“The labor movement in the United
States grew out of the need to protect the common interest of workers. For
those in the industrial sector, organized labor unions fought for better wages,
reasonable hours and safer working conditions. The labor movement led efforts
to stop child labor, give health benefits and provide aid to workers who were
injured or retired.
“The origins of the labor movement lay
in the formative years of the American nation, when a free wage-labor market
emerged in the artisan trades late in the colonial period. The earliest
recorded strike occurred in 1768 when New York
journeymen tailors protested a wage reduction. The formation of the Federal
Society of Journeymen Cordwainers (shoemakers) in Philadelphia in 1794 marks
the beginning of sustained trade union organization among American workers.
“From that time on, local craft unions
proliferated in the cities, publishing lists of ‘prices’ for their work,
defending their trades against diluted and cheap labor, and, increasingly,
demanding a shorter workday. Thus a job-conscious orientation was quick to
emerge, and in its wake there followed the key structural elements
characterizing American trade unionism–first, beginning with the formation in
1827 of the Mechanics’ Union of Trade Associations in Philadelphia, central
labor bodies uniting craft unions within a single city, and then, with the creation
of the International Typographical Union in 1852, national unions bringing
together local unions of the same trade from across the United States and
Canada (hence the frequent union designation ‘international’).
“Although the factory system was springing
up during these years, industrial workers played little part in the early trade
union development. In the nineteenth century, trade unionism was mainly a
movement of skilled workers…
“In politics, its enhanced power led
the union movement not to a new departure but to a variant on the policy of
nonpartisanship. As far back as the Progressive Era, organized labor had been
drifting toward the Democratic party, partly because of the latter’s greater
programmatic appeal, perhaps even more because of its ethno-cultural basis of support
within an increasingly ‘new’ immigrant working class.
“With the coming of Roosevelt’s New
Deal, this incipient alliance solidified, and from 1936 onward the Democratic Party
could count on–and came to rely on–the campaigning resources of the labor
movement…
“Collective bargaining performed
impressively after World War II, more than tripling weekly earnings in
manufacturing between 1945 and 1970, gaining for union workers an unprecedented
measure of security against old age, illness, and unemployment, and, through
contractual protections, greatly strengthening their right to fair treatment at
the workplace. But if the benefits were greater and if they went to more
people, the basic job-conscious thrust remained intact. Organized labor was
still a sectional movement, covering at most only a third of America’s
wage earners and inaccessible to those cut off in the low-wage secondary labor
market.
“Nothing better captures the uneasy
amalgam of old and new in the postwar labor movement than the treatment of
minorities and women who flocked in, initially from the mass production
industries, but after 1960 from the public and service sectors as well. Labor’s
historic commitment to racial and gender equality was thereby much strengthened,
but not to the point of challenging the status quo within the labor movement
itself.
“Thus the leadership structure remained
largely closed to minorities–as did the skilled jobs that were historically the
preserve of white male workers–notoriously so in the construction trades but in
the industrial unions as well... That this legislation might be directed
against discriminatory trade union practices was anticipated (and quietly
welcomed) by the more progressive labor leaders. But more significant was the
meaning they found in championing this kind of reform: the chance to act on the
broad ideals of the labor movement. And, so motivated, they deployed labor’s
power with great effect in the achievement of John F. Kennedy’s and Lyndon B.
Johnson’s domestic programs during the 1960s.
“This was ultimately economic, not
political power, however, and as organized labor’s grip on the industrial
sector began to weaken, so did its political capability. From the early 1970s
onward, new competitive forces swept through the heavily unionized industries,
set off by deregulation in communications and transportation, by industrial
restructuring, and by an unprecedented onslaught of foreign goods.
“As oligopolistic and regulated market
structures broke down, nonunion competition spurted, concession bargaining
became widespread, and plant closings decimated union memberships. The
once-celebrated National Labor Relations Act increasingly hamstrung the labor
movement; an all-out reform campaign to get the law amended failed in 1978. And
with the election of Ronald
Reagan in 1980, there came to power an
anti-union administration the likes of which had not been seen since the
Harding era.
“Between 1975 and 1985, union
membership fell by 5 million. In manufacturing, the unionized portion of the
labor force dropped below 25 percent, while mining and construction, once
labor’s flagship industries, were decimated. Only in the public sector did the
unions hold their own. By the end of the 1980s, less than 17 percent of
American workers were organized, half the proportion of the early 1950s. Swift
to change the labor movement has never been. But if the new high-tech and
service sectors seemed beyond its reach in 1989, so did the mass production
industries in 1929…
“In the meantime, however, the movement’s
impotence has been felt. ‘The collapse of labor’s legislative power facilitated
the adoption of a set of economic policies highly beneficial to the corporate
sector and to the affluent,’ wrote analyst Thomas B. Edsall in 1984. And, with
collective bargaining in retreat, declining living standards of American
wage-earning families set in for the first time since the Great Depression. The
union movement became in the 1980s a diminished economic and political force,
and, in the Age of Reagan, this made for a less socially just nation.”
For the complete article on the Labor
Movement, Click Here.
Photo: My father is in the center with his big smile and lots of dark hair.
I was in Hawaii where the natives who lived on the foggy side of the island, they were all expected to have 2 or more jobs to make ends meet. The chance of buying a house was a lottery. I saw the movie at Pearl Harbor where the attack was called a "brilliant tactical move." How far over are we expected to bend?
ReplyDelete