“Governing
is a lot more difficult than campaigning.
“On
the campaign trail, a candidate frequently benefits from using vague
rhetoric that sounds good but provides little in the way of detail. Just ask
Gov. Bruce Rauner. As a candidate, he pledged to get Illinois' fiscal
house in order, primarily by rejiggering its budget to focus state spending on ‘essential’ services,
while cutting ‘nonessential’ programs.
“Candidate
Rauner insisted this was needed because Illinois has a spending problem,
not a revenue problem, which sounded pretty logical. Unfortunately, after
getting elected, a candidate's broadly appealing yet superficial campaign
rhetoric usually gets exposed for the sophistry it is.
“Reality
is tough that way. In the case of Rauner's campaign rhetoric, the inevitable
exposé is coming from an unexpected source: the governor himself and key
members of his administration.
“Start
with the contention that Illinois has a spending problem, not a revenue
problem. If that were truly the case, it indeed would be possible to
redress a significant portion of Illinois' fiscal woes by cutting ‘nonessential’
spending. So when confronted with a $1.6 billion shortfall in the current
fiscal year, you'd expect the governor's team would identify all those ‘nonessential’
services and propose giving them the ax. And you'd be wrong.
“As
the Rauner administration quickly discovered, it's difficult to categorize
things like child care for working parents, staffing levels at prisons and
court reporters as ‘nonessential.’ This in turn led to a deal with the
Democratic-controlled General Assembly to avert some $1.3 billion in potential
cuts by raising that amount in revenue through a sweep of various special
funds. Mind you, this left $300 million to cut, an amount Rauner
apparently believed was too severe. Shortly after announcing the deal,
he emphasized that ‘our administration had actually advocated more
sweeping and fewer cuts.’
“This
is interesting because it shows, in both words and action, that Rauner recognizes
that two core aspects of his campaign rhetoric don't pass the reality
test. First and foremost, it demonstrates that spending on nonessential fluff
isn't the problem. Indeed, the services being cut are crucial for many Illinois
families. And if he didn't get that before Good Friday, he certainly did
after.
“In
what's been dubbed the ‘Good Friday Massacre,’ Rauner's administration proposed
trimming an additional $26 million from the current budget, in part by
cutting services for individuals with autism and burial funds for the
indigent. One can describe in many ways the programs that allow poor
families to bury deceased loved ones with dignity or that help autistic
individuals attain a basic quality of life, but ‘nonessential’ isn't among
them. Predictably, the public
outcry forced reconsideration of the cuts.
“Second,
there's the implicit recognition by Rauner that more revenue is needed to
support core services. Apparently, this need is so glaring that it justifies
using one-time revenue obtained through fund sweeps to plug the current
spending gap — which works, of course, only for the current year. Next year,
there will be no revenue available to support the $1.3 billion in spending
that was so ‘essential’ this year that special funds had to be raided to cover
them.
“Why settle for this implicit
acknowledgement of Illinois' unambiguous need for more revenue, when
explicit recognition is readily available? Objecting to some proposed cuts
that would hit poor children particularly hard, Sen. Mattie Hunter,
D-Chicago, asked Rauner appointee Gregory Bassi, acting director of human
services, whether money was ‘more important than the children of Illinois.’
In his response, Bassi acknowledged that children ‘are obviously more
important, but you can't support the children of the state if you don’t have
the resources to do it.’
“He's exactly right. The problem isn't
wasteful or nonessential spending. It's a lack of revenue. And it's the
governor's job to deal with real problems, no matter how inconsistent with
campaign rhetoric.”
Ralph Martire is executive director of
the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, a bipartisan fiscal policy think
tank.
This article
was published in the State-Journal Register, April 22nd.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.