“Anticipating
an avalanche of absentee ballots, the U.S. Postal Service recently sent
detailed letters to 46 states and D.C. warning that it cannot guarantee all
ballots cast by mail for the November election will arrive in time to be
counted — adding another layer of uncertainty ahead of the high-stakes
presidential contest.
“The
letters sketch a grim possibility for the tens of millions of Americans
eligible for a mail-in ballot this fall: Even if people follow all of their
state’s election rules, the pace of Postal Service delivery may disqualify
their votes.
“The
Postal Service’s warnings of potential disenfranchisement came as the agency
undergoes a sweeping organizational and policy overhaul amid dire financial
conditions. Cost-cutting moves have already delayed mail delivery by as much as
a week in some places, and a new decision to decommission 10 percent of the
Postal Service’s sorting machines sparked widespread concern the slowdowns will
only worsen. Rank-and-file postal workers say the move is ill-timed and could
sharply diminish the speedy processing of flat mail, including letters and
ballots.
“The
ballot warnings, issued at the end of July from Thomas J. Marshall, general
counsel and executive vice president of the Postal Service, and obtained through
a records request by The Washington Post, were planned before the appointment
of Louis DeJoy, a former logistics executive and ally of President Trump, as
postmaster general in early summer. They go beyond the traditional coordination
between the Postal Service and election officials, drafted as fears surrounding
the coronavirus pandemic
triggered an unprecedented and sudden shift to mail-in voting.
“Some
states anticipate 10 times the normal volume of election mail. Six states and
D.C. received warnings that ballots could be delayed for a narrow set of
voters. But the Postal Service gave 40 others — including the key battleground
states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Florida — more-serious warnings that their
long-standing deadlines for requesting, returning or counting ballots were ‘incongruous’
with mail service and that voters who send ballots in close to those deadlines
may become disenfranchised…
“In
response to the Postal Service’s warnings, a few states have quickly moved
deadlines — forcing voters to request or cast ballots earlier, or deciding to
delay tabulating results while waiting for more ballots to arrive.
“Pennsylvania
election officials cited its letter late Thursday in
asking the state’s Supreme Court for permission to count ballots delivered
three days after Election Day. But deadlines in many other states have not been
or cannot be adjusted with
just weeks remaining before the first absentee ballots hit the mail stream.
More than 60 lawsuits in at least two dozen states over the mechanics of
mail-in voting are wending their way through the courts.
“Trump
has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that mail ballots lead to widespread
voter fraud and in the process politicized the USPS. This week, he said he opposes emergency
funding for the agency — which has repeatedly requested more resources —
because of Democratic efforts to expand mail voting.
“The
Postal Service’s structural upheaval alone has led experts and lawmakers from
both parties to worry about timely delivery of prescription medications and
Social Security checks, as well as ballots. ‘The slowdown is another tool in
the toolbox of voter suppression,’ said Celina Stewart, senior director of
advocacy and litigation with the nonpartisan League of Women Voters. ‘That’s no
secret. We do think this is a voter-suppression tactic.’
“Vanita
Gupta, a Justice Department official in the Obama administration and now
president and chief executive of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights,
said she viewed the situation as ‘the weaponization of the U.S. Postal Service
for the president’s electoral purposes. It’s completely outrageous that the
U.S. Postal Service is in this position,’ Gupta said.
“DeJoy,
in service changes last month, has drastically reduced overtime and banned
extra trips to ensure on-time mail delivery. His wholesale reorganizations
ousted several agency veterans in key operational roles. And the USPS is
currently decommissioning 10 percent of its costly and bulky mail-sorting
machines, which workers say could hinder processing of election mail, according
to a grievance filed by the American Postal Workers Union and obtained by The
Washington Post. Those 671 machines, scattered across the country but
concentrated in high-population areas, have the capacity to sort 21.4 million
pieces of paper mail per hour.
“The
machine reductions, together with existing mail delays and a surge of packages
— a boon to the Postal Service’s finances but a headache for an organization
designed to handle paper rather than boxes — also risk hamstringing the agency
as the election approaches and have lead lawmakers to hike up pressure on DeJoy
to rescind his directives.
“DeJoy
wrote in a letter to USPS workers Thursday that
temporary delivery slowdowns were ‘unintended consequences’ of his efficiency
moves but that the ‘discipline’ he was bringing to the agency ‘will increase
our performance for the election and upcoming peak season and maintain the high
level of public trust we have earned for dedication and commitment to our
customers throughout our history.’
“DeJoy
declined to be interviewed, but in a statement the USPS described the machine
reductions as a matter of ‘routinely’ moving equipment to accommodate the mix
of packages and letters in the mail stream. Doing so ‘will ensure more
efficient, cost effective operations and better service for our customers,’ the
statement said.
“Even
without the emergency funding Trump vowed to block, postal workers can handle
the country’s mail-in ballots with proper planning, the head of their union
said. ‘Piece of cake for postal workers,’ said Mark Dimondstein, president of
the American Postal Workers Union. Johnson, the USPS spokeswoman, also said the
agency ‘is well prepared and has ample capacity to deliver America’s election
mail.’…
“The
letters warning about November caution many states that their deadlines for
voters to request an absentee ballot are too close to Election Day and that ‘the
Postal Service cannot adjust its delivery standards to accommodate the
requirements of state election law.’ The letters put the onus on election
officials to adjust deadlines or educate voters to act well before them.
“Mail
carriers, meanwhile, have warned that new cost-cutting measures at the USPS are
slowing the delivery of mail ballots in key states. Recent contests have
offered a preview of the potential consequences, with voters — particularly in
urban areas such as Detroit and the Bronx — complaining that their absentee
ballots did not arrive until the last minute or at all.
“The
problems predate the cost-cutting measures — a late returned ballot was the
chief reason absentee or mail ballots were disqualified during the 2016
election, according to U.S. Election Assistance Commission data submitted to
Congress.
“An analysis of
the USPS letters to states reveals that the threat of ballot rejection because
of missed delivery deadlines may be highest for voters in 40 states that
received serious warnings. About 159.5 million registered voters live in
those states.
“According
to the letters, the risk of disenfranchisement is greatest for voters who wait
until close to Election Day to request or cast a ballot. The letters advised 31
states that regardless of their deadlines, voters should mail ballots no later
than Oct. 27 — a week before Election Day — if they want to guarantee they
are counted.
“Elections
officials across the country are also installing drop boxes for completed
ballots and encouraging voters to use them in lieu of the Postal Service. The
USPS did not offer serious warnings to the five states that have long conducted
universal vote-by-mail elections — Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and
Washington…
“Postal
workers, meanwhile, are concerned over the ongoing removal of mail sorting
machines in areas that project to be hotly contested in the presidential race. The
machines — Automated Facer-Canceler Systems, Delivery Bar Code Sorters,
Automated Flat Sorting Machines and Flat Sequencing Systems — can label and
sort tens of thousands of paper mail items, such as letters, bills and ballots,
each hour.
“Purchased
when letters and not packages made up a greater share of postal work, the bulky
and aging machines can be expensive to maintain and take up floor space postal
leaders say would be better devoted to boxes. Removing underused machines would
make the overall system more efficient, postal leaders say. The USPS has cut
back on mail-sorting equipment for years since mail volume began to decline in
the 2000s. The machines, however, fundamentally changed the job of some postal
workers, allowing them to spend more time on the street delivering mail, rather
than in post offices organizing it.
“Elections
officials in several states contacted by The Washington Post said their
deadlines for voting by mail had been in place for years and that the Postal
Service has long noted some concerns about meeting them. Some officials
received the warnings with skepticism, others with resignation…” (The Washington Post).
Jada
Yuan contributed to this report: "Postal Service warns 46 states their voters could be disenfranchised by delayed mail-in ballots"
Erin
Cox is a politics reporter covering Maryland. She joined The Washington Post in
2018 and has written about Maryland since 2007.
Elise
Viebeck is a political enterprise and investigations reporter. She joined The
Washington Post in 2015.
Jacob
Bogage writes about business and technology for The Post, where he has worked
since 2015. He previously covered the automotive and manufacturing industries
and wrote for the Sports section.
Christopher
Ingraham writes about all things data. He previously worked at the Brookings
Institution and the Pew Research Center.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.