…“Democracy must be defended at all costs, for democracy
makes all this possible,” former President Joe Biden said in
a 2021 Memorial Day speech at Arlington National Cemetery. “Democracy — that’s
the soul of America, and I believe it’s a soul worth fighting for, and so do
you; a soul worth dying for. Heroes who lie in eternal peace in this beautiful
place, this sacred place, they believed that, too.”
Throughout his presidency, Biden spoke out on the growing
threat to democracy not just at home but also worldwide. After his remarks about
this in 2023, the Atlantic Council’s John E. Herbst called it a “bravura
moment.”
It’s difficult to imagine President Donald Trump saying
or deeply believing these things, given his history of trashing U.S.
prisoners of war (“I like people who weren’t captured”) and praising authoritarian
leaders.
But that doesn’t mean the dangers to democracy are only
coming from the right. “Today’s political violence is occurring across the
political spectrum — and there is a corresponding rise in public support for it
on both the right and the left,” Robert A. Pape, director of the Chicago
Project on Security and Threats, wrote in
the New York Times last year. “The political goal that matters most,” he added,
“is what has always been the driving force in America’s democracy: free
elections — free from intimidation and interference — and the freedom of
elected leaders to legally enact the people’s will.”
In September, the Center for Strategic and International
Studies said 2025
marked “the first time in more than 30 years that left-wing terrorist attacks
outnumber those from the violent far right.” And the Foundation for Individual
Rights and Expression (FIRE) reports that:
“Those students who are the furthest to the left have
been the
most accepting of violence for as long as we’ve asked the question.
That includes very liberal and democratic socialist students. But a rising tide
of acceptance of violence has raised all boats. Now, regardless of party or
ideology, students across the board are more open to violence as a way to shut
down a speaker… Violence is antithetical to free speech, and political violence
is wholly incompatible with — and toxic to — democracy.”
Commitment to democracy itself “appears to be waning by
generation,” the Charles F. Kettering Foundation reported.
Its survey showed that “80% of adults aged 65 and older say democracy is the
best form of government, compared with just 53% of those aged 18 to 29.”
It’s partly a result of young people raised on memetic
warfare pouring into their phones. The recent Global
Terrorism Index, from the Institute for Economics & Peace, reported on
jihadist groups radicalizing adolescents toward glorification of mass violence.
The effort is “designed to delegitimize democratic statehood” and erode social
cohesion, the report said.
Many Americans want to work together to solve all this.
To do so, we need to start with facts. I often liken our situation to a team of
doctors trying to help a sick patient. If they’re looking at different data, or
X-rays of different patients entirely, they can’t cooperate and build
solutions.
We need trustworthy sources of truth. But we don’t have
them. Instead of helping people understand reality by sharing only fact-checked
information, big news agencies are serving up a steady diet of rage
bait. A study found
that headlines are increasingly negative and focused on click-through rates
“regardless of journalistic quality.” Another found that people who spend more
time-consuming news are frequently more misinformed about
their political opponents.
Fixing this requires a long-term effort. News agencies
need to end the era of acting as stenographers for what people said. They
should limit themselves to telling us what’s definitively true and how they
know it. That could mean giving up short-term clicks, but in the long term it
could mean winning back the many who have flocked
away from following the news closely.
On Memorial Day, news agencies claim to venerate soldiers
who risked, and in many cases sacrificed, their lives to protect our democracy.
But these same agencies aren’t even willing to sacrifice short-term click rates
to protect our democracy.
The mission is clear: Focus on truth. Demand that people
on both sides of the aisle address it. Demand that they provide concrete
solutions to our problems, instead of giving them “open mics” to attack each
other constantly.
At this point, that’s a pie-in-the-sky hope for the legacy media. But those of us in new, independent media can take up the mantle. The mission doesn’t compare to the sacrifices of the fallen, but it’s crucial, nonetheless.
Josh Levs is host of They Stand Corrected, the podcast and newsletter fact-checking
the media. Find him at joshlevs.com.
-The Contrarian

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.