If you thought the Trump squad’s
deal to conditionally dismiss New York Mayor Eric Adams’s multiple corruption
charges in exchange for assistance in the lawless onslaught against immigrants
was a “corrupt bargain,” as many attorneys in the South District of New York
U.S. attorney’s office and Main Justice did, buckle up.
A potential, disgusting deal
between the Trump regime and Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted colleague of
Jeffrey Epstein, is gaining new attention. Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years for conspiracy to entice minors to travel to
engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors to participate in
illegal sex acts, transporting a minor to participate in illegal sex acts, sex
trafficking conspiracy, and sex trafficking of a minor.
In the midst of a firestorm that
Donald Trump can no longer contain regarding his refusal to release all
materials concerning Epstein and his clients, Deputy Attorney General Todd
Blanche (Trump’s former personal attorney) announced a meeting with Maxwell (whom Trump previously wished well).
Maxwell is currently appealing
her conviction. What could possibly be the basis for the number two person in
the Justice Department to meet with the woman at the center of the criminal
enterprise that now threatens to envelop Trump in a scandal like none other in
his sordid career? (Interestingly, Attorney General Pam Bondi, already the
object of scorn for her insistence that there is no “list” to release, has now
taken a back seat.)
The prospect for such a meeting
has set off alarm bells, even within the MAGA camp. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
(R-Ga.) actually got something right when she proposed that Maxwell could be “bartering for something.” Put more bluntly, Maxwell could
be making a deal to pardon or shorten her sentence in exchange for exonerating
Trump. This would be the height of corruption, raising the potential for
impeachment and/or criminal investigation.
It seems preposterous that
anyone would believe Maxwell’s possible exoneration of Trump after getting a
deal from the ethically compromised Justice Department. However, Trump may be
so desperate to persuade a segment of his most deluded cult members to let up
that he is willing to risk elevating the scandal.
So far, it seems to be
backfiring. On Tuesday, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) offered a motion in
the House Oversight and Government Reform committee to subpoena Maxwell. It
passed on a voice vote. Members of Congress will apparently be able to ask
questions about Epstein’s associate, her contact with the Trump Justice
Department, and the existence of documents. While she might assert her 5th Amendment
rights not to testify (so long as her case is on appeal), the questions posed
in and of themselves should be enlightening.
Moreover, the scandal has forced
the House to grind to a halt. “Republicans on the House Rules Committee
continue to oppose allowing any legislation to reach the House floor for a vote
this week,” the Washington Post reported. “That’s because they fear
Democrats will introduce amendments related to Epstein. Democrats on the panel
did so twice last week, and Republicans faced blowback from constituents and
the MAGA base for voting against releasing the files.” The GOP chair of the
committee said it might not meet again until September, and the House is set to
scurry out of town for recess on Wednesday.
The Blanche meeting, like all the
other attempts to divert attention (e.g., an appalling AI video showing President Obama’s arrest,
the release of Martin Luther King, Jr. files, demands that the Guardians and
Commanders revert to their previous names, and a threat to prosecute Trump
nemesis, California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff) is unlikely to quell the uproar.
While clueless, cynical legacy media practicing access
journalism might insist the issue is going away (or Trump, at
least, is gaining the upper hand), these developments show the opposite.
Trump is in a frenzy. Republicans
are no longer complacent about a coverup. The public overwhelmingly disapproves of his handling of the
scandal. Social media continues to stay on the case. And now the spectacle of
Maxwell’s testimony provides the opportunity for wall-to-wall coverage.
House members on both sides of
the aisle are irate with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who refused to move
forward with a vote to compel release of the documents. Rep. Tom Massie (R-Ky.) earned the ire of the Speaker
(and Trump) after he scolded Johnson: “Who’s he gonna pick? Is he going to
stand with the pedophiles and underage sex traffickers? Or is he gonna pick the
American people and justice for the victims? … It’s irrespective of what the
president wants.”
That comes close to the nub of
the issue: Will Republicans go along with a massive coverup, the sort of
corrupt self-protection racket that authoritarian leaders pull to defend
indefensible conduct? The issue now threatens Trump’s survival as
president—and, by extension, every Republican’s political career.
Once the MAGA GOP is seen as
the party that protects rich, creepy, abusive, elite men at the expense of
everyone else, they will be recognized for the villains they once claimed
Democrats to be. After all, a deep state cover-up of sexual predators who victimized
children should be the final straw for all but the most deluded Trump cultists.
The Contrarian is
reader-supported. To receive new posts and join our community of good
troublemakers, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.