy within. “Making a Killing: How the West Profits from Slaughter in Gaza and Yemen,” co-authored by Andrew Feinstein, Ruth Rohde and Jack Cinamon — with contributions from Paul Holden and Professor Anna Stavrianakis — examines the global arms trade in the Middle East.

The authors estimate that $130 billion was made from arms exports by Western nations to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates during the war on Yemen and over $50 billion from Israeli foreign military procurements.

“RTX Chairman and CEO Christopher T. Calio made $18 million in 2024, after being appointed halfway through the year, while his compensation package surged to almost $25 million in 2025,” the authors note. “His predecessor, Gregory Hayes, was remunerated to the tune of nearly $22 million in 2023. Lockheed Martin CEO and former U.S. Air Force pilot Jim Taiclet, who was deployed in Saudi Arabia while serving during the Gulf War, earns an annual package of more than $23 million. Since his appointment in 2020 he has raked in more than $136 million in total Lockheed Martin compensation.”

Phebe Novakovic, the CEO of General Dynamics, has a net worth estimated at $420 million, up $270 million since 2020. But it is not only the CEOs who profit. Members of Congress and their families traded between $24 million and $113 million worth of Pentagon contractor stocks in 2024.

Representative Josh Gottheimer from New Jersey — a Democrat — is a former Clinton speechwriter and a close ally of House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. Gottheimer, who is heavily funded by the pro-Israel lobby and an ardent Zionist, traded $22 million worth of stock in the top 100 Pentagon contractors, including Microsoft — which received $414 million from the Department of Defense in 2023 for software and cloud computing services — Northrop Grumman and IBM.

Gottheimer serves on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Financial Services Committee. He is well placed to know which defense companies are enriched by government contracts and which are not.

Former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is not any better. She made an estimated $38.6 million profit in one year from her stock trading, the most of any lawmaker, in 2024. These politicians run the Democratic Party. They carry out the same illegal insider trading and have the same conflicts of interest as the Republicans and the Trump White House. Hunter Biden is no less odious than Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.

“Honeywell — which provides sensors and guiding devices to assist the Israeli military in airstrikes in Gaza — is the most commonly held arms company stock among members of Congress, followed by RTX, the company that makes missiles for Israel’s Iron Dome, among other weapons systems,” the authors write.

Members of Congress, they report, “made more than 13,300 trades totaling over $635 million in 2025.” The arms trade, the authors illustrate, has created an unelected, shadowy cabal of foreign policy, corporate and military officials, along with academics, who — no matter who is in the White House or the Congress — feed the military beast.

This cabal, many parked in think tanks funded by the defense industry and given prominent platforms on cable news channels, preach endless war. They ensure the fabrication of bombs, missiles, warplanes, drones, ships, tanks and guns. They ship these weapons around the globe. They sustain the interconnected network of cutting-edge, high-tech systems of information warfare and surveillance, powered by data processing centers, cloud technologies and artificial intelligence.

Once these weapons and tools of surveillance are tested on Palestinians or Yemenis, they are brought back to manage and surveil us — an imperial boomerang abolishing what is left of our civil liberties and freedom.

The tyranny empire imposes on others, as Thucydides reminded us, it finally imposes on itself. The choice, as Rosa Luxemburg pointed out, is socialism or barbarism. If we do not dismantle global capitalism, if we do not free ourselves from the tentacles of the war industry, we will descend into the Hobbesian world of totalitarian capitalism, failed states, mass migrations, endless war, ecocide and permanent immiseration.

The genocide in Gaza is the harbinger of this coming dystopia. It is a stark message by the industrialized nations to the Global South, especially with the breakdown of the climate. The message is this:

There are no rules. International Humanitarian Law is dead. The strong will annihilate the weak. We control the world’s resources and most of its wealth. We will not relinquish it. Your suffering and lives are meaningless to us. Defy us and you too will be slaughtered.

Fear is the only language these vampires understand. This is a dark fact about human nature. It is why Richard Nixon was our last liberal president. Nixon was not a liberal. He was devoid of empathy. He lacked a conscience. But he was scared of movements. He knew the power of the strike.

It is not our job to take power. It is our job to create radical movements to hold power in check. Without these movements, we are doomed.

“You get freedom by letting your enemy know that you’ll do anything to get your freedom; then you’ll get it,” Malcolm X told young civil rights activists from Mississippi 51 days before his assassination on February 21, 1965. “When you get that kind of attitude, they’ll label you as a ‘crazy Negro,’ or they’ll call you a ‘crazy nigger’ — they don’t say Negro. Or they’ll call you an extremist or a subversive, or seditious, or a red, or a radical. But when you stay radical long enough, and get enough people to be like you, you’ll get your freedom…So don’t you run around here trying to make friends with somebody who’s depriving you of your rights. They’re not your friends, no, they’re your enemies. Treat them like that and fight them, and you’ll get your freedom; and after you get your freedom, your enemy will respect you. And I say that with no hate. I don’t have hate in me. I have no hate at all. I don’t have any hate. I’ve got some sense. I’m not going to let anybody who hates me tell me to love him.”

The disease of permanent war and militarism is devouring the guts of our nation. These forces snuff out democracy. They turn culture into nationalist cant and sentimental kitsch. They turn education and the media into echo chambers for the rich and the powerful. They wreck the economy. They immiserate the citizenry. They pump toxins into the air, soil and water. They strip us of our liberty. They foster moral nihilism.

War is the apotheosis of this corporate rule, designed to exploit people and the natural world until exhaustion or collapse. And time is running out. If we don’t transform this system we, and most other species, will go extinct. Literally. We must mobilize to defeat these forces. This means organized mass disruptions of government and commerce as we have seen in France, Spain and India, and with organizations such as Palestine Action and Just Stop Oil.

If we remain supplicants, if we hope desperately for a feckless political class to save us, the barbarians will triumph.

-Chris Hedges

 

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

"He doesn’t care if he kills us all": Psychologist warns Trump is about to "act out"

Following the midterm blowout for the Republican Party that has been viewed as a referendum on Donald Trump’s second term, the president has entered the “third act” of his political career and is more dangerous than ever.

That’s the warning from Dr. John Gartner, a psychologist, former Johns Hopkins University professor and frequent Trump critic, who told the Daily Beast’s Joanna Coles that the president likely took the GOP’s defeat personally.

“Hell, hath no fury like a malignant narcissist scorned,” Gartner said. “I think we’re now in the third act of the tragedy, and I think we’re in more danger now than we’ve ever been.”

According to the Daily Beast, Gartner believes the 80-year-old president may now be even more inclined to wreak havoc. “He’s going to act out in the ways that are destructive—to show his power and dominance, and to gain the sadistic sense of pleasure that he gets from destruction,” Gartner said.

He compared the moment to a dangerous stage in an abusive relationship.

“I feel like we’re at the stage where a woman who’s been abused goes, ‘Thank God. I kicked him out of the house, I have a restraining order, I’m finally safe,’” he said. “And that’s often the time when the really destructive abusers say, ‘Okay, now I’m gonna kill the b---h.’ I think that he is that guy, and we are the b---h. And he doesn’t care if he kills us all.”

Gartner admitted he doesn’t have much advice to offer on how to deal with the impulsive president because he doesn’t believe “anyone can contain him.”

“I don’t think there is a strategy that will work,” he told Coles. “I think that he is going to do what he is going to do, and he’s going to reap maximum chaos, maximum destruction, maximum confusion.”

He warned that Democrats’ victory celebrations may be short-lived. “We’re so elated that Democrats have taken both houses of Congress, but I think he’s going to be successful over the next two years at stymying virtually every effort that they make,” he said.

Gartner argued Democrats will have little leverage because Trump has no agenda he needs them for. “Any bill that they pass that could help America is a bill he wants to thwart. That’s how his psychology works,” he said. “He doesn’t care if shutting down the government hurts the country. Look, he didn’t care that his actions hurt his party, right? He could care less.”

“At no point did he ever think maybe I should change my behavior because it’s gonna hurt my party,” Gartner concluded. “He doesn’t care about his party or his country or anyone else.”

-Tom Boggioni, NewsBreak


Trump plans imperial final act to his presidency

 


Donald Trump, with the clock ticking and congressional investigators closing in, plans to govern even more imperially, hell-bent on stretching executive power, targeting those on his enemies list, pardoning allies, and daring the courts and Congress to slow him down.

Why it matters: Trump and his allies are exploring executive action on new tariffs and immigration restrictions and asserting greater control over spending. 

On X over the weekend, Trump discussed targeting and perhaps jailing Democrats who investigate administration officials. He claimed politically motivated harassment.

Trump is retooling his White House by elevating the one official who's synonymous with his all-gas-no-brakes style: Stephen Miller, who took over for Susie Wiles as White House chief of staff on Monday.


Watch Miller and Russ Vought, the White House budget director, to understand how this approach will unfold. Both are architects and advocates of vastly expanding presidential power, believing there are virtually no restraints on what Trump can do as president.

The Swamp can expect tougher sledding: Miller, unlike most of his predecessors, is driven more by ideology than by meetings with lobbyists or industry groups. "Stephen gives zero f*cks what K Street thinks," a Trump confidant told us.

Between the lines: Midterm losses pushed Presidents Clinton and Obama to the center. Trump's instincts are the opposite: Assert maximal power. 

The playbook:

Restore MAGA. Two years ago, MAGA — mostly its network of podcasts, YouTubers and online activists — was a powerful, united force in media and politics. Today it's a hot, divided mess. Trump's attention to his base drifted. Now Vice President Vance and Miller desperately want to rebuild and rev up MAGA. That's why ending the Iran war, curtailing aid to Israel and pushing harder on RFK Jr.'s MAHA agenda are suddenly top-tier topics.

Rule by pen. Miller, Vought and White House lawyers have been drafting executive actions to govern without Congress, with Justice Department opinions ready to defend them, Reuters reported just before the election. 

Remember: Vought was an architect of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 blueprint for maximizing executive power in Trump II.

Target enemies. Before, it was pure payback. Now, it's also a preemptive warning that the Trump administration will target anyone, including elected members of Congress who target them. Trump ally Roger Stone told us: "Many Democrat lawmakers are going to find themselves under indictment and fighting conviction. Watch."

Purge the "deep state." The Supreme Court's ruling in a case about independent agencies, Trump v. Slaughter, widened the president's power to remove officials. 

"The Slaughter case gives the president tremendous powers," Trump said in an Election Day phone interview with CBS News' Robert Costa. The June ruling handed Trump the power to fire the heads of the FTC and other independent regulators (like FERC) for any reason or no reason.

More monuments. Trump's pharaonic need to gild the White House, build a ballroom, erect a triumphal arch and slap his name on buildings is also an exercise in raw power. 

He told New York Magazine's Ben Terris why he's honoring himself: "Nobody will do it once I'm gone. When I leave here, nobody will." No one can stop him.

The Republican resistance: Expect very little inside the new Congress. 

The reason: Most of Trump's Capitol Hill critics are gone. What's left is a much smaller, but more Trumpian, band of middle-aged and older white Republicans with margins too small to matter much.

The Trump bet: Congressional Republicans will quickly feel Democrats are overreaching and unify in solidarity with Trump, even if it's forced or begrudging.

Yes, but: One of Trump's most predictable attributes is his unpredictability. He said on election night that he'll "work together" with Democrats. What that may look like (with a heavy emphasis on "may"), based on reporting by Axios' Marc Caputo:

-Soften aspects of immigration enforcement, particularly regarding masked agents harassing U.S. citizens.

-Find common ground with MAHA's healthy food agenda, which has become the subject of vicious post-election infighting among Trump insiders.

-Sign legislation from the new Congress that would undo massive Medicaid cuts in his "One Big Beautiful Bill."

The bottom line: Trump is still Trump. He's 80 and it shows. But he meets force with force, and he'll go down swinging the more Democrats attack him. "Trump and his team are at our best when our backs are against the wall," one adviser told Caputo. "Trump comes out fighting. We're full-throated and full throttle."

-NewsBreak

Jim VandeHei, Mike Allen 


Monday, November 9, 2026

Trump sparks outrage with "wildly disrespectful" claim about troop casualties

 


Donald Trump outraged some political analysts on Sunday after he blurted out a false claim about military casualties in the Iran conflict. Speaking to reporters at the airport in West Palm Beach, Florida, Trump claimed no soldiers have been killed in the conflict, a claim that his own Department of Defense has refuted. In October, the Pentagon raised the official death toll in the Iran war to 23, Stars and Stripes reported.

"We won in Iran," Trump said. "It's just a matter of closing it out now. Maybe we'll wait. Some of their neighbors would prefer that we keep it the way that it is. Again, we haven't lost anybody. No soldiers," he added, comparing America's casualties in Iran with larger conflicts like the war of Russian aggression in Ukraine and the Vietnam War.

Trump's comments sparked a firestorm of criticism online. Nick Field, a politics writer, described the president's comments as "f------ horrible" in a post on X, reiterating the number of casualties that have been reported. Quentin Ocama, state outreach officer for the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, posted on X that Trump's claim was also "wildly disrespectful" to service members. 

"Wildly disrespectful of the service members who have been killed or injured in this clusterfuck of a conflict," he wrote. "Our crisis with a lack of serious and competent leadership continues…." Journalist Aaron Rupar described Trump's claims in a post on X as "lies."

-Robert Davis, NewsBreak

 

Sunday, November 8, 2026

Key Developments This Week in Ukraine

 


🕯️ A community mourns people who came for humanitarian aid. On November 2, Russian aerial bombs struck a former school serving as a humanitarian aid distribution point in Komyshuvakha, Zaporizhzhia Oblast. By November 7, the reported death toll had reached 55, with search operations continuing beneath the rubble.

⚡ Fresh attacks leave Kyiv struggling with electricity, water, and heat. Russia launched a major missile and drone attack overnight into November 7, damaging energy infrastructure, residential buildings, and Kyiv’s Northern Bridge. Substations connecting nuclear power generation in western Ukraine to Kyiv and central regions were hit. With colder weather arriving, the damage threatens more than lighting—it disrupts heating, water supplies, and everyday life for families already enduring repeated blackouts.

🛡️ Faster Russian drones are changing the battle in the skies. Ukraine’s Air Force reported that 137 of the 172 attack drones launched overnight into November 7 were jet powered. Ukrainian defenses intercepted 117 of those faster drones, according to the military. The figures show both the growing threat and the work being done to counter it.

🇺🇦 Ukrainian defenders push back near Lyman and Kostyantynivka. Fighting continued around the eastern cities Russia is trying to capture. In its November 6 assessment, the Institute for the Study of War reported Ukrainian counterattacks southeast of Lyman and a recent Ukrainian advance in northwestern Kostyantynivka, supported by geolocated footage.

🎯 Ukraine targets the weapons used against its cities. Ukraine’s General Staff reported strikes on two Russian Iskander missile launchers and a Pantsir-S1 air-defense system in Bryansk Oblast between November 6 and 7. Separately, the military confirmed a Neptune missile strike on the Proton-Electrotex plant in Oryol, which it says produces components used in Russian missile systems.

💔 Children under occupation face pressure to surrender their identity. A November 5 report published by EU NEIGHBOURS east highlighted the growing militarization and assimilation of Ukrainian children in occupied territories. Drawing on testimony and the work of The Reckoning Project, it described schooling shaped around Russian state narratives, obedience, and hostility toward Ukrainian identity. The struggle to protect Ukraine’s future also means protecting children’s language, culture, and connection to their home.

Thank you for standing with Ukraine and for continuing to support our community. Behind every headline are people trying to keep their families safe, help their neighbors, and hold on to hope. Your solidarity helps keep their stories visible and reminds Ukrainians that they are not alone.

With Love, 💙💛
— Ukrainian Apparel

 

Saturday, November 7, 2026

Neil Young sues Trump campaign again for playing "Rockin' in the Free World" at rally

 


Rock veteran Neil Young has filed a $10m lawsuit against a fundraising committee that supports US President Donald Trump, citing "unauthorised" use of his 1989 song "Rockin' in the Free World."

The Canadian-American star alleges that the Trump 47 Committee infringed on his copyright when it played the song before Trump took the stage at a 12 October rally in Ohio. Playing the song amounts to an "unauthorised public performance", the lawsuit states. The singer-songwriter sued the Trump re-election campaign in 2020 over its use of the same song and "Devil's Sidewalk." Young said the parties settled the matter shortly thereafter.

The White House referred to the Republican National Committee, who the BBC has contacted for comment. Through his company Silver Fiddle Music, Young alleges that the song was played without a licence or Young's permission at a political event in Youngstown, Ohio on 12 October. In the US, music used at campaign rallies often requires a public performance licence for it to be played for an audience, even if a campaign has already purchased a legal copy of the recording.

According to US Congress, because sound recordings do not have a general public-performance right, permission is only needed from the musical-work copyright holders, which can be obtained directly from the copyright holders themselves or through performing rights organisations.

The five-page federal lawsuit says that Trump "was personally aware that a licence would be required to play the Song at rallies," and that Young "has not, and would not, grant the required licence." It also says the song has been played "numerous times at other rallies."

The Grammy Award winner, who has strongly opposed Trump's politics, characterises the song as "a blistering anthem that contrasts the hollow promises of American political rhetoric with the harsh realities faced by the poor, homeless and forgotten." Young says that the song is "the opposite of everything that Donald J Trump stands for."

In 2020, Young sued Trump's re-election campaign for copyright infringement over the same song, as well as "Devil's Sidewalk." The new lawsuit claims that the campaign, at the time, "asserted no defence and immediately settled shortly after it was served," promising to never use the song without permission again.

Young posted about the lawsuit on his website on Tuesday, thanking Trump for coming to so many of his shows in the 1980s and 1990s, but stopped short of allowing him to play his music. "I am sorry it came to this, but money and transactions are something you understand," he wrote.

Young, The Rolling Stones, Rihanna, Adele, REM and the estate of Prince have previously criticised Trump for using their music at campaign events.

-Nardine Saad, BBC