Last February, some 20 men and their wives gathered for
dinner at an upscale restaurant in Spokane, Washington, for their annual
Valentine’s Day celebration. The men weren’t just friends; they did community
service work together. They had been featured on local television, in khakis
and baseball caps, delivering 1,200 pounds of food to an area veterans’ center;
they were gearing up for their next food drive, which they called Operation
Hunger Smash. A few days after the holiday, the men went camping in the snow-speckled
mountains outside Spokane, where they grilled rib-eyes and bacon-wrapped
asparagus over a bonfire.
They also engaged in more menacing activities. They assembled
regularly — sometimes wearing night-vision goggles in the dark — to practice
storming buildings together with semiautomatic rifles. Their drills included
using sniper rifles to shoot targets from distances of half a mile. And they
belonged to a shadowy organization whose members were debating, with ever more
intensity, whether they should engage in mass-scale political violence.
They were among the thousands of members of American Patriots
Three Percent, a militia that has long been one of the largest in the United
States and has mostly managed to avoid scrutiny. Its ranks included cops and
convicted criminals, active-duty U.S. soldiers and small-business owners, truck
drivers and health care professionals. Like other militias, AP3 has a vague but
militant right-wing ideology, a pronounced sense of grievance and a commitment
to armed action. It has already sought to shape American life through vigilante
operations: AP3 members have “rounded up” immigrants at the Texas border,
assaulted Black Lives Matter protesters and attempted to crack down on people
casting absentee ballots.
Now with the presidential election less than 100 days away,
AP3 members see the fate of their country turning on a turbulent, charged
campaign. They’re certain that Democrats will try to steal — not for the first
time, in their view — the White House from Donald Trump. “The next election
won’t be decided at a Ballot Box,” an AP3 leader wrote several months ago in a
private Telegram chat. “It’ll be decided at the ammo box.” He has said he is
ready to force his way into voting centers if need be, or “whatever it takes.”
The public’s impression of American militias is dominated by
Jan. 6, 2021. Groups such as the Proud Boys had plotted to prevent the transfer
of power from Trump to Joe Biden. They formed the vanguard of the mob that
stormed the Capitol that day, according to the Department of Justice. Media
coverage since has centered on the prosecutions of participants, with hundreds
of rioters sent to prison.
But despite the riot and its fallout, militias are far from
extinct. AP3 has expanded at a dramatic pace since Jan. 6, while keeping much
of its activity out of view. This rise is documented in more than 100,000
internal messages obtained by ProPublica, spanning the run-up to Jan. 6 through
early 2024. Along with extensive interviews with 22 current and former members
of AP3, the records provide a uniquely detailed inside view of the militia
movement at a crucial moment.
The messages reveal how AP3 leaders have forged alliances
with law enforcement around the country and show the ways in which, despite an
initial crackdown by social media, they have attracted a new wave of recruits.
A change in the political climate has also helped: In a matter of months after
Jan. 6, rioters went from pariahs to heroes in the rhetoric of prominent
Republican politicians. By the summer of 2021, people were enlisting in AP3,
saying that Jan. 6 inspired them to join.
A portrait emerges of a group alternating between focused
action and self-destructive chaos and facing a schism over whether political
engagement can still address our nation’s problems — or whether violence is the
only option. It can be hard to discern the line between bluster and imminent
threat in the messages, a perennial struggle for FBI agents who monitor
paramilitary groups. But some senior AP3 members grew so alarmed that they
quit, scared by the number of people, even high-level leaders, advocating acts
of terror.
The materials also shed light on what former national
security officials say is the most urgent question regarding militias: Will
Jan. 6 prove the high-water mark of the movement’s violence or merely a prelude
to something more catastrophic? AP3 leaders have sometimes characterized the
storming of the Capitol as a botched job, a failure of ill-formed plans that
didn’t go far enough. “The Jan 6 event made the movement look weak and
uncommitted,” one wrote a year and a half after the riot in a secret channel.
“Had the house been taken for real and held we would all be in a different
world.”
This is the story of a militia fighting for its survival,
determined not to make the same mistake twice… Click here for the full story: Inside
the Turbulent, Secret World of the AP3 Militia — ProPublica
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.