During last Thursday
night’s State of the Union address, President Joe Biden issued an unmistakable
warning about the threat Donald Trump poses to American democracy.
The speech also implicitly made a more subtle point about democracy: that
defending it can require uncomfortably blunt talk.
One of democracy’s
core premises is that elections are not like armed conflict, where either you
win or you die. Since all parties accept the basic rules of the game, like
competitive elections and free speech, the stakes of elections are not
existential. Political opponents are less enemies than rivals; disagreement
isn’t disaster.
Authoritarian
populists like Donald Trump win by attacking this foundational democratic norm.
They demonize their
opponents, arguing repeatedly that their opponents are not rivals but rather
monsters bent on the country’s destruction. They claim that the system is in
the enemy’s corrupt hands and not to be trusted, that their faction and our
leader deserve absolute power (“I alone can fix it,” as Trump said in 2016). The
nefarious plans of the domestic enemy must be resisted by any means necessary,
even ones that might seem extreme.
“We fight like
hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country
anymore,” Trump said, infamously, in his speech on the morning of the January 6 attack.
For those committed
to democracy, this kind of radical attack might seem to pose a dilemma. If you
ignore or downplay your opponents’ rhetoric, you fail to alert the public to
the danger. But if you correctly point out that it threatens democracy, you risk
coming across as a hypocrite: demonizing your opponents in the same way they’re
demonizing you.
But this supposed
dilemma is no dilemma at all. The
reason is deceptively simple: There is no hypocrisy in defending truth against
lies.
When Trump says
the 2020 election was stolen, he is lying to
create a pretext to overthrow a legitimate election. When Biden calls Trump’s
behavior a threat to democracy, warning that the former president seeks “to
bury the truth of January 6,” he is telling the truth about Trump’s lies and
the dangers they pose to American democracy.
Fail to appreciate
this distinction and you risk falling into what I call the “norms trap:”
prioritizing the appearance of respecting democracy’s principles over acting in
those principles’ defense.
At the State of the
Union, Biden recognized this trap and avoided it.
When he warned of
the ongoing threat to American democracy, saying, “My predecessor and some of
you here seek to bury the truth of January 6th,” he did indeed sound an
unusually partisan note for the typically staid affair. This might seem like a
violation of democratic norms, and some conservatives attempted to cast it as such. This was the theme
of one of Fox News’ top stories after the speech.
This is hard to
take seriously as a good faith objection, especially given Trump’s State of the Union track record. As a
rhetorical tactic, though, it’s a powerful distraction: an attempt to shift
focus away from the substance of Biden’s warning about the rising threat to
democracy, onto a disingenuous debate over whether Biden himself is behaving
undemocratically.
Yes, it’s rare for
a president to in essence campaign during the State of the Union. But it’s also
unusual for the president’s opponent to be someone who has a stated desire to
be a “dictator on day one,” with a host of policies that could bring
that vision frighteningly close to fruition. The State of the Union is supposed
to highlight grave national concerns; this is clearly one of them.
This is not to say
that Biden can do or say whatever he wants to fight Trump. He should not break
the law or take actions that meaningfully weaken American democracy (which
Democrats are entirely capable of doing).
But in a world
where American democracy is facing an unprecedented threat from one of two
major political parties, it’s reasonable to risk a too-partisan speech in order
to safeguard it. It’s good that Biden recognized this and devoted a good chunk
of the State of the Union to telling the truth.
Zack Beauchamp
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers challenges to democracy in
the United States and abroad, right-wing populism, and the world of ideas. He
has received funding awards from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting to
report on democratic decline in Israel and Hungary in the field, and was the
longtime host of Worldly, Vox’s weekly podcast on foreign policy and
international affairs. He has appeared on a wide range of television and radio
networks, including MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, BBC, CBC, ABC (Australia), and Al
Jazeera.
Before coming
to Vox, he edited TP Ideas, a section of ThinkProgress devoted to the ideas
shaping our political world. He has a master’s degree in international
relations from the London School of Economics and grew up in Washington, DC,
where he currently lives with his wife, two children, and (rescue) dogs.
MAILTO:ZACK@VOX.COM TWITTER RSS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.