Friday, October 23, 2026

Coach Ben Johnson asked Cairo Santos If He Wanted the Opportunity

With about eight minutes left, Cairo Santos lined up for a 53-yard field goal that would have given the Bears a two-score lead. He missed. The ball hit the upright, announces couldn’t stop saying “doink” and the Patriots had life.

Fast forward a few minutes. The Bears have another chance to put the game away, but now the kick would be from 58 yards. Five yards farther than the one Santos had just missed. Longer than any field goal he’d made in his 13-year NFL career.

Coach Ben Johnson initially called for a punt. Then he asked if Santos wanted the opportunity. Santos didn’t hesitate. “I want it.” Johnson trusted him. His teammates trusted him. And more importantly, Santos trusted himself. He stepped up and drilled a 58-yard field goal right down the middle. Career long.

I woke up thinking how awesome that moment really was. Some pretty powerful lessons in those few minutes. First, confidence isn’t believing you’ll never fail. It’s believing in your ability to respond when you do.

Second, one mistake doesn’t erase years of preparation. Santos didn’t suddenly become a better kicker in those few minutes. He was the same guy who had just missed. The difference was that he refused to let his last attempt define his next one.

And finally, there’s a leadership lesson here that I love. Johnson could have played it safe. He could have let the previous miss influence his decision. Instead, he listened to his player and trusted him with an even bigger opportunity.

Think about how powerful that is. Having someone believe in you at a moment when it would be easy to question yourself. Whether you’re coaching athletes, leading employees, raising kids, or just trying to navigate life, people are going to miss sometimes. So are you.

The question is whether we create environments where mistakes become something to learn from or something to fear. And when your next opportunity comes, will you be willing to take it? Don’t let your last miss convince you that you’re incapable of making the next one. Sometimes the biggest moment of your career comes just minutes after one you’d rather forget.

Bear Down.

Justin M Boyd


Human Pandemic? Deadly Outbreak: A bird flu outbreak has been raging uncontrolled on a Utah mink farm for two months. Flu experts fear it could spark a devastating human pandemic



Federal officials brushed off the issue as Utah prioritized the fur industry’s interests. Little has been done to stop the spread of the virus and ensure it can’t spread to humans, a failure that experts called “irresponsible’’ and “astounding.”

Reporting Highlights:

Deadly Outbreak: A bird flu outbreak has been raging uncontrolled on a Utah mink farm for two months. Flu experts fear it could spark a devastating human pandemic.

Government Failures: State officials didn’t order the mink to be killed, which other countries with outbreaks have done. They are prioritizing the financial interests of the fur trade.

Silent Risks: Despite CDC guidance urging officials to monitor workers, they actively chose not to and declined to test workers — including one with a symptom experts said would warrant testing.

These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.

-ProPublica

Bird Flu Is Raging on a Mink Farm. It Could Spark a Human Pandemic, Experts Say, but Officials Won’t Act. — ProPublica



Thursday, October 22, 2026

"If We Burn, You Burn with Us": France’s Youth Ignite a Massive Revolt

 


PARIS — “Make sure you tell the Americans that trash cans aren’t the only things burning in France,” 16-year-old Ewen told Truthdig as protesters gathered on the Place de la République on Saturday. Tear gas canisters had been falling into the growing crowd for about an hour, and the teen struggled to make himself heard with his mask.

“Our future is burning, too,” Ewen added. Due to the repression and arrests by police, most protesters asked that only their first names be used.

In rapid succession, he listed everything he’d come to protest against: his rat-infested high school, the violent police repression of the student movement, but also the lack of hospital beds across the country, the cost of living, the saturated job market and the quickly forgotten fires that ravaged France this summer. During the country’s hottest summer on record this year, some 250,000 acres of forest burned...

Grabbing his three friends, Ewen then posed for a photo, holding up a sign that read: “If we burn, you burn with us!” “It’s a ‘Hunger Games’ reference,” Ewen explained, as though I were decidedly too ancient to get it on my own. “It means that we’re not just fighting for ourselves, but for you, too.”

Marine Champetier de Ribes, who teaches literature at a school in a Paris suburb, said she felt France’s youth had awakened something in the rest of society. “Us adults had collectively fallen into torpor,” she said. “They shook us out of it and reminded us all that we’re right to be angry.”

On Oct. 17, that torpor lifted in plain sight. Between 550,000 and 800,000 people marched across the country. Though much of the national and international coverage focused on the violence that marred the margins of Saturday’s protests, the lesson was elsewhere: In less than a month, the high schoolers’ movement managed to pull a tired, resigned country back into the streets. Students were joined by teachers, parents, doctors, nurses, lawyers, pensioners, Yellow Vests, farmers and firefighters in perhaps the most intersectional movement France has seen in decades.

“They write the rules, and we follow”

Champetier de Ribes, 34, and her colleagues across the education sector had been organizing for years but had been slowly losing steam. “No one was listening to us,” she lamented.

In her school alone, she cited “cockroach-infested walls, clogged toilets, rat droppings in the microwaves and boiling classrooms that have yet to cool down after this summer’s heat waves.” Champetier de Ribes said she has also been forced to fit 38 students into her 215-square-foot classroom, which never has enough chairs and desks: “I’ve had to insist that at least three of them be absent every week so I can teach the rest,” she said. Champetier de Ribes said teachers had become disillusioned. “We’d quite forgotten how to be angry, until, that is, our students began leading by example,” she said.

Starting on Sept. 17, high schoolers across the country began barricading their schools to demand better material conditions and equal education opportunities. The movement began in the Paris suburb of Créteil and it spread fast: By Oct. 1, the Interior Ministry reported that more than 1,000 of France’s 3,700 high schools had been affected, over 200 of them blockaded. 

The students’ demands are more specific than their critics let on: a 10-billion-euro investment plan for schools, and an end to Parcoursup, the national platform that manages university admissions, which is often compared to a “social sorting machine” and criticized for its lack of transparency.

They’re also asking for more teachers, Last year, students across France lost some 20 million hours worth of lessons because absent teachers were not replaced. The education shortfalls are a result of President Emmanuel Macron’s neoliberal approach to public education funding while simultaneously increasing defense spending.

Teachers, in turn, organized to support their pupils. “They write the rules and we follow,” Champetier de Ribes said. She and her colleagues created an Instagram account to share the students’ demands with a grown-up audience: “We have to speak their language,” she added with a laugh.

From the start, the movement was met with force. The government, which chose to label the movement not as a “school protest” but as “urban violence,” sent police riot squads directly into high schools and universities.

Eden, 14, had his jaw fractured and most of his teeth knocked after being struck in the face by a tear gas grenade in a Paris suburb, leaving him, according to his mother, barely able to eat through a straw in his hospital bed. A 15-year-old in the north had his hand torn off by a so-called anti-encirclement grenade. On Saturday, in the eastern town of Mulhouse, Maïssa, 17, was struck by a tear-gas canister and lost her left eye.

Some 6,773 minors have been taken into police custody since the protests began in mid-September. Complaints are currently being filed across the country for verbal and physical mistreatment of these high schoolers during their detention.

This level of violence gave teachers yet another cause for concern, Champetier de Ribes said. “We were, to put it plainly, terrified at the very idea of seeing our students face off with the police.” Five months pregnant, she herself cannot physically protect her students, as tear gas is highly toxic. But she did help her colleagues prepare emergency kits. Identified with a white armband, these teachers carry masks, saline solution, bandages, disinfectant, water and applesauce pouches, ready to assist their pupils should they need help.

“This generation shook us awake,” Champetier de Ribes said. “Now, we have to be there for them, and alongside them.”

Christophe, who teaches mathematics in a private Paris high school, joined the protest Saturday with a sign that read: “You should not have betrayed us. We’re here to take our future back.” He stated that, while his was not an underprivileged school, his students had nonetheless joined their peers on the street, demanding equality. “My students may not be the ones getting beat up, but they’re still children,” he said... . 

-Truthdig

'If We Burn, You Burn With Us': France’s Youth Ignite a Massive Revolt


Florida woman killed a cat, put its remains in a blender, and then drank them: Seriously!

A young Florida woman is accused of killing a neighborhood cat and then blending its organs to drink. ​Juliana Alyssa Brown captured the animal in May 2024 while her family was on vacation, according to an arrest affidavit obtained by The Independent. At first the 21-year-old tried to kill the cat by drowning it in a white trash bag, before stabbing it with a kitchen knife, the affidavit said. Pasco County Sheriff’s Office interviewed Brown earlier this month after a mandatory clinical reporter told them she had confessed to the killing.

“The defendant proceeded to admit to trying to kill the cat various ways over the course of several days,” the affidavit stated. “The defendant explained the cat was screaming in pain which caused her to become ‘sexually aroused’. “Ultimately the defendant was able to drown the cat in her bathroom. Following the cat’s death the defendant placed it in a refrigerator hiding it from family members. “The defendant admitted that she skinned the cat, dissected its organs, placed them in a blender and drank them.”

The accused told patrol deputies she decapitated the animal, keeping its head for several months by preserving it with alcohol, per the affidavit. Brown told cops she often fantasized about killing animals and had done so since she was three years old. The sheriff’s office said the suspect had given them photographs showing the cat alive and then skinned two days later, as well as the knife she claimed she used to kill the animal.

Brown was arrested on October 14, according to jail records, and has now been charged with one count of aggravated animal cruelty causing excessive pain or death. The sheriff’s office requested a high bond be set “due to an enhanced fear of public safety”. ​“I understand that cruelty to animals is often a precursor for individuals who go on to carry out mass attacks or acts of targeted violence against individuals,” a deputy wrote in the affidavit.

​Under Florida Statute 828.12(2), aggravated animal cruelty is a third-degree felony and punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000, The Herbst Firm says. Anyone convicted of the crime could also be required to undertake an anger management program or psychological counselling.

 -Owen Scott, The Independent 


Tuesday, October 20, 2026

HELP THEM, TRUMP!

 



Glory to Ukraine (Слава Україні!)

 


Across Ukraine, centuries of history live in golden-domed cathedrals, medieval city streets, ancient fortifications, and remarkable architectural treasures. These places tell the story of a nation and its people—and they are part of humanity’s shared cultural heritage.

Sadly, many of these treasures are now at risk.

🏛️ Ukraine’s cultural heritage is under attack. As of July 29, 2026, UNESCO had verified damage to 545 cultural sites across Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion began. These include religious buildings, historic structures, museums, monuments, libraries, and archaeological sites. Not all are UNESCO World Heritage Sites, but each represents a piece of Ukraine’s cultural history.

⛪ Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra have suffered damage. This remarkable World Heritage property in Kyiv represents nearly a thousand years of Ukrainian history, faith, and architecture. In June 2026, a Russian drone strike severely damaged the Dormition Cathedral within the Lavra complex, affecting its roof and structure. UNESCO has been working to support emergency stabilization and preservation efforts.

🏰 Odesa’s historic center has also been hit. Recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2023, Odesa’s historic center is celebrated for its distinctive architecture and rich cultural history. Russian attacks have damaged historic buildings and religious landmarks, including the Transfiguration Cathedral. UNESCO has sent experts to assess the damage and support restoration efforts.

🏘️ Lviv’s historic heritage faces threats, too. The historic city center is renowned for its architectural layers and cultural influences. Russian attacks have caused damage to historic buildings in the city and its surrounding heritage areas, highlighting the risks facing Ukraine’s architectural legacy.

🌍 Why does this matter to the world? UNESCO World Heritage Sites are recognized for their outstanding universal value. They belong not only to the countries where they stand but also to the cultural inheritance of humanity. When a historic cathedral, museum, or centuries-old building is damaged, the loss extends beyond bricks and stone. It threatens the stories, craftsmanship, traditions, and memories passed down through generations.

💙💛 Preserving Ukraine’s heritage means preserving its identity. Ukrainians continue to protect their museums, document damaged monuments, rescue cultural collections, and work to restore what has been lost. Their determination shows that defending a country also means defending its history and culture.

At Ukrainian Apparel, we believe that supporting Ukraine means more than wearing its colors. It means learning about its history, celebrating its culture, and helping keep its stories alive.

Every design is an opportunity to share a story, celebrate Ukrainian identity, and connect people around the world with Ukraine’s heritage.

Thank you for standing with Ukraine and helping keep its history alive.

With Love, 💙💛
— Ukrainian Apparel

 

"Trump is openly embracing Putin and is working to destroy the strongest and most successful alliance in human history..."

 


It was exactly ten years ago that then–Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told the American people that Russian president Vladimir Putin hoped to have a “puppet” in the White House, and that Donald Trump was that puppet.

A scowling Trump responded: “No puppet. No puppet.”

Clinton continued: “It’s pretty clear.

Trump interjected: “You’re the puppet.”

Clinton continued: “It’s pretty clear you won’t admit…”

Trump interjected: “No, you’re the puppet.”

Clinton: “...that the Russians have engaged in cyberattacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people, that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him because he has a very clear favorite in this race.”

Trump shook his head disparagingly.

Ten years later, Trump is openly embracing Putin and is working to destroy the strongest and most successful alliance in human history to cement that partnership, apparently with an eye to enriching himself.

And so, the events of the present change the way we see the past. Had Trump strongly supported Ukraine as Congress has demanded, and stood firm against Russia, a country that is, after all, a minor economic player whose military is flailing at its attempt to absorb its neighbor, we would rightly dismiss Clinton’s warning as campaign hyperbole. As it is, though, Trump’s tie to Putin—the story he has always tried to bury by calling it the “Russia, Russia, Russia hoax”—seems likely to emerge as the central story of the Trump years.

As Clinton wrote today: “In just the last few days: Trump made a deal for the U.S. to buy Russian diesel, an economic lifeline for Putin; he and Elon Musk blamed each other for an order that slowed down Starlink satellite connectivity over Ukraine, hampering the country’s defenses during a devastating Russian attack; and Trump waived sanctions on Russia that Congress, led by his late friend Lindsey Graham, had pushed for. Now, Putin has proposed a summit with Trump and Xi to decide Ukraine’s fate for them, bulldoze a century of international cooperation, and frame Russia as an equal to the U.S. and China. We’ll see if Putin’s puppet continues to dance on his strings.”

Second, as no one paying even a modicum of attention can have missed, Trump is so unpopular that support for Republicans has fallen into historically low numbers. The gutting of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), tariffs that have destroyed markets for agricultural products and increased prices, the war on Iran that has sent prices of gasoline and especially diesel soaring and thus increased the cost of everything that travels by train or truck, the blatant corruption that is lining the pockets of Trump and his cronies while ordinary Americans can’t make ends meet, and now Trump’s open embrace of Russian president Vladimir Putin—all wildly unpopular positions—mean that the districts that were firmly Republican by double digits just two years ago are now up for grabs.


That shift has revealed something interesting. Republicans running for office are refusing to hold town halls or to engage in debates with Democratic challengers. When they do show up, they tend to show how unserious they are about filling elected office, as Republican Dan Sullivan of Alaska illustrated when he asked the moderators at a debate with Democrat Mary Peltola if she had been given the questions beforehand because she seemed to be reading from notes while he didn’t know how to answer the questions. As the moderators quashed his allegation, Peltola noted: “I’m prepared!”

In the past, Republicans in safe Republican districts did not have to appeal to constituents or campaign, apparently because the letter “R” was enough to get voters to make a mark next to their name. In this new environment in which constituents are furious with Republican policies, Republicans hoping to be elected continue to keep their heads down, apparently hoping that they can be elected, or reelected, if they simply keep their mouths shut.

Their invisibility raises the question of why these people, who evidently don’t care about representing their constituents, would want to hold national office. Perhaps they want to hobble the federal government to enable wealthy businessmen to gain even more control over the country. Perhaps they want to enable the rise of a theocracy. Perhaps they are hoping to make money off their offices. Perhaps they simply want the prestige of a federal office.

But the extreme gerrymandering of states at the hands of Republican lawmakers that made their candidates shoo-ins in the past also means those Republican candidates are weak. New scrutiny of those candidates as Democrats challenges them is revealing just how weak they are.

In Texas, for example, Republicans are running Trump’s hand-picked candidate for the U.S. Senate, state attorney general Ken Paxton, a stunningly corrupt man who has recently been revealed to have spent New Year’s Eve 2024 partying in Dubai with a mistress and two men who are fugitives from U.S. law. In Kansas the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate is incumbent senator Roger Marshall, a man who has been revealed as having sued more than 700 of his obstetrical patients for unpaid bills, resulting in 81 arrests.

In North Carolina, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Michael Whatley has little to recommend him other than Trump’s endorsement; the same could be said of the Republican candidate for Senate from South Carolina, Darline Graham, whose main qualification is that she is former South Carolina senator Lindsey Graham’s sister. The story is the same across the country as Republicans field subpar candidates. Even in Maine, where Senator Susan Collins should have been a strong candidate for the party, stories of apparent corruption are undermining her candidacy.

As Paul Waldman noted in Public Notice on October 15, these stories and others are “just the Senate candidates. Up and down the ballot, the [Republican Party] has nominated crackpots and nitwits, none more colorful than Victor Marx, their nominee for governor in Colorado. Marx refuses to say how many people he has killed (though he says his stepfather forced him to commit his first murder at age 7), hunts demons, claims he can call in US airstrikes, and boasts of being a seventh-degree black belt in a martial art he invented. Normal stuff!”

In contrast to the Republicans hoping to coast to election, the Democrats running for office are holding town halls, listening to the people of their districts, needling their opponents who refuse to debate, and using the word “mission.”

The contrast between the two is a snapshot of a dying party that is no longer bothering to compete, and a rising party whose candidates are eager for the job and willing to work for it. It reminds me of the 1850s, when the Democrats, who were so accustomed to holding office that they assumed they were entitled to their posts, met the rising Republicans, whom Democrats considered too uncouth to hold office, but who ended up dominating the political system for the next seventy years.

—Heather Cox Richardson