“These private
insurer-run plans are more expensive AND lead to worse outcomes for patients,”
said Rep. Pramila Jayapal. “It’s time to rein in Medicare DisAdvantage and
protect traditional Medicare.”
A report
released earlier this month to little fanfare estimated that federal
overpayments to privately run Medicare Advantage plans
could total $76 billion this year—or potentially a staggering $1.2 trillion over the next decade if
current trends persist.
The Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission (MedPAC), an independent congressional agency that advises
lawmakers on Medicare, calculates overpayments by comparing spending on Medicare Advantage (MA)
plans to what the federal government would have spent if MA enrollees were on
traditional fee-for-service Medicare.
In a report published earlier this month, MedPAC showed
that overpayments to MA plans this year are projected to be around $76 billion.
Roughly $22 billion of that total is due to coding practices by MA providers,
which are notorious for making patients appear sicker than they
are to receive larger payments from the federal government. MA plans are paid
lump sums to cover expected future healthcare services
for patients based on their risk scores.
Another factor
driving overpayments to MA plans—which now cover 55% of eligible Medicare
beneficiaries—is a phenomenon known as favorable selection. MA enrollees tend
to be healthier on average than recipients of traditional Medicare, resulting
in higher payments to Medicare Advantage plans than are necessary based on
patients’ healthcare needs.
According to
MedPAC, favorable selection will account for $57 billion of the expected
overpayments to MA plans this year. The Trump
administration gave Medicare Advantage plans a more than $25 billion boost in federal payments for
2026, even amid mounting bipartisan concerns about fraud in the program.
The National
Committee to Preserve Social Security and
Medicare (NCPSSM) said the MedPAC analysis “confirms that these private
plans are bleeding taxpayers for billions of dollars more than traditional
Medicare would cost for comparable enrollees.”
US Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) wrote in
response to the MedPAC findings that “Medicare DisAdvantage will rip off
American taxpayers to the tune of $76 billion in 2026.”
“These private
insurer-run plans are more expensive AND lead to worse outcomes for patients,”
Jayapal, a leading supporter of Medicare for All legislation
in the House, wrote in a social media post.
“It’s time to rein in Medicare DisAdvantage and protect traditional Medicare.”
The MedPAC
analysis was released days after Republicans on the
Senate Judiciary Committee published a report revealing how UnitedHealth Group, the largest
provider of MA plans in the US, “has turned risk adjustment into a major
profit-centered strategy,” reaping massive payments from the federal government
through upcoding.
NCPSSM noted
that “while UnitedHealth... has emerged as the worst offender, it’s abundantly
clear that many MA insurers are engaged in these shady practices.”
“Look no
further than insurers’ reliance on prior authorizations for procedures and
treatments that normally would be automatically covered in traditional
Medicare,” the group said. “This includes denying skilled nursing
care that jeopardizes older patients who have nowhere else to turn.”
-Jake Johnson,
Common Dreams

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.