A year ago tonight [July
17], Georgia Representative John Lewis passed away from pancreatic
cancer at 80 years old. As a young adult, Lewis was a “troublemaker,” breaking
the laws of his state: the laws upholding racial segregation. He organized
voting registration drives and in 1960 was one of the thirteen original Freedom
Riders, white and Black students traveling together from Washington, D.C., to
New Orleans to challenge segregation. “It was very violent. I thought I was
going to die. I was left lying at the Greyhound bus station in Montgomery
unconscious,” Lewis later recalled.
An adherent of the philosophy of nonviolence, Lewis was
beaten by mobs and arrested 24 times. As chairman of the Student Nonviolent
Coordinating Committee (SNCC—pronounced “snick”), he helped to organize the
1963 March on Washington where the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., told more
than 200,000 people gathered at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial that he had a
dream. Just 23 years old, Lewis spoke at the march. Two years later, as Lewis
and 600 marchers hoping to register African American voters in Alabama stopped
to pray at the end of the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, mounted police
troopers charged the marchers, beating them with clubs and bullwhips. They
fractured Lewis’s skull.
To observers in 1965 reading the newspapers, Lewis was simply
one of the lawbreaking protesters who were disrupting the “peace” of the South.
But what seemed to be fruitless and dangerous protests were, in fact, changing
minds. Shortly after the attack in Selma, President Lyndon Baines Johnson
honored those changing ideas when he went on TV to support the marchers and
call for Congress to pass a national voting rights bill. On August 6, 1965, Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act
authorizing federal supervision of voter registration in districts where
African Americans were historically underrepresented.
When Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, just 6.7 percent
of Black voters in Mississippi were registered to vote. Two years later, almost
60% of them were. In 1986, those new Black voters helped to elect Lewis to
Congress. He held the seat until he died, winning reelection 16 times.
Now, just a year after Representative Lewis’s death, the
voting rights for which he fought are under greater threat than they have been
since 1965. After the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision of the Supreme
Court gutted the Voting Rights Act by taking away Department of Justice
supervision of election changes in states with a history of racial
discrimination, Republican-dominated state legislatures began to enact measures
that would cut down on minority voting.
At Representative Lewis’s funeral, former President Barack
Obama called for renewing the Voting Rights Act. "You want to honor John?”
he said. “Let's honor him by revitalizing the law that he was willing to die
for.” Instead, after the 2020 election, Republican-dominated legislatures
ramped up their effort to skew the vote in their favor by limiting access to
the ballot. As of mid-June 2021,
17 states had passed 28 laws making it harder to vote, while more bills
continue to move forward.
Then, on July 1,
by a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court handed down Brnovich v. Democratic National
Committee, saying that the state of Arizona did not violate the 1965 Voting
Rights Act when it passed laws that limited ballot delivery to voters, family
members, or caregivers, or when it required election officials to throw out
ballots that voters had cast in the wrong precincts by accident.
The fact that voting restrictions affect racial or ethnic
groups differently does not make them illegal, Justice Samuel Alito wrote. “The
mere fact that there is some disparity in impact does not necessarily mean that
a system is not equally open or that it does not give everyone an equal
opportunity to vote.”
Justice Elena Kagan wrote a blistering dissent, in which
Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined. “If a single statute
represents the best of America, it is the Voting Rights Act,” Kagan wrote, “It
marries two great ideals: democracy and racial equality. And it dedicates our
country to carrying them out.” She explained, “The Voting Rights Act is
ambitious, in both goal and scope. When President Lyndon Johnson sent the bill
to Congress, ten days after John Lewis led marchers across the Edmund Pettus
Bridge, he explained that it was “carefully drafted to meet its objective—the
end of discrimination in voting in America.” It gave every citizen “the right
to an equal opportunity to vote.”
“Much of the Voting Rights Act’s success lay in its capacity
to meet ever-new forms of discrimination,” Kagan wrote. Those interested in
suppressing the vote have always offered “a non-racial rationalization” even
for laws that were purposefully discriminatory. Poll taxes, elaborate
registration regulations, and early poll closings were all designed to limit
who could vote but were defended as ways to prevent fraud and corruption, even
when there was no evidence that fraud or corruption was a problem. Kagan noted
that the Arizona law permitting the state to throw out ballots cast in the wrong
precinct invalidated twice as many ballots cast by Indigenous Americans, Black
Americans, and Hispanic Americans as by whites.
“The majority’s opinion mostly inhabits a law-free zone,” she
wrote.
Congress has been slow to protect voting rights. Although it
renewed the Voting Rights Act by an overwhelming majority in 2006, that impulse
has disappeared. In March 2021,
the House of Representatives passed the For the People Act on which
Representative Lewis had worked, a sweeping measure that protects the right to
vote, removes dark money from politics, and ends partisan gerrymandering.
Republicans in the Senate killed the bill, and Democrats were unwilling to
break the filibuster to pass it alone.
An attempt simply to restore the provision of the Voting Rights
Act gutted in 2013 has not yet been introduced, although it has been named: the
John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Only one Republican, Alaska senator
Lisa Murkowski, has signed on to the bill.
Yesterday,
the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Representative Joyce Beatty
(D-OH), was arrested with eight other protesters in the Hart Senate Office
Building for demanding legislation to protect voting rights.
After her arrest, Beatty tweeted: “You can arrest me. You
can’t stop me. You can’t silence me.”
Last June, Representative Lewis told Washington Post
columnist Jonathan Capehart that he was “inspired” by last summer’s peaceful
protests in America and around the world against police violence. “It was so
moving and so gratifying to see people from all over America and all over the
world saying through their action, ‘I can do something. I can say something,’”
Lewis told Capehart. “And they said something by marching and by speaking up
and speaking out.”
Capehart asked Lewis “what he would say to people who feel as
though they have already been giving it their all but nothing seems to change.”
Lewis answered: “You must be able and prepared to give until you cannot give
any more. We must use our time and our space on this little planet that we call
Earth to make a lasting contribution, to leave it a little better than we found
it, and now that need is greater than ever before.”
“Do not get lost in a sea of despair,” Lewis tweeted almost
exactly a year before his death. “Do not become bitter or hostile. Be hopeful,
be optimistic. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good
trouble, necessary trouble. We will find a way to make a way out of no way.”
—-
Notes:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-1257_g204.pdf
From Richard Palzer:
ReplyDeleteAs usual these days, this issue of voter rights is being exaggerated and exploited by both Parties. For the Democrats' part, requiring voter I.D measures is anathema (this, despite a majority of African Americans favoring them, according to The Dispatch.com) and accusations, even by President Biden, of restrictions amounting to modern-day Jim Crow, obvious political hyperbole. Even pulling back some coronavirus relaxations (i.e., drive-thru and mail-in) voting access is easier than before the pandemic. Don't have an I.D.? Get one-free, available by request. Don't care? Won't expend the effort? So, voting's a right but with no duty?
As for the Republicans, how is what Judge Alito wrote not a contradiction? Is there another way of reading "voting restrictions affect racial or ethnic groups differently" and "some disparity in impact" that somehow deems the system as giving equal opportunity? But not illegal? Suppression, but okay?
Of course, their claim of just pursuing "election integrity" to prevent widespread fraud is itself a fraud, spawned by Trump's continued lies of a rigged election.
But reason, bipartisanship, and compromise--who needs 'em?