“This academic year we are sending
258,580 Illinois children into schools that will fail to bring 60 percent of
them to grade-level by June. Of those who do graduate from high school in four
years, fewer than 20 percent will be considered ‘college ready.’ And that's
with funding to public schools in excess of $13,000 per student (not including
state funding for after-school programs, construction grants, targeted
initiatives or pension payments). Is that acceptable to you?
“Frighteningly, these statistics only
represent students enrolled in 10 percent of the state's lowest-performing
schools. But they're not outliers. The next tier of ranked schools shows
similar results: Fewer than half of the students perform at grade level. By its
own measurements, the Illinois State Board of Education says it should take
action against nearly 100 school districts for lack of yearly progress for
three or more years.
“These are not the schools to which
wealthy families or even middle-class suburbanites send their kids. They are
not the schools that Illinois' political leaders — including the governor,
House speaker and Senate president — attended. Nor are they the private schools
to which many legislators are sending their children and grandchildren. These
politicians are not wrong to choose the best education possible for their loved
ones. They are, however, wrong to steadfastly deny the same opportunity to
other children and their parents who have no voice in the big-government,
unionized system called education in Illinois.
“If we have great teachers in every
classroom and funding to the tune of $13,000 per student per year, then how do
we account for the ISBE statistic that less than half of Chicago Public Schools
students meet state standards and only 26 percent are college-ready? Or, that
the National Assessment of Educational Progress reports that nearly two-thirds
of Illinois fourth-graders do not perform at grade level in math or reading?
“Explain how 91 percent of students
fail to meet state standards in Illinois' lowest-performing school, Mark Twain
Primary in Kankakee? In the Aurora East school district, nearly 70 percent of
fourth-graders are not reading at grade level. In Rockford, more than 60 percent
of eighth-graders started school with math and reading skills below state
standards.
“The problem is systemic. In Illinois,
we have a system in which politicians and bureaucrats have too much control in
the classroom, parents have too little, and students get lost in the shuffle. The
truth is, when parents have options beyond an underperforming neighborhood
school or can move children from an average school to a great one, improved
outcomes follow. Choice leads to competition. Competition exposes inferiority
and inefficiency while spurring innovation.
“In the Midwest and across the nation,
school-choice reforms are working. Indiana students who receive school vouchers have shown
statistically significant gains in test scores, and the program has saved taxpayers
$41 million. Students participating in Wisconsin's voucher program graduate
from high school and enroll and remain in four-year colleges at a higher rate
than a carefully matched set of students in Milwaukee Public Schools. The
voucher program saved the public more than $52 million in fiscal year 2011,
making school choice not only right for families but for the state as a whole.
“In
a We Ask America poll,
commissioned by the Illinois Policy
Institute and taken this year, in six low-performing school districts, on
average more than 71 percent of parents who gave their schools a C, D or F
rating said they would use vouchers to send their child to a school of their
choosing if they could. Even when parents gave their schools an A or B, they
still wanted the ability to choose their child's school.
“That's really what this debate is
about. It's about putting parents and children ahead of government bureaucrats.
It's about ensuring that all children have an opportunity to grow and learn —
not just those whose parents can afford to leave failing schools. And, it's
about empowering parents to pick the school and method of learning that can
best meet their child's needs.”
Rep. Jeanne Ives, R-Wheaton, represents
the 42nd House District. Rep. Tom Morrison, R-Palatine, represents the 54th
House District and Rep. Joe Sosnowski, R-Rockford, represents the 69th House
District.
Commentary:
What do we know about vouchers and charter schools that Ives, Morrison
and Sosnowski did not tell you?
·
Money intended for public schools will go to
private schools (charter schools)
·
This money will be in the bank accounts of
private investors
·
Voucher proponents prefer selective admission
policies that continue the inequality, stratification, and segregation of
students (race, religion, and class or income)
·
Voucher proponents “represent the most reactionary
elements of our society”
·
Vouchers are not about “saving children” or “improving
education.” It is about destroying public education and making profits
·
Vouchers do not increase “Parental choice and
control over tax dollars”
·
“Big money” is financing this campaign
·
Voucher advocates are often referred to as “nonpartisan”
·
Koch Brothers, Eli Broad Foundation, Walton
Family Foundation, and other corporate education reformers are proponents of
vouchers and charter schools
·
Private schools have no accountability,
especially for children with disabilities
·
Privatizers do not acknowledge the role of
poverty that creates educational disadvantages
·
There are no “reliable data” that prove vouchers
and charter schools perform better than public schools; there is evidence to
the contrary, however
·
We Ask America poll, commissioned by
the Illinois Policy Institute (an organization deeply invested in charter
school chains), is questionable
·
There is no separation of church and
state in private schools
·
Vouchers have been “declared unconstitutional”
in North Carolina and Indiana; other legal debates continue
·
It has been noted there is “rampant fraud and
abuse” in many for-profit voucher programs
·
The latest Gallup Poll (2013) found that “70
percent of Americans oppose the use of public funds for religious or private
schools”
·
“The Milwaukee voucher schools have
never outperformed the public schools on state tests: Read here
and here.
The only
dispute about test scores is whether voucher students are doing the same or
worse than their peers in public schools. Read
here about some very low-performing schools in Milwaukee that have never
been held accountable”
·
“Steve
Hinnefeld analyzed Indiana’s growth scores and found that public schools
usually showed greater gains than charters or religious schools”
·
“Public school students perform as well as or
better than comparable children in private schools” (U.S. Department of
Education) Diane Ravitch, Death and Life
of the Great American School System)
·
Some charter operators are opened by “hedge-fund
managers, for-profit firms, and get-rich-quick schemers” (Ravitch)
·
Some charter schools (of choice) have been under
“federal criminal investigation for nepotism, conflicts of interest, and
financial mismanagement” (Ravitch)
·
“Enthusiasm for charter schools far outstripped research
evidence for their efficacy… Too many promises that are only, at best, weakly
supported by evidence” (Ravitch)
·
“The rhetoric of many charter school advocates
has come to sound uncannily similar to the rhetoric of voucher proponents and
of the most rabid haters of public schooling. They often sound as though they
want public schools to fail; they want to convert entire districts to charter
schools, each with its own curriculum and methods, each with its own private
management, all competing for students and public dollars” (Ravitch)
· “The charter
movement is now part of the growing privatization of public education and
Wall Street sees an emerging market. Take a look at this
piece published last fall on Forbes.com. ‘…dozens of bankers, hedge fund types
and private equity investors…’ gathered to discuss ‘…investing in for-profit
education companies…’ There’s a
potential gold rush here. Public education from kindergarten through high
school pulls in more than $500 billion in taxpayer revenues every year, and
crony capitalists and politicians alike are cashing in…” (Bill Moyers).
Please read Public Schools for Sale? (An Interview with Bill Moyers and Diane Ravitch): Click Here.
Please read Public Schools for Sale? (An Interview with Bill Moyers and Diane Ravitch): Click Here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.