If the goal of the CNN interview with Vice President Kamala
Harris and Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota was to relitigate the campaign
controversies of the last month — to get the candidates to talk about the major
narratives of the election so far — then it was a rousing success.
Harris easily dispatched questions about her identity and
gave a strong defense of President Biden’s record. Walz, likewise, made short
work of the charge that he had misled the public when he spoke about using one
fertility treatment when it was actually another, similar treatment.
But if the goal was to learn something about a prospective
President Harris — to gain insight into how she might make decisions, order
priorities and approach the job of chief executive — then I think the interview
was not a success. Not so much for Harris or the viewing public.
It might be interesting to journalists to know how Harris
explains her changing views from 2019, when she ran for the Democratic
nomination, to now, when she is the nominee. But it is not at all clear to me
that it is interesting to viewers, who may be less concerned with how she deals
with the question and more concerned with the actual substance of what she
wants to do as president.
A soft-focus question about a photograph, however
iconic, seems less valuable than a question about Harris’s view of the
presidency now that she’s spent almost four years in the passenger’s seat as
vice president.
Speaking for myself, I am less interested in hearing
candidates navigate controversies or speak to narratives than I am in hearing
them talk, for lack of a better term, about their theory of the office. How
does a candidate for president conceptualize the presidency? What would she
prioritize in office and how would she handle an endless onslaught of crises
and issues that may, or may not, demand her attention? How does she imagine her
relationship with Congress and how would she try to achieve her goals in the
face of an opposition legislature? How does she imagine her relationship with
the public and what value does she place on communication and the bully pulpit?
Are there presidents she most admires — and why? Are there presidential
accomplishments that stand out and how so? What are the worst mistakes a
president can make? Why do you want this job in the first place?
I can think of other questions along these lines, but you get
the gist. To know what candidates for president think about the office and
their role in it is, I believe, a better guide to what they may do in the White
House than almost anything else. The only thing better is prior experience.
These kinds of questions may not make for the most scintillating television,
but I think they could provide the kind of insights that could actually help
Americans decide what they want out of a national leader.
-New York Times
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.