The Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) has been a vocal critic of Illinois charter operations which compete with neighborhood schools for critical resources and often cherry-picks students based on test scores. The law that sanctions the privately held, publicly funded charters is deeply flawed and in the wake of the UNO scandal the union and taxpayers have continued to lobby lawmakers to do something about it.
Thus,
CTU, along with a number of education advocates, parents and others, currently
backs several pieces of legislation under consideration in Springfield that
will bring significant reforms to unstable charter movement in Illinois,
including a bill calling for the elimination of the Illinois State Charter
School Commission.
“Tax
payers are demanding more accountability from charter operators; they want to
know whether the money going to these schools is actually being spent on
educating students,” said CTU President Karen Lewis, NBCT. “With all of this
talk of school choice there is surprisingly little information about their
students’ rates of graduation, drop out or push out from these organizations.
The law as its currently written totally undermines the authority of the
Illinois State Board of Education and gives it to a shadow commission with
little to no oversight. This is unacceptable in the nation’s third largest
school district.”
Charter
operations not only lack accountability but with little to no innovation in
pedagogy they also fail to outperform CPS’s traditional schools, according to
research. Another crucial and little-known element of charter
proliferation is the large financial windfall that can flow toward investors
such as billionaire political hopeful Bruce Rauner. The would-be governor
has given about $2.5 million to Noble Street, which has 8,850 students, 98
percent of whom are minorities and 89 percent who come from low-income
families. A campus bears his name. His family foundation has also given about
$4 million to other organizations that operate or support charter schools.
A
vocal opponent of public education and unionized teachers, Rauner once floated
a scheme that would call for the transferring of public wealth and resources to
private hands throughout extreme leverage (debt) similar to financial
structures that led to the Great Recession in 2008. In 2010, he
instigated a plan that would raise $200 million in equity, borrow $600 million
and purchase 100 CPS schools that the investor group would then lease to
charter operators. In such a plan, the investor group would reap two benefits:
First, they would receive steady streams of revenue from the leases, and
second, they could claim tax credits from depreciation on the buildings.
In short, the public would ultimately pay to lease back its own buildings.
Such
schemes have made charter proliferation big business in Illinois. While CPS
cited budgetary reasons for closing and consolidating scores of neighborhood
schools, their own charter proliferation policies have caused unnecessary
expenditures. Here is a look at current legislation pending in the
General Assembly of which the CTU supports:
1.
SB2627/HB3754: Eliminates the Illinois State Charter School Commission
Senate
Sponsor: Sen. Kimberly Lightford (D) |
House Sponsor: Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia (D) Co-sponsors: Sen.
J. Collins (D) | Rep. Kifowit (D), Rep. Pritchard (R), Rep.
Cassidy (D), Rep. Williams (D) and Rep. Dunkin (D), Rep. Cabello (R), Rep.
Martwick (D), Rep. B. Mitchell (R), Rep. Davidsmeyer (R), Rep. Hoffman (D),
Rep. Meier (R), Rep. Golar (D), Rep. Berrios (D), Rep. Flynn Currie (D), Rep.
Ford (D), Rep. Turner (D), Rep. Flowers (D), Rep. Mayfield (D), Rep. T. Jones
(D), Rep. Mayfield (D), Rep. D. Davis (D). Rep. A. Brown (R).
What
this bill does: Seeks to eliminate
the Illinois State Charter School Commission and return its functions to the
State Board of Education (ISBE).
Rationale: The
State Charter School Commission (SCSC) is an initiative of the American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to promote the expansion of charter
schools, especially in suburban areas where there is little support for
charters. The SCSC eliminates local control of schools by providing a second
application round for charter schools. Charters whose applications are denied
by the local school board can appeal to the SCSC for approval. Two Chicago
charter schools linked to the Turkish Gulen movement were approved in this
manner, and a Sun-Times investigation found
that these schools had significant conflicts of interest regarding contracts
and expansion.
2.
SB2779/HB4237: Diminishes authority of State Charter School Commission by
mandating a referendum
Senate
Sponsor: Sen. Linda Holmes (D) | House
Sponsor: Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia (D) Co-sponsors: Rep.
Kifowit (D), Rep. Pritchard (R), and Rep. Dunkin (D)
What
this bill does: Would require a voter referendum for
any charter approved by ISBE or the State Charter Commission. The municipal
election would take place in the district where the charter would be approved.
Rationale: The
bill provides for voter approval for charter schools that have been approved
over the wishes of the local school board. It is an additional mechanism to
return control over district policy to local school boards.
3.
HB 6005/SB 3030: Charter School Accountability Act
Senate
Sponsor: Senator Jacqueline Collins | House
Sponsor: Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
What
this bill does: Requires the charter school
authorizer to host charter school lotteries (rather than the school)
·
Provides that a charter school waiting list must be centrally administered by
the authorizer
·
Prohibits a charter school from creating any admissions process subsequent to a
lottery
·
Requires the authorizer to inform the next parent or guardian on the waiting
list in the event that a student transfers from a charter school
·
Prohibits future charter schools from contracting with for-profit EMO/CMOs
·
Mandates that the physical property of the charter school is owned by charter
not EMO/CMO
·
Forbids an employee to be employed by both a EMO/CMO and charter school
·
Mandates that charters pay pro-rated portion of funding for student who leaves
to the new school district
·
Prohibits charter schools from spending public funds on marketing
·
Charter is subject to an audit by auditor general administrative costs are 20%
greater than those of the host district
·
Requires a charter assessment report every 5 years
·
Includes funding limits if charters are not in compliance with reporting
regulations
·
Creates a compensation cap for charter school CEOs—compensation cannot be
greater than 80% of the compensation of the school district superintendent
·
Creates a compensation cap for charter school principals—compensation cannot be
greater than 10% more than the average compensation of principals in the
district
Rationale: The
UNO charter school scandal identified important weaknesses in the current law
that have yet to be remedied and provide opportunities for future abuse. These
reasonable regulations ensure a level governance playing field between charters
and traditional public schools.
4.
SB 3303: Limits charter expansion in areas where public schools have been
closed
Sponsor: Senator
Jacqueline Collins
What
this bill does: Provides that
no charter can be granted within the same zip code, or neighboring zip code, in
which a public school was closed within 10 school years.
·
Provides that no charter must be granted unless the General Assembly has
appropriated transition impact aid for the school district where the charter
school is to be located.
·
Provides that CPS designate attendance boundaries for Chicago charter schools.
Rationale: In
the wake of the largest mass school closure in US history and the subsequent
approval of 18 new charter schools, this law would provide crucial limits on
future charter school openings by ensuring that any new campuses opened only
where needed and when resources are available.
5.
HB3745: Requires all charter high schools to establish vocational academies
Sponsor: Rep.
LaShawn Ford (D)
What
this bill does: Requires all alternative schools and
charter high schools to establish vocational academies for students in grades
10-12.
Rationale: True
career readiness requires access to experiential job training that only
vocational education can provide.
6.
HB4655/SB3004: Applies sections of the School Code that pertain to student
discipline policies to charter schools
House
Sponsor: Rep. Will Davis (D) / Senate
Sponsor: Senator Kimberly Lightford (D) Co-Sponsor: Rep.
Rita Mayfield (D)/ Senator Jacqueline Collins
What
this bill does: Amends the school code as it pertains
to school discipline policies, and seeks to apply sections of the school code
disciplinary policy to charter schools. The bill seeks to redefine what school
behavior rises to the level of expulsion or suspension, sets limitations on
out-of-school suspensions, in-school arrests, and requires behavioral support
services and alternative educational services to be provided to certain
students. The bill also provides that a student may not be issued a monetary
fine or fee as a disciplinary consequence.
Rationale:
Charter schools should be held to the same discipline standards as traditional
public schools. Fines and harshly punitive discipline measures have resulted in
an expulsion rate in Chicago charters that is 12 times the expulsion rate in
public schools. These discipline actions have a disproportionate racial impact,
as Latino and especially Black students are subject to such discipline at far
greater rates than white students.
7.
HB4527: Mandates charter school compliance with state and federal SPED and ELL
laws
Sponsor: Rep.
Linda Chapa LaVia (D)
What
this bill does: Requires charter schools to comply with
all federal and state laws and rules applicable to public schools that pertain
to special education and the instruction of English language learners.
8.
HB 5328: Mandates Chicago charter schools be administered by a local school
council
Sponsor: Rep.
Elizabeth Hernandez (D)
What
this bill does: Requires a school that is initially
placed on academic watch status after a fourth annual calculation or that
remains on academic watch status after a fifth annual calculation to be
approved by the school board and by the school's local school council, if
applicable.
Rationale: Parents
and community members should have a role in the governance of institutions that
receive public money and claim to be public schools. This bill ensures that
parents have meaningful roles in charter school operations.
9.
HB 5887: Creates restrictions on virtual school options for students
Sponsor: Rep.
Chapa La Via
What
this bill does: Provides that the State Charter School
Commission must require Commission-authorized virtual charter schools to (1)
ensure student access to teachers and report to the local school board or
boards information regarding teacher accessibility, the teacher/student ratio,
and the amount of teacher/student contact time; (2) provide opportunities for
peer interaction and collaboration; and (3) adopt protocols to prevent bullying
or other inappropriate online behavior. Sets forth requirements and limitations
that the Commission must impose with regard to entities proposing virtual
charter schools.
·
With respect to Commission-authorized virtual charter schools, requires the
Commission to limit the withholding of State funds from a school district in
proportion to the per pupil expenditure used for building maintenance,
classroom supplies, transportation, safety and security, and other costs unique
to brick-and-mortar schools.
·
With respect to all Commission-authorized charter schools, provides that the
Commission must require that proof of continuing enrollment and attendance be
submitted quarterly, with prorated refunds to the school district upon
withdrawal of students from the charter school.
10.
HB4591: Requires funding to follow charter students who transfer to district
schools
Sponsor: Rep.
Martwick (D)
What
this bill does: Provides that if a charter school
dismisses a student from the charter school after receiving a quarterly payment
from the school district, the charter school must return to the school district
on a pro rata basis, for the time the student is not enrolled at the charter
school.
Rationale: Because
of high dismissal rates, charters are able to keep funds for students they no
longer educate. Such funding should follow the student if that student
transfers from a charter to another charter school or to a public school.
from Martin Ritter, Chicago Teachers Union
Local 1 AFT - IFT
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.