Trump & Andrew Liveris
In early 2017, almost immediately after taking office, Trump's first EPA overturned the agency's own determination to ban chlorpyrifos, the organophosphate pesticide we have every reason to believe caused Katherine's leukemia and subsequent relapses. Besides cancer, chlorpyrifos is also robustly tied to lower IQs and neurocognitive disorders.
Trump appointed Andrew Liveris,
the CEO of Dow, which manufactures chlorpyrifos, to a White House manufacturing
group after Dow wrote a $1 million
dollar check for Trump's first inauguration. Dow then pushed back against
all the scientific findings showing how dangerous chlorpyrifos is for our
children -- and for all of us. I have a cluster of autoimmune diseases that
emerged immediately after the acute exposures we believe killed Katherine.
Biden's EPA worked to try to
revoke its registration of chlorpyrifos, but those attempts were
repeatedly overturned
in court.
Despite the MAHA report very clearly identifying pesticides as part of the cause of the declining health of U.S. children, it mentions no cross-agency proposal to ban dangerous chemicals of any kind, nor do we in the field of Children's Environmental Health expect this administration will do so given massive amounts of corruption.
They have already pulled
back proposed bans on PFAS, pre-empting states from doing anything to
regulate them, even though those chemicals are highly implicated in the chronic
diseases MAHA purports to target. And these chronic conditions are increasingly
debilitating our children: "Over 40% of the roughly 73 million children
(aged 0-17) in the United States have at least one chronic health condition,
according to the CDC, such as asthma, allergies, obesity, autoimmune diseases,
or behavioral disorders."
A recent article
in Slate gave a very clear diagnosis of the report from a
pediatrician's perspective:
The MAHA Commission has
accidentally written a landmark conservative admission that the free market
doesn’t work in health care—that allowing corporations to operate without
regulation corrupts institutions and undermines children’s well-being.
Stunningly, rather than
embrace the obvious solution its data demand, the report pivots to blaming “the
overmedicalization of our kids.” That is, it claims that doctors like me and
our health care system at large are too focused on treating illness and not on
preventing it in the first place.
This is where the commission’s
logic completely breaks down. It has spent dozens of pages documenting how
corporate greed harms children, from selling them ultra-processed foods to
exposing them to chemical toxins, creating an environment that leads to obesity,
asthma, and other chronic illnesses. Then the group proposes solving this issue
by giving those same interests more power while scapegoating the doctors trying
to treat the resulting diseases of a system that prioritizes profit over
well-being.
I think this is exactly correct.
At a time of historic
corruption, while Trump is dismantling
the agencies trying to do something to protect human
health by cleaning up the environment, it would be the surprise of my life if
protections for children were at all strengthened. Most of us in Environmental
Public Health instead expect the meager protections we have to be utterly
gutted.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.