“The
health department’s politically appointed communications aides have demanded
the right to review and seek changes to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention’s weekly scientific reports charting the progress of the coronavirus
pandemic, in what officials characterized as an attempt to intimidate the
reports’ authors and water down their communications to health professionals.
“In
some cases, emails from communications aides to CDC Director Robert Redfield
and other senior officials openly complained that the agency’s reports would
undermine President Donald Trump's optimistic messages about the outbreak,
according to emails reviewed by POLITICO and three people familiar with the
situation.
“CDC officials have fought
back against the most sweeping changes, but have increasingly agreed to allow
the political officials to review the reports and, in a few cases, compromised
on the wording, according to three people familiar with the exchanges. The
communications aides’ efforts to change the language in the CDC’s reports have
been constant across the summer and continued as recently as Friday afternoon.
“CDC officials have fought
back against the most sweeping changes, but have increasingly agreed to allow
the political officials to review the reports and, in a few cases, compromised
on the wording, according to three people familiar with the exchanges. The
communications aides’ efforts to change the language in the CDC’s reports have
been constant across the summer and continued as recently as Friday afternoon.
“The
CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports are
authored by career scientists and serve as the main vehicle for the agency to
inform doctors, researchers and the general public about how Covid-19 is
spreading and who is at risk. Such reports have historically been published
with little fanfare and no political interference, said several longtime health
department officials, and have been viewed as a cornerstone of the nation's
public health work for decades.
“But
since Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign official with no medical or
scientific background, was installed in April as
the Health and Human Services department's new spokesperson, there have been
substantial efforts to align the reports with Trump's statements, including the
president's claims that fears about the outbreak are overstated, or stop the
reports altogether.
“Caputo
and his team have attempted to add caveats to the CDC's findings, including an
effort to retroactively change agency reports that they said wrongly inflated
the risks of Covid-19 and should have made clear that Americans sickened by the
virus may have been infected because of their own behavior, according to the
individuals familiar with the situation and emails reviewed by POLITICO.
“Caputo's team also has tried to halt the release of some CDC
reports, including delaying a report that addressed how doctors were
prescribing hydroxychloroquine, the malaria drug favored by Trump as a
coronavirus treatment despite scant evidence. The report, which was held for
about a month after Caputo’s team raised questions about its authors’ political
leanings, was finally published last week. It said that ‘the potential benefits
of these drugs do not outweigh their risks.’
“…CDC officials have fought the efforts to retroactively
change reports but have increasingly allowed Caputo and his team to review them
before publication, according to the three individuals with knowledge of the
situation. Caputo also helped install CDC’s interim chief of staff last month,
two individuals added, ensuring that Caputo himself would have more visibility
into an agency that has often been at odds with HHS political officials during
the pandemic…
“Caputo's team has spent
months clashing with scientific experts across the administration. Alexander
this week tried to muzzle infectious-disease
expert Anthony Fauci from speaking about the risks of the
coronavirus to children, and The Washington Post reported in July
that Alexander had criticized the CDC's methods and findings. But
public health experts told POLITICO that they were particularly alarmed that
the CDC's reports could face political interference, praising the MMWRs as
essential to fighting the pandemic…
“The efforts to
modify the CDC reports began in earnest after a May report authored by senior CDC official Anne Schuchat, which
reviewed the spread of Covid-19 in the United States and caused significant
strife within the health department. HHS officials, including Secretary Alex
Azar, believed that Schuchat was implying that the Trump administration moved
too slowly to respond to the outbreak, said two individuals familiar with the
situation…” (Dan Diamond, Politico).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.