The Justice Department has granted Donald Trump, his
family and businesses immunity from ongoing inquiries into their taxes, a
potentially lucrative arrangement that could shield the president from
significant financial liability. The provision, quietly inserted on Tuesday as
a supplement to a remarkable deal that also created a $1.8 billion fund aimed
at benefiting Mr. Trump’s allies, protects the president, his relatives and his
businesses from pending audits and tax prosecutions.
The
one-page document, signed by the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche,
said that the government would be “FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED from
prosecuting or pursuing” pending tax claims against Mr. Trump, his family
members and businesses.
The provision invited immediate criticism as tax experts
raised the possibility that it was illegal. That the addendum to the deal was
posted, without fanfare, on the department’s website belied its bare-knuckled
audacity. It revealed the determination of Mr. Trump and his appointees to ram
through maximalist measures with minimum outside scrutiny at a moment when they
still have uncontested control of government.
The provision was the latest in a series of maneuvers
this week that blurred the all-but-vanished boundary between official
department business and the private interests of a president intent on using
his power to extract financial gain from the federal government for himself and
his allies.
A day earlier, Mr. Trump agreed to drop his $10 billion
lawsuit against the I.R.S. in
exchange for the establishment of a fund for people he believes were
wronged by federal investigations or prosecutions. Justice Department officials
had in part defended the creation of the fund by pointing to the fact that Mr.
Trump and his family members would not be paid by it.
But protection from audit could be quite financially
beneficial for Mr. Trump, who has always said that there was no wrongdoing in
his tax filings. In 2024, The New York Times reported that
a loss in an I.R.S. audit could cost Mr. Trump more than $100 million.
It is unclear if that examination has concluded or if Mr.
Trump, his family members or affiliated entities are under other audits. I.R.S.
procedures call for the mandatory audit of the president’s tax returns
annually. Neither the Justice Department nor the I.R.S. responded to requests
seeking comment. The top lawyer at the Treasury, Brian Morrissey, resigned
on Monday after the Justice Department announced the deal with Mr.
Trump.
Federal law prohibits the president, vice president and other executive officers from instructing the I.R.S. to start or stop specific audits. But that broad prohibition appears to include a carve out for the attorney general. Brandon DeBot, a senior attorney adviser at New York University’s Tax Law Center, said in a statement that the audit protection may still be illegal.
“The I.R.S. would need to act to make the release of
claims effective, which could raise additional questions about whether there
has been unlawful political interference in the audit process,” he said. “The
settlement and general release of claims is a breathtaking abuse of the tax and
legal system.”
The disclosure of the provision came as blowback appeared
to be mounting over the creation of the fund, including from a few Republican
lawmakers typically
wary of incurring Mr. Trump’s wrath. Senator John Thune, Republican of
South Dakota and the majority leader, offered rare criticism of the president,
saying he “was not a big fan” of the fund and adding that he did not see a
“purpose” to it.
The Times reported last
week that Mr. Trump’s talks with the Justice Department and the I.R.S. had
included a measure calling on the I.R.S. to drop any audits of the president,
his relatives or businesses. But that provision did not appear in the nine-page
agreement laying out the terms to dismiss the lawsuit, which the department
released on Monday.
In January, Mr. Trump, along with two of his sons and the
Trump family business, sued the Internal Revenue Service for at least $10
billion over the leak of their tax returns during the president’s first term.
The Trumps argued that the I.R.S. should have done more to prevent a former
contractor from disclosing tax information to The New York Times and
ProPublica.
Even as the original nine-page agreement offered scant
details of how disbursement would work or who would be eligible, it said that
claimants could seek money from the government for having faced reprisals for
“personal, political and/or ideological reasons.” It stated that a five-person
commission would consider claims based on criteria like damages a person had
incurred or any time they spent in federal custody.
The main agreement also indicated that claims would
largely be handed out in secrecy, requiring the fund managers to provide the
attorney general on a quarterly basis with a “confidential written report” of
those who received any money. The fund would stop processing claims no later
than Dec. 1, 2028, just weeks before Mr. Trump is scheduled to leave office.
Frank Bisignano, the chief executive of the I.R.S.,
signed the original, nine-page deal. The provisions granting Mr. Trump immunity
from existing audits, though, was signed only by Mr. Blanche, who has stepped
up carrying out Mr. Trump’s campaign of retribution against his enemies.
During an appearance before
a Senate appropriations subcommittee on Tuesday, Mr. Blanche defended the
fund. At one point, Senator Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of Maryland, repeatedly
accused Mr. Blanche of behaving more like a Trump defense lawyer than an
independent guardian of the public interest.
Mr. Blanche pushed back, asserting that he was “the
acting attorney general.”
Mr. Van Hollen replied, “Mr. Attorney General, you are
acting today like the president’s personal attorney, and that’s the whole
problem.”
Alan
Feuer covers extremism and political violence for The Times,
focusing on the criminal cases involving the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and
against former President Donald J. Trump.
Andrew
Duehren covers tax policy for The Times from Washington.
Glenn
Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also
written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails
and prisons.
A version of this article appears in print on May
20, 2026, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with
the headline: I.R.S. Ordered to Drop Audits Against Trump As Part of
Payout Deal. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.