Trump:
Well, we’re going to have troops everywhere.
Reporter: What’s the bar for sending in the Marines?
Trump: The bar is what I think it is.
It
was around 2 a.m. on July 15, 2020, when Mark Pettibone, then 29, was walking home from a relatively calm
Black Lives Matter protest in downtown Portland. He hadn’t done anything more provocative than
wearing a black shirt; no slogans, no mask, no glimmers of violence. Yet
moments later, an unmarked minivan pulled up alongside him. Out jumped several armed men in camouflage, with no
insignia, slipped a bag over his head and kidnapped him.
“I was terrified,” Pettibone told reporters, his voice trembling with the memory. “It was like being preyed upon.” He was shoved into the van, blindfolded, driven to the federal courthouse, interrogated, and held — with no Miranda rights, no paperwork, no explanation — for nearly 90 minutes before being released without charge or citation.
No
uniforms, no accountability, no transparency, yet a citizen was stripped of his
rights and dignity in a blurry high-stakes operation. And around the same time
in Washington, DC, Trump was trying to talk General Mark Millie into having the
National Guard shoot at protesters in that city.
This was not some fringe vigilante action. It was federal agents wielding brute force under cover of Trump’s executive order, agents whose silence spoke louder than any badge. The ACLU of Oregon called it an unconstitutional kidnapping; legal scholars said probable cause was nowhere to be found. Yet Merrick Garland decided it wasn’t worth investigating or prosecuting. Let’s just move on. And so here we are.
As
Donald Trump this week levels attacks on Los Angeles — sending in federal
forces to “restore order” amid unrest provoked by ICE’s illegal tactics —
Portland’s secret‑police saga shouldn’t just echo, it should ring alarm bells.
If you thought that unmarked vans and invisible state power were confined to
dystopian fiction, Pettibone’s story proves they already stalk our cities.
Trump
and his neofascist sidekicks sending the National Guard into Los Angeles may look on the surface, like another “law and order” stunt from a man whose
political brand depends on hate and fear. But beneath the posturing lies
something far darker and far more dangerous to American democracy.
This is not even remotely about suppressing unrest. Instead, it’s about setting an unconstitutional, anti-democratic precedent: that the President of the United States can deploy military force on a whim, against his political enemies, without state or local consent. It’s about turning a democratic republic into an authoritarian stronghold. It’s about ending federalism — what political scientists and our Founders called our form of government — as we know it.
This
is a test and a dress rehearsal. If he gets away with it, he will probably use
this exact same formula — create a crisis worthy of television, bring in the
feds, declare a state of emergency — to accomplish what he really wants
to do.
For
example, suspending the 2026 election. Yeah, that. Otherwise, Democrats might
take the House and begin investigations of him that could lead to more
prosecutions and convictions for his various crimes. And there’s no way he’s
going to peacefully allow that.
For nearly 250 years, America has been guided by a simple democratic principle: that power flows from the people upward, not the other way around. When Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, he was unambiguous: “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”
We
elect our sheriffs, our mayors and city councils, our governors and
legislatures; those elections are our form of “consent.” They are closest to
us, most accountable, and best positioned to determine how and when to protect
public safety.
With
very few exceptions having to do with the Civil War, World War II, and the
defense of Civil Rights protestors, “keeping the order” through law enforcement
has always been handled at the most local level possible so the people whose
lives and daily activities are directly impacted have a say and can hold police
and the people guiding them accountable.
But
Trump has never cared for accountability. And now, like the autocrats he so
admires — Putin, Erdoğan, Orbán — he is showing us that he sees local
government not as a partner in governance, but as an obstacle to be crushed.
Let’s
be clear: sending the National Guard into Los Angeles, especially when done
over the objections of California’s governor and L.A.’s mayor, is a direct
assault on one of the foundational principles of American democracy: local
control.
This
is the classic blueprint for dictatorship — using federal military power to
override the will of elected local leaders — and it reflects the way fascism
has begun in nearly every nation that has lost their democracy over the past
century.
Even
more glaring proof that this isn’t about “law and order” is the simple reality
that Trump isn’t responding to a rebellion or foreign invasion. He’s
responding, instead, to protests against ICE arresting people without warrants,
a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment itself that says:
“The
right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.”
Trump
is attacking the very same protests that are explicitly protected by our
Constitution, reflecting the saying so often attributed to Voltaire (it
actually came from his biographer) that it’s become an all-America cliché: “I
may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it.”
As the First Amendment makes explicit: “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” That’s what makes this move so chilling. When a president treats constitutionally protected protest as insurrection and sends in federal troops over the objections of state and local elected officials, he’s not preserving order: he’s causing disorder and, in the process, destroying our democracy.
We’ve
seen this movie before; as mentioned, in 2020, Trump deployed federal agents in
unmarked military gear to Portland and D.C. They tear-gassed peaceful
demonstrators, beat and shot journalists, and abducted citizens off the
streets. Americans shrugged. The media called it “controversial.” Merrick
Garland decided other things were more important.
But
the lesson Trump took from it was simple: it worked. He faced no
consequences. The courts barely blinked and when Biden came into office Merrick
Garland looked the other way. So now Trump’s doing it again, only this time
bigger, bolder, and with clearer political intent.
Sending
the Guard to L.A. sends a message to every mayor and governor in the
country: If you oppose Trump, he can bring troops to your doorstep.
And it sends a message to every American: If you protest, if you
dissent, if you organize, you may one day be staring down the barrel of a gun
flown in on orders from Washington, DC.
This
is not hypothetical. It’s not alarmism. It’s a dry run for the eventual
suppression of all dissent that seriously threatens the Trump regime. Just like
in Russia, Hungary, or Turkey.
Deploying
the National Guard for political purposes chills the First Amendment. Giving
them the power to assault and arrest protestors breaks the Fourth Amendment. It
tells the American people: stay quiet, or the military might show up.
That’s not democracy; that’s authoritarianism in plain sight!
Yes, Title 10 gives the president the power to federalize the National Guard during times of invasion, insurrection, or to overcome obstacles to enforcing federal law. But Trump is taking it a step farther, giving Guard members the power to make arrests and point their guns at civilians, a clear and outrageous violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878 in response to the violations of civil rights being perpetrated on civilians by the military during the post-Civil War occupation of the South.
That
law explicitly forbids the military from turning their guns on civilians.
Nonetheless, Congresswoman Maxine Waters is now so concerned that she’s begging Guard troops not to shoot at protesters.
This should deeply shock every American.
As
California governor Newsom posted to Xitter:
“We
didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of
state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where
they’re actually needed.”
And
let’s not pretend this is about safety. The same man who praised the “very fine
people” who killed Heather Heyer when marching with torches in Charlottesville,
who pardoned violent insurrectionists and murderers on January 6, who
routinely echoes Hitler when he calls his political opponents “scum,”
“animals,” and “vermin” does not care about public peace. He cares about
control.
He
wants to exercise domination and revenge against anybody (like California
Governor Newsom) who dares stand up to him. And he’s now using federal armed
forces to flex his power to lord over the rest of us in ways that would make
our Founders puke…or revolt.
If
Trump is allowed to again normalize the use of federal troops against American
cities — particularly progressive cities that vote against him — it won’t stop
with Los Angeles. Tomorrow it’s Chicago. Next month, New York. Then
Seattle, Atlanta, Philadelphia. It becomes a pattern, then a doctrine: the
president as enforcer-in-chief, sending muscle into any jurisdiction that
refuses to obey.
That’s not federalism or anything remotely resembling law and order. That’s fascism. And it’s not “coming” or “on its way.” It’s here, now. And if he gets away with it, future presidents will do the same. The precedent — already weakly established here in Portland in 2020 — will be locked in. The checks and balances will have been destroyed. That’s assuming there even are elections in the future.
As
former Trump insider Lev Parnas said:
“According
to my sources, there are discussions happening right now—within Trump’s most
trusted circle—about invoking martial law if the protests ‘get out of hand.’
They’re looking for any excuse. Any video. Any act of violence. Any disruption. That’s all they
need to justify a crackdown.
“And
it gets worse. What I’m being told is that Trump allies—including elements
connected to Proud Boys, III Percenters, and other far-right militia
networks—are planning to infiltrate the June 14th protests. Not to
support them. To sabotage them. Their goal? Create chaos. Spark confrontation.
Trigger a response from law enforcement. And then hand Trump the justification
he needs to clamp down.”
America
is at a crossroads. We can pretend this is just another Trump stunt, something
to be laughed at or dismissed, or we can recognize it for what it is: a direct
assault on civilian government, an unconstitutional power grab, and a warning
shot at the heart of democracy.
It’s time to stop normalizing the abnormal. Troops in the streets of American cities should send chills down our spine, not shrugs across the airwaves or the pathetic cheerleading we see on the billionaire-owned Fox “News.” When a president uses the military against his own people to score political points, democracy itself becomes collateral damage.
And
if Trump gets away with this like he did here in Portland in 2020, every new
act of violence against the Constitution and people who disagree with him
(Hegseth is now threatening to deploy Marines) will become less scandalous,
more “normal,” and more likely to lead to the next crackdown.
And then the state of emergency. And then the suspension of elections. The time to speak out is now, not after Trump’s seized a dozen more cities and imprisoned thousands of us. Call your members of Congress, and I’ll see you in the streets next Saturday.
-Thom
Hartmann
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.