The most annoying thing, from a legal perspective, about Donald Trump is how he plays the delay game, drawing cases out far longer than any other litigant could get away with. He relentlessly files borderline (and sometimes outright) frivolous motions and fights every step of the way, using every motion to reconsider and every other procedural tool available, even when it’s hopeless.
That’s how it felt today in the E. Jean Carroll
case. We’ll get to what happened during the day in a minute, but first let’s
start with how it ended, just after 10 p.m. ET. The Second Circuit Court of
Appeals denied Trump’s request to stay District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s order that
it was time for Trump to pay Carroll the $5 million, plus post-judgment
interest, that he owes her. The Second Circuit ruled just hours after Trump
asked for the stay.
Trump, of course, isn’t done yet. Next, he’ll ask the
Supreme Court for a stay. Prediction: It will be similarly unavailing. Stick a
fork in this case. It’s done.
You’ll recall it’s not actually Trump who has to pay up
here. That’s because, as a condition of being able to appeal the judgment in
Carroll’s favor in the first place, he had to deposit $5.5 million into the
Court Registry Investment System (“CRIS”). He did that on June 28, 2023,
shortly after Carroll won the case at trial. So Judge Kaplan’s order is
actually directed to the Clerk of Court, who oversees the CRIS. The Judge
wrote: “The Clerk is respectfully directed to disburse” $5 million in judgment
plus interest to Carroll’s lawyers on her behalf.
Unlike other times when courts have granted Trump a stay
pending appeal at the same time they issued an order, Judge Kaplan did not do
that here. That forced Trump’s lawyers to file their notice of appeal and immediately ask the Second
Circuit for a stay before the Clerk could disburse the funds. “The need for an
administrative stay here is acute,” they wrote. “The district court’s order directs the Clerk
to disburse the funds, and once entered that order may be executed at any
time.”
Trump argued that once the funds are "distributed to
third parties, they likely will not be recoverable—rendering any stay this
Court might later grant, and any relief President Trump might later obtain on
appeal, ineffective.” But that argument didn’t stick the landing for him.
Underneath it all is Trump’s effort to conflate Carroll’s
two victories: this one, based on his defamation of Carroll after he left
office, and the other case, involving statements he made while he was
president. He has a tenuous argument that some form of immunity may apply in
that case—an argument the Second Circuit rejected. But that case is not this case,
and there is no reason to delay this one because of the other.
Now it’s up to the Supreme Court, which has already
denied certiorari in this case, to enforce its own ruling. It has before it
Trump’s motion to reconsider its refusal to hear the case, which it can deny at
any moment, along with his motion for a stay of Judge Kaplan’s disbursement
order. Unless Trump simply gives up and gives in to the inevitable by letting
the money he deposited into the court’s fund go to Carroll, his lawyers will
need to get an appeal and a stay application to the Supreme Court immediately.
If the Court does not order a stay, the Clerk is free to disburse the funds at
any time because a judge has ordered that they be disbursed, and no stay is in
place.
In his deposition, Trump, who had said Carroll was “not
my type,” identified her as his second wife, Marla Maples.
After her win in the $83.3 million defamation case, which
is still on appeal, Carroll responded to a question about how she intended to
spend the money like this: “I’d like to give the money to something Donald Trump hates. If it’ll cause him pain for me to
give money to certain things, that’s my intent.”
How splendid. Sometimes justice happens. We’re close.
If you want to revisit some of our earlier columns on the
two Carroll defamation cases, here are a few to start with:
May 22, 2023, Standing Up To The Bully, Again
January 26, 2024, $83.3 Million
September 8, 2025, Affirmed: E Jean Carroll Case
May 29, 2026, E. Jean Carroll: Is DOJ investigating her, or
not?
Trump has spent years using a delay game to win. Tonight,
in E. Jean Carroll’s case, the courts moved fast, signaling that at least in
this case, time’s up. Thanks for being here with me at Civil Discourse for
all of it! Your paid subscriptions make this newsletter possible.
We’re in this together,
-Joyce Vance

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.