Monday, May 5, 2014

The So-Called Advanced Placement Student at the University or What Is the Value of AP Courses and Tests Anyway? by Glen Brown




In early May, high school students across the nation take their Advanced Placement Tests so they can receive college credits. Indeed, to save college tuition is advantageous; however, sometimes not enrolling in general education classes, such as Composition 101, is disadvantageous for students.





I taught high school seniors the Advanced Placement Literature and Composition course for several years before retiring. After retirement, I taught former Advanced Placement students who placed out of the three-credit hour composition (or WRIT 101) course at Benedictine University. These students enrolled in a one-credit hour symposium entitled WRIT 104. I taught a total of 16 sections while at BU.

Generally speaking, some of these students should never have been exempted from WRIT 101, despite their Advanced Placement score! Some of them lack critical reading, writing, listening, speaking and researching skills. Furthermore, they have graduated from high schools with diverse Advanced Placement Programs. Unfortunately, all Advanced Placement Programs are not created equal. 

Though we have several in-class and online discussions but only one formally written persuasive essay (in a class that meets one hour per week), I have discovered that some of my students lack an understanding of the deeper, more symbolic meanings of a text as well as the ability to critically comprehend a complex essay in order to assess its relevance and rhetorical style in making an argument.

Some of my students cannot produce focused, insightful analyses. Moreover, some of them lack the necessary proficiency to evaluate the varying degrees of quality and authenticity in sources; to synthesize information that supports a purpose; and to integrate pertinent research in a coherent, well-supported argumentative essay. 

It is disappointing when some Advanced Placement students cannot distinguish between facts and opinions, relevant and irrelevant claims, or factual accuracy and fallacious reasoning. 

It is unacceptable when some Advanced Placement students do not demonstrate an understanding of the writing process by carefully proofreading their writing for errors and omissions of both form and substance; by revising and restructuring where ideas are poorly organized or where evidence is lacking; and by correcting for errors in syntax, usage, punctuation, spelling and style.

At $89 per test with an $8 rebate granted to the sponsoring school for each test taken at high schools across the nation, one might deduce that Advanced Placement testing is simply a corporate, multi-billion-dollar enterprise without educational value. 

-Glen Brown


So, What Is the Value of AP Courses and Tests? “High school rankings by popular media usually take into account how many students take AP exams. Some high schools push students to take AP courses whether or not they are prepared, just to satisfy the rankings. But are the AP courses an appropriate measure of high quality? 



“A few of the nation’s top private and public high schools have dropped the AP courses, on the belief that their teachers created better courses than the AP. [Click here and here for archives of two New York Times articles].


“A reader responded to an earlier post about the Tucson BASIS charter schools by questioning the value of AP courses and tests: ‘Here is the essence of what Tim Steller wrote about BASIS-Tuscon: ‘the Basis schools require students to take eight AP courses before graduation, take six AP tests and pass at least one…That naturally helps Basis place high in the U.S. News rankings…’ Steller adds this important point in his article about BASIS, made by an education consultant: ‘AP has pulled the wool over people’s eyes across the nation…’ 


“‘Actually, it’s the College Board that has ‘pulled the wool over people’s eyes.’ About AP, to be sure. But also about the SAT and PSAT, and Accuplacer, the placement test used by more than 60 percent of community colleges. They’re all mostly worthless, more hype than reality… 


“A 2002 National Research Council study of AP courses and tests found them to be a ‘mile wide and an inch deep’ and inconsistent with research-based principles of learning. A 2004 study by Geiser and Santelices found that ‘the best predictor of both first- and second-year college grades’ is un-weighted high school grade point average, and a high school grade point average ‘weighted with a full bonus point for AP…is invariably the worst predictor of college performance.’ 


“A 2005 study (Klopfenstein and Thomas) found AP students ‘…generally no more likely than non-AP students to return to school for a second year or to have higher first semester grades.’ Moreover, the authors wrote that ‘close inspection of the [College Board] studies cited reveals that the existing evidence regarding the benefits of AP experience is questionable,’ and ‘AP courses are not a necessary component of a rigorous curriculum.’


“A 2006 MIT faculty report noted ‘there is a growing body of research that students who earn top AP scores and place out of institute introductory courses end up having ‘difficulty’ when taking the next course.’ 


“Two years prior, Harvard ‘conducted a study that found students who are allowed to skip introductory courses because they have passed a supposedly equivalent AP course do worse in subsequent courses than students who took the introductory courses at Harvard’ (Seebach, 2004)… 


“Students know that AP is far more about gaming the college acceptance process than it is learning…


“The 2010 book ‘AP: A Critical Examination’ noted that ‘Students see AP courses on their transcripts as the ticket ensuring entry into the college of their choice,’ yet, ‘there is a shortage of evidence about the efficacy, cost, and value of these programs.’ And this: AP has become ‘the juggernaut of American high school education,’ but ‘the research evidence on its value is minimal.’


“As [Saul] Geiser* (2007) notes, ‘systematic differences in student motivation, academic preparation, family background and high-school quality account for much of the observed difference in college outcomes between AP and non-AP students...’ 


“Klopfenstein and Thomas (2010) find that when these demographic characteristics are controlled for, the claims made for AP disappear. Yet, the myths –– especially about AP, the SAT and PSAT –– endure. 


“Meanwhile, the College Board is promoting the Common Core and says it has ‘aligned’ (cough, wink) its products with it. And people believe it. Stopping corporate-style ‘reform and the Common Core is easier said than done. Parents, students and educators are going to have to remove the wool from over their eyes. And that means abandoning blind belief in the College Board and the products it peddles.’”


Quotations are from What Is the Value of AP Courses and Tests? (Diane Ravitch's Blog)



*“[In Geiser’s and Veronica Santelice’s 2004 study that] examine[d] the role of Advanced Placement (AP) and other honors-level courses as a criterion for admission at… the University of California, the number of AP and honors courses taken in high school bears little or no relationship to students’ later performance in college. AP is increasingly emphasized as a factor in admissions, particularly at selective colleges and universities. But while student performance on AP examinations is strongly related to college performance, merely taking AP or other honors-level courses in high school is not a valid indicator of the likelihood that students will perform well in college. These findings suggest that institutions may need to reconsider the use of AP as a criterion in admissions, particularly given the marked disparity in access to AP and honors courses among disadvantaged and underrepresented minority students” (The Role Of Advanced Placement And Honors Courses In College Admissions)].



I was recently criticized on Facebook for re-posting this opinion article in 2018 and for not updating my sources. Though most of what I have stated needs no updates, here is a succinct update:  

Though taking a rigorous AP class can be a positive academic experience, many AP classes are not a true measure of high quality, and there is simply no way to determine the value of the high-stakes test scores.  Many students come from high schools that do not have competent and challenging programs. These students are entering colleges and universities without time management, study and note-taking skills and aptitudes for critical thinking, writing and analysis. To make matters worse, high schools across the nation are allowing more and more students - who are often apathetic and unprepared - to enroll in these AP classes for the wrong reasons as well: to assuage parental demands, to save college tuition, to avoid taking essential Freshman courses, and to impress college admissions.

Furthermore, “Questions about the A.P. program’s purpose [and their monopoly for granting college level credits] are complicated further by the fact that it provides a not-insignificant amount of revenue for the College Board. Of the College Board’s total $916 million in revenue in 2015, $408 million came from fees for the test and instructional materials. [This year, the test fee will be $94.]…” (Tugend). Consider the College Board is also “a billion-dollar-a-year corporation which uses its excess revenue—and they are substantial over its cost—to build fancy buildings down on Wall Street and to pay its executives high six figure, if not seven figure salaries’” (Dwyer).  


Bibliography:

Dwyer, Liz. “The Standardized Test Monopoly that Secretly Runs America’s High Schools.” Good Education. 14 May 2017. 22 December 2018 https://education.good.is/features/ap-classes-a-scam-or-smart-move

“Our schools will get rid of AP courses. Here’s why.” Editorial. Washington Post.com 18 June 2018. 22 December 2018 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/our-schools-got-rid-of-ap-courses-heres-why/2018/06/18/24018654-7316-11e8-9780-b1dd6a09b549_story.html?utm_term=.eebeaa582896


Tugend, Alina. “Who Benefits from the Expansion of AP Classes?” The New York Times Magazine. 7 Sept. 2017. 22 December 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/magazine/who-benefits-from-the-expansion-of-ap-classes.html

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Hotline for Rauner to Expose Political Crimes? Are You Kidding? By John Dillon






“…Rauner Says If You’ve Seen Something Illegal, Call Me!

“The Illinois Review, always a purveyor of items Tea Party, announced a short time ago that GOP candidate Bruce Rauner has ‘launched a statewide whistleblower tip line for citizens’ who want to report corruption, misuse of state funds, etc.  Click Here.


“…If you spot your current Governor up to no good, you can call Rauner’s new HOTLINE:  855-PAT-TIPS.  If you prefer using the promised veil of technology, you can also email Bruce with your concerns at stopcorruption@brucerauner.com.  

“In actuality, Rauner is trying to ride the crest of the latest wave of investigations into fund mismanagement of Quinn’s anti-violence programs in Chicago, a carelessly run democratic operation possibly misappropriating untold amounts of money on ineffectual programs to provide cultural opportunities for children in high crime areas.

“…Here’s a modest (and much better) proposal for a possible crime by current politician(s).  How about a Governor who ignored his oath of office, his refusal to uphold Article XIII, Section 5 of the Illinois Constitution to keep a legal promise and not diminish or impair the contractual guarantee for workers once they began employment with the State?

“I called the HOTLINE tonight, and I even emailed my concerns as well.  I certainly hope you will do the same… In fact, I know many, many legislators who ignored their oaths and acted in a less than legal manner - in my opinion.  Nekritz?  Biss?  M. Davis?  Lou Lang?  Emil Jones?  [Michael Connelly?] Ecetera.

“Hello, Bruce Rauner.  My name is John Dillon, and I am reporting corruption in Illinois politics at the highest levels.  Governor Pat Quinn, along with members of the Senate and House, passed an unconstitutional bill called SB1 which ignores the earned rights of public workers, threatens the promised futures of current workers as well as current retirees, and avoids the contractual guarantees provided by the Illinois Constitution.  I really hope you will do something about this, Bruce, but I notice that you are not saying anything about it on your website.  I hope you’ll explain your position clearly, Bruce, and explain how you are a better choice for the many hundred thousands of us in the public sector service area.  Thanks, Bruce…”

from Hotline for Rauner to Expose Political Crimes? Are You Kidding? By John Dillon 
"The number 855-pat tips does work.  The other is not working" (Dillon).

Fred Klonsky:


“I’m no fan of Bruce Rauner, but he has come up with a good idea. If you see the corruption and theft of the public, report what you see to a hot-line number: 1 800 728 8477.
 
“Of course, Rauner is using it to try and embarrass the Governor. But why be so limited? What has been the biggest example of corruption and the theft of public money in Illinois history?

“Of course, Public employee pension theft. Quinn signed Senate Bill 1.

“Rauner wants to turn our defined-benefit pensions into a Wall Street ponzi scheme, and Rahm wants to rob city employees of their pensions to fund his private development give-aways.

“Don’t just sit there. Everyone who reads this should call the tip-line and report this corruption: 1 800 728 8477. ‘Tip: Rauner, Rahm and Quinn are stealing our pensions.’

“Flood the tip-line with calls.
“Thanks Bruce. Great idea!”

From Report Rahm, Rauner and Quinn to the Illinois theft and corruption hot-line


Friday, May 2, 2014

Online Training for Conceal Carry Would Be Insufficient Instruction

















“An Aurora firearms training facility wants to see online concealed carry courses replace classroom training required by Illinois state law. Currently, those wishing to be issued concealed carry permits must complete 16 hours of training. Half of that training is done in the classroom, and the other half is hands-on instruction. The two-day class can cost hundreds of dollars, and might not be the most efficient way of doing things, suggests Patty Walker, a senior instructor at Firearm Training Pros in Aurora. Walker outlined her proposal to change state law to allow an eight-hour online training course, in addition to the eight hours of hands-on training…” (Aurora facility seeks onlineconcealed carry training).

 
Regarding Firearms Training: A Commentary

The training requirement for an applicant to conceal carry should be at least 24 hours (two weekends), of which at least six hours should be live-fire instruction. Effective instruction should appeal to visual, aural, verbal, kinesthetic (hands-on training), and interpersonal (or peer) learning.

Online instruction is a solitary experience. It would not be effective for most learners and would deprive trainees of other valuable methods of instruction.

At a minimum, firearms training curriculum should cover the following: Firearm Safety, Understanding Pistol Components and Operation, Loading & Firing a Pistol, Role-playing Stressful Self-Defense Scenarios that Create Fear and Confusion, Loading and Firing a Pistol under Stress, Unloading/Reloading a Pistol, Drawing from a Holster, Fundamentals of Aiming & Firing, Proper Breathing Techniques, Pistol Maintenance and Storage, Clearing Common Pistol Stoppages, Dry-Fire & Live-Fire Practice, Home Self-Defense Strategies, Self-Defense Strategies Outside of the Home, Understanding the Defensive Use & Consequences of Deadly Force, Confronting an Intruder or Attacker, the Emotional & Legal After Effects of Shooting an Assailant, Understanding State & Federal Laws Governing the Carry & Use of Firearms… 


I remain concerned about people who have only two days of training and who also lack experience with firearms (but decide to carry anyway). Carrying a firearm entails profound responsibility and the ability to act instantaneously under extreme stress with self-restraint.  

Though 16 hours of firearms training is the state’s requisite requirement for concealed carry, it takes many hours of shooting practice to enhance proficiency. Without real self-defense experiences, it is imperative to have practice lessons that include multiple visualizations of possible self-defense scenarios and to discuss the physical and emotional ramifications of the use of deadly force in self-defense.

People who own and carry guns should continue practicing at a firing range at least once a month, in addition to studying and reviewing the principles of the aforementioned curriculum on their own.