A
vaccine by early 2021, a steady decline in cases by next fall and back to
normal in a few years—11 top experts look into the future.
Elizabeth
Ralph is deputy editor at Politico Magazine.
Part
1
“The
microscopic bundles of RNA, wrapped in spiky proteins, latch on to human cells,
hijack them, use them as factories to replicate, and then leave them for dead.
It’s a biological blitzkrieg—an invasion so swift and unexpected that the germs
are free to jump from host to host with little interference.
“Fast
forward to the future. Now, when the prickly enemies invade the lungs, they
slip past the human cells, unable to take hold. They’re marked for destruction,
soon to be surrounded and eliminated. Though some escape through the airways,
they confront the same defenses in their next target—if, that is, they can get
anywhere near the human cells. There are so few people left to infect that the
germs have nowhere to replicate, nowhere to survive.
“This
is the end of the coronavirus pandemic. And this is how it could happen in the
United States: By November
2021, most Americans have received two doses of a vaccine
that, while not gloriously effective, fights the disease in more cases than
not. Meanwhile, Americans continue to wear masks and avoid large gatherings,
and the Covid-19 numbers drop steadily after a series of surges earlier in the
year. Eventually, as more and more Americans develop immunity through exposure
and vaccination, and as treatments become more effective, Covid-19 recedes into
the swarm of ordinary illnesses Americans get every winter.
“‘It
will take two things to bring this virus under control: hygienic measures and a
vaccine. And you can’t have one without the other,’ says Paul Offit, director
of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of
Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
“The
future laid out above is the likeliest scenario for how the pandemic could end,
based on interviews with 11 top-level experts who think about the future of
those microscopic SARS-CoV-2 particles every day. They agree there’s a lot of
fog left in the Covid-19 crystal ball, but most accept several likelihoods: At
least one effective vaccine—hopefully several—will be approved in the U.S. by
early next year. Producing and distributing a vaccine will take months, with
the average American not receiving their dose (or doses) until at least mid- or
late 2021. And while widespread inoculation will play a large role in bringing
life back to normal, getting the shot will not be your cue to take off your
mask and run free into a crowded bar. The end of the pandemic will be an
evolution, not a revolution, the vaccine just another powerful tool in that
process.
“That
assessment dramatically contrasts with President Donald Trump’s Panglossian
certainty that the U.S. has ‘rounded the corner’ in the pandemic, that a
vaccine will be ready by Election Day and that every American can get the shot
by April. Most importantly, it contradicts the underlying assumption of Trump’s
many proclamations: that life will immediately return to normal after a vaccine
is administered. ‘I don’t see this pandemic ending as in like, you know, ‘This
is the day, the pandemic ended,’ says virologist Angela Rasmussen. ‘I see this
as being a process that will go for a long time, potentially even years.’
“Experts’
estimates of the timeline vary, but there seems to be some agreement that the
virus could be in decline and under control by the second half of 2021, and
that society could see pre-Covid ‘normal’ within two years. ‘I’ve said November 2021,’ predicts Zeke
Emanuel, former Obama adviser and chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and
Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. ‘I think you’ll have enough
herd immunity [in the U.S.] that we’ll have an unremitting decline.’ Herd
immunity is the point at which so many people are immune that the virus can no
longer spread widely.
“Florian
Krammer, professor of vaccinology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, put it this way: ‘What I think is going to happen at some point in
[20]21 is the virus is basically morphing from a real spread into something
that’s in the way and causes some low numbers of cases and probably very low
numbers of deaths.’
“The
precise timing, of course, is uncertain—an elusive future that rests on a
series of known unknowns, things like how many people continue to wear masks
and social distance and whether rapid Covid-19 tests become widely available
and properly deployed. Much will depend on how effective the vaccines are, how
many people refuse to get inoculated and how many people forget to get their
second dose if the vaccine requires two (yes, that is a significant concern).
And then there’s what epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, director of the Center
for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota,
calls ‘the trillion-dollar word of the day with this disease’: immunity. How
long, on average, will immunity from natural infection and from the vaccine
last?
“‘We
can get [to herd immunity] with vaccination and clinical disease,’ he says. ‘The
question is how long can we stay there. Meaning, if we get to, say, 75 or 80
percent immune projection, would it stay that way if we didn’t do anything
else?’ Perhaps that’s the most important thing to understand about the pandemic
right now: Though experts can make their best guesses, there is no certainty
about Covid-19’s future. ‘If this were an influenza pandemic, I would feel
confident telling you how it would end,’ says Osterholm. ‘But this coronavirus
keeps throwing us curve balls day after day.’
“This
kind of unpredictability is why Sarah Cobey, an epidemiologist at the
University of Chicago, chose her field in the first place: ‘One of the reasons
I wanted to study infectious disease dynamics is that they can be really
unintuitive. They can be mathematically very predictable, but they can always
be unintuitive.’
“Before
the vaccine: ‘Masks and distance’
“The
pandemic is far from over. It’s not even in decline. Cases of Covid-19 are on the rise in
more than 19 states, and in just one day this week, the U.S. saw more
than 40,000 new cases and more than 1,000 deaths.
“Experts
don’t expect those numbers to improve much as people move indoors for the fall
and winter. Harvard epidemiologist Michael Mina sees norms shifting as social
distancing fatigue settles in: ‘Little by little there’s going to be fewer
people wanting to sit outside, more people sitting inside,’ he says. ‘And then
people are going to say, ‘Well, you know, I was at dinner two nights ago and I
was fine. I can go to this gathering of 30 people.’ Then ‘I can go to the
gathering of 100 people.’ And it will probably be just kind of a slow … change
of opinion about what the risks are. Unfortunately, this is all occurring … at
times that coronaviruses are very likely to potentially tick up due to seasonal
effects,’ he adds.
“The
expected surge underscores the idea that Americans are not going to achieve ‘normal’
before a vaccine, not with this country’s outmatched testing system and total failure to
contact trace. The key, then, to making sure that society finds some degree of
normalcy in the meantime—meaning places like schools can stay open—continues to
be ‘masks and distance,’ says Emily Landon, chief infectious disease
epidemiologist at University of Chicago Medicine. That means avoiding places
like restaurants where you can’t wear your mask inside. Masks and distance
really work,’ she says.
“Continued
social distancing is far better than the alternative. Disease experts all
warned against White House adviser Scott Atlas’ proposal to
reopen the economy and reach herd immunity by letting natural infection tear
through the population. Not only is the idea ‘a Russian roulette plan’ that
could lead to millions—millions—of deaths, says Landon, but the strategy
might also be impossible, given that a sizeable chunk of the U.S. population is
more likely to stay home than decide it’s OK to venture out to inevitably get
infected. In that case, the United States would hover below the herd immunity
threshold while the economy stays stagnant, achieving neither of Atlas’ goals.
“There
is another possibility, says Mina. There’s been recent buzz surrounding rapid
Covid-19 antigen tests—cheap tools recently approved by the Food and Drug
Administration that can deliver results within minutes. Some experts have
questioned their utility, because they aren’t yet as accurate as more common
lab-based tests. But Mina thinks that, if they’re produced on a massive scale
and authorized for at-home use, rapid tests can help quell the pandemic in
surge areas. The idea is that people would use them not as passports to enter
crowded spaces and do things they wouldn’t ordinarily do, but as daily checks
before they go about their normal business.
“‘They
don’t have to catch everyone, because the messaging would have to be you do
exactly what you’re going to do anyway. If the test is negative, you continue
everything the same. But if the test is positive, then you definitely don’t go
out,’ he says. ‘We actually [can] use it as a tool to create herd effects so
that you have enough people who are high transmitters not transmitting.’…”
(Politico).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.