I don’t want to depress everyone,
but I believe in being a realist. And it hasn’t been a great week in America.
Here’s just a partial list of things within the scope of our law/politics lens
that have happened:
- Trump’s Justice Department is on a revenge-fueled
spate of new activities. According to people who “could not publicly
discuss details of the investigation and spoke to The Associated Press
on Friday on the condition of anonymity,” Pam Bondi has assigned
Ed Martin, the failed DC-U.S. Attorney nominee who now works in Main
Justice (although he has no prior prosecutorial experience), to oversee
criminal mortgage fraud investigations into New York AG Tish James and
California Senator Adam Schiff.
- DOJ policy prohibits disclosing investigations,
except in very limited situations, for reasons we’ve discussed over the
years. The apparent use of anonymous cutouts to inform the public that two
Democratic political figures who have, coincidentally, tangled with Trump
are being investigated is a rank effort to tarnish their reputations. (And
so reminiscent of Trump, who has repeatedly asked for investigations to be
announced—for example, in his call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskyy that led to his first impeachment, or his request that DOJ
announce an investigation into voter fraud following the 2020 election so
he could take it from there.)
- If these cases were viable, you’d expect to see them
being investigated by the offices where alleged crimes occurred. DOJ also
seems to be investigating James’ investigation into Trump—the one that
resulted in his criminal convictions in New York state court. Her lawyer,
Abbe Lowell, called it “the most blatant and desperate example of this
administration carrying out the president’s political retribution
campaign.” Schiff’s attorney, Preet Bharara (who, full disclosure, I
co-host Cafe’s Insider Podcast with), attacked the
allegations against the Senator as “transparently false, stale, and long
debunked,” and called Martin “brazenly partisan.” None of this is normal.
- Usually, the government is extremely slow to respond
to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and frequently, the answer
is that the information is privileged and can’t be disclosed. So when
employees at American embassies in Denmark and Greenland were directed to
provide information that could be used in a FOIA request—including both
official and personal communications involving Donald
Trump’s crazy proposal that Greenland should become part of the U.S.,
Trump Jr.’s one-day visit to Greenland, and any communications containing
the name “Trump”—there was concern that some kind of loyalty purge
was underway. This is not normal.
- A 2-1 decision in the D.C. Circuit has deprived Judge
Boasberg of jurisdiction to proceed with his inquiry into whether Trump
administration officials should be held in criminal contempt for violating
his orders and sending 130 Venezuelan men to CECOT prison in El Salvador
in March. The two judges in the majority, Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao,
are both Trump appointees to a court that has long been a feeder court to
the U.S. Supreme Court. That decision could be reheard by the entire
circuit sitting en banc, or an appeal to SCOTUS could be
attempted.
- But for now, the contempt proceeding—this is the case
where the government’s best has been that they didn’t have to comply with
the Judge’s order because their planes were out of U.S. airspace before he
entered it in writing—will end without additional action against
government lawyers. The dissenting judge, Obama appointee Cornelia
Pillard, wrote that the majority’s decision was legally unjustified and “a
grave disservice” to Judge Boasberg, who the Trump administration
has gone after with an ethics complaint.
- Federal judges should not whitewash the government’s
disgraceful behavior in the case involving the deportees, unless they
intend to cede all the power of the Article III branch of government, the
judiciary, to the Article II branch, the presidency. It’s the judiciary’s
job to sanction any party that violates court orders, including the White
House, and if they won’t, there is no one else who can.
- Craziness in Texas continues, with the aggressive
political use of redistricting. Shortly after Texas Democratic state
legislators left the state for places like Illinois in hopes of denying
Republicans the opportunity to pass a plan that would gerrymander the
state’s congressional map and produce more Republican members of Congress
in the 2026 election, the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, went to court to try to remove some of
them from office.
- This is rank political maneuvering, from the
gerrymandering effort itself to the jostling over which Texas politician
can be the toughest on the Democrats. Paxton can’t decide if he hates
Democrat Beto O’Rourke or Republican Senator John Cornyn more. All of this
looks like a beauty pageant designed to see who can win Donald Trump’s
vote for a turn in the national limelight.
There is so much more. For one
thing, Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted child sexual predator, is in a prison camp
in a minimum-security environment instead of in prison where she belongs. Sex
offenders don’t qualify for these camp facilities, and it’s a slap in the face
to victims. The administration controls Maxwell’s conditions of confinement,
which means Donald Trump can decide where she is held. She’s learned the
lesson. Her improved circumstances are not only not normal for a sex offender,
but they violate Bureau of Prisons regulations. Her move would have required a
waiver from someone very high up in the Justice Department. No confirmation yet
on who that was. The bottom line is that this administration continues to cross
over red lines that signal a functioning democracy.
There’s a lot to keep track of
and, as we’ve discussed before, it can get overwhelming. Right now, it’s a full-time
job just trying to keep up with the headlines. We are doing our best here, and
we’ll continue to do that.
But it was jarring, given all the
news today, to walk through La Guardia airport where everything
felt…normal. We can lose this democracy if we don’t fight for it.
In order to resist what Trump is
doing in our country, you need to be informed; you need to know what’s at
stake. Even in a week like this one, when it’s gut-wrenching to try and take in
what the Trump administration is doing, it’s our duty to witness it, to share
what we learn with others, to resist, to refuse to give up.
We’ll keep doing that. We are not
fighting the fight to preserve democracy alone; we are doing it in the company
of other patriots—true patriots, not fake ones. Every small step we take
counts. Some weeks are going to be difficult and full of bad news, but other
weeks, if we persevere, will be ones where we make progress. Don’t give up.
In times like these, knowledge
truly is power. Subscribe to Civil Discourse and get clear,
reliable insight into the law and politics shaping our future—so you’re not in
the dark when it matters the most.
We’re in this together,
-Joyce Vance
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.