Because this story is going to be misunderstood by 95
percent of people that read it, let’s get the basics out of the way: the
Detroit Tigers reached a pre-agreement with 12-year-old Kevin Sosa for
a reported $4 million. As crazy as that sounds, Sosa is not the youngest player
ever to reach a pre-agreement with an MLB team; sources
told ESPN in April that verbal understandings included players as
young as 11.
This is not a contract but an “informal”
verbal agreement on a future contract that Sosa will sign in four years when he
is 16 — these agreements are common, though the $4 million figure is
unprecedented for a player of Sosa’s age. These days, they are the backbone of
the international signing system, and teams are increasingly willing to make
larger bets on younger players to gain an edge.
Now, I know what you’re thinking: “oh my gosh, that
should not be allowed! A twelve-year-old should be in school, should be playing
outside, hanging out with their friends, not worrying about their professional
career!” That’s also what I’m thinking, but that is not how the ugly underbelly
of Major League Baseball operates. And it’s certainly worth asking if the
system needs a complete overhaul during MLB's looming labor showdown. I sure
think it does.
(I am not a scout nor an expert on the international
signing ecosystem; if you want an excellent overview of how it all works, I
recommend Future Value, a 2020 book by
Kiley McDaniel and Eric Longenhagen which goes in-depth on scouting and talent
identification in MLB; it’s where much of my own understanding comes from.)
The international system is nothing like American
amateurs; there is no draft, and much of the talent identification happens with
trainers in the Dominican Republic. The vast majority of international
prospects come from the DR and Venezuela, and most scouting happens physically
in the DR. MLB has rules about when you can sign players and for how much, but
they do nothing to change the fundamental nature of what international
scouting: gambling on the development of teenagers.
Agreeing to sign Kevin Sosa for $4 million is a massive risk for the Tigers, and one that could hurt the rest of one of their international classes when such a huge chunk of their limited bonus pool will go to him. But the fact that such a thing is even allowed is worth investigating. Should MLB teams really be pledging millions to pre-teens? Well, uh, no, they shouldn’t.
In early August, I asked FanGraphs’ Brendan Gawlowski how he felt about international scouting these days, and he mentioned how objective measurements have changed the landscape in the last five years. But the second half of his response hit a bit harder: “That said, it’s still a lot of dice rolls on 12–14-year-olds in a way that feels pretty uncomfortable.”
I couldn’t agree more; there are political and cultural
realities that shouldn’t be papered over, but the simple fact that a huge chunk
of MLB’s talent pool are kids with big dreams who are often paid less than they
should be is hard to defend. An international draft would be a step in the
right direction, though it would require a substantial reformatting of how
teams set up their international operations.
But international scouting is, at this point, an
abomination that I cannot possibly do justice in detailing here and one that
supports financial impropriety though a class of unsavory skimmers and bad
actors. It’s also one that MLB allows to exist by not doing more to rationalize
the process, perhaps through a draft or perhaps through a more centralized,
league-run academy system.
That idea is one I
read from Michael Baumann back in June (FanGraphs members-only link),
and he had another good (albeit impossible) idea: the total abolition of the
draft in favor of total international free agency at age 18. Drafts are, if you
think about them hard enough, morally intolerable and an abomination of labor
rights. We could just do away with it all.
In any case, Kevin Sosa’s agreement will bring calls for
the curtailing of a system that has mutated well out of control. It has been
mutated for a while, and many of us would appreciate real changes in the next
CBA. Unfortunately, given the throwdown that’s about to happen, I wouldn’t be
shocked if it got backburnered.
-Oliver Fox, Fansided

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.