10. Illinois Pension Reform Is Without Legal and Moral
Justification (Dec. 1st)
…To possess a right to a promised deferred
compensation, such as a pension, is to assert a legitimate claim with all
Illinois legislators to protect that right. There are no rights without
obligations. They are mutually dependent. Fulfilling a contract is a legal and
moral obligation justified by trust among elected officials and their
constituents… Click Here.
9. A Response to Today's Chicago Tribune Editorial about
So-called “Pension Reform” (Nov. 20th)
…What is needed to solve the budget problems in Illinois is a
better revenue base to pay the state’s self-induced debts. What is easier
to do is to evade serious problem solving of the budget issue and to
incriminate the state’s public employees… Click Here.
8. On the Convening of the 98th Illinois General Assembly
Today and Senate Bill 1 (Jan. 9th)
…I listened to the speeches re-nominating Michael Madigan as
Speaker of the House by five sycophantic members of the House of
Representatives. I listened to their gushing platitudes and absurd hyperboles,
and to the polite applause that followed… Click Here.
7. On Breaking a Contract or
So-called Illinois “Pension Reform” and Giving the Money to Corporations (Oct.
5th)
"The power of changing the relative situation of debtor
and creditor, of interfering with contracts, a power which comes home to every
man, touches the interest of all, and controls the conduct of every individual
in those things which he supposes to be proper for his own exclusive
management, had been used to such an excess by the state legislatures, as to
break in upon the ordinary intercourse of society, and destroy all confidence
between man and man…” (Chief Justice Marshall)... Click Here.
6. Governor Quinn met with labor union representatives about
so-called “pension reform” last week (Oct. 15th)
…The promise to honor commitments and pay for the public
employees’ pension is of “sufficient importance” to all citizens of Illinois.
To pass pension reform is “an unequivocal manifestation of intention not to
perform… legal duties…under a contract… When there is a duty of immediate
performance of a promise, failure to perform in full is a breach…” (Professor
of Law, Emeritus, Claude D. Rohwer and Professor of Law, Emeritus, Anthony M.
Skrocki, Contracts in a Nutshell)… Click Here.
5. Beware of the Trojan Horse that is SB 2404 (May 17th)
…Though there are thousands of
retirees across the state who will sink deeply into abject poverty without
their compounded COLA, partially-paid-for health care or both, Cullerton and
the Coalition of Unions are offering a choice for us to keep our compounded
COLA, which is constitutionally guaranteed, or diminish this benefit
voluntarily for “access” to a state health care program (that is under payment
revision) and one that we will most likely have to subsidize fully before
long... Click Here.
4. 12 pragmatic and legal reasons to reject Illinois pension
reform (May 17th)
…“Most states…
cannot readily reduce their existing pension obligations to their employees in
an effort to solve a fiscal crisis, and until recently few even tried… It is
worth noting the inequity inherent in cutting pensions promised to state and
local public servants based on alleged underfunding that was substantially
caused, in many cases, by funding ‘holidays…’ [Approximately $15 billion was
stolen from the Teachers Retirement of Illinois. This amount does not include
the possible investment income that would have been earned]” (Douglas L.
Greenfield and Lahne, Susan G. (2012), How
Much Can States Change Existing Retirement Policy? In Defense of State Judicial
Decisions Protecting Public Employees’ Pensions)… Click Here.
3. Constitutional Issues Concerning Senate Bill 2404 (May 8th)
…Approximately 35,000 retirees are
being deprived of an earned and promised benefit. They were not represented at the
table when Cullerton and the Coalition made their agreement. They were excluded
from the process that affects them. It’s ironic that it is the legislators who
owe the outstanding obligations and not the public employees and retirees,
and that Cullerton and the Coalition have decided public employees and
retirees will provide consideration for the debt. Click Here.
2. Madigan’s and Cullerton’s letter is an example of
hypocrisy and irony (July 30th)
“…We write to inform you that [if and when you pass 'pension
reform'] we will file a lawsuit challenging [your unconstitutional actions, for
they are] purely political, [opportunistic] and an unconstitutional attempt to
coerce [public employees] to comply with [your] demands. This matter is of
fundamental constitutional importance, as ['pension reform'] threatens [retired
and current public employees’ earned rights and benefits]. The Illinois Constitution
protects [these rights and benefits…]” Click Here.
1. Illinois Senate Bill 1, the So-called “Pension Reform”
Bill (or Attempt to Break a Constitutional Contract with Public Employees and
Retirees) (Dec. 2nd)
…SB 1 is a foul,
insensitive attack on public employees’ and retirees’ rights to
constitutionally-guaranteed benefits. An unconscionable challenge of those
rights and benefits is a serious threat, not only to current public employees
and retirees and their families but, to every Illinois citizen. A pension is a
contract. Breaking a contract can never be legally or morally justified… Click Here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.