It turns out Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and
House Democrats were right to call it the “Epstein Shutdown” for the last
several weeks on social media and in interviews. As Marc Elias of Democracy
Docket put it today, while it was clear what the Democrats wanted
from the shutdown—lower costs for healthcare insurance premiums, affordability,
and for Trump to stop breaking the law—it was never clear what the Republicans
wanted. They seemed simply to be doing as Trump demanded.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) kept House members from conducting any business at all. The House last voted on September 19, gathering in Washington, D.C., again only after the Senate on Monday passed a measure to reopen the government.
The hiatus gave Johnson an excuse not to
swear in Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), whose voters elected her
on September 23. Grijalva had promised to be the 218th and final vote on a
discharge petition that would force the House to vote on a measure that would
require the Department of Justice to release files relating to the government
investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Elias notes that he, like many of us, considered as
plausible the idea that the government shutdown was a way to keep the Epstein
files under wraps, but there were other plausible theories as well. Maybe Trump
and his cronies wanted to gut the federal workforce. Maybe they wanted to
undermine the Affordable Care Act. Maybe Trump simply wanted to run the country
without the interference of Congress.
Today put the Epstein files firmly in the center of the story. The House got down to business this morning after a 54-day break to work on the Senate measure to reopen the government. Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform immediately released three emails from a cache of more than 23,000 documents the committee received recently from the Epstein estate.
The first email was one Epstein sent
to his associate Ghislaine Maxwell on April 2, 2011. It referred to a
story in which the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes solved a case by noting
that a dog didn’t bark at a crime scene because it knew the perpetrator. The
reference has come to mean an expected action or piece of evidence whose
absence proves guilt.
Epstein wrote: “i want you to realize that that dog that
hasn’t barked is trump. [VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has
never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75% there.” Maxwell replied:
“I have been thinking about that…”
The second email the Democrats released was from January
2019, from Epstein to Trump biographer Michael Wolff. In it, Epstein said of
Trump: “of course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop[.]”
In a third email thread from December 2015, after
Trump had declared his candidacy for the 2016 presidential election, Wolff told
Epstein that CNN would ask Trump about his relationship with Epstein. Epstein
asked what Wolff thought Trump should answer. Wolff wrote: “I think you should
let him hang himself. If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house,…
[y]ou can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for
you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a
debt.”
As legal analyst Asha Rangappa noted, this exchange
suggests that Epstein would have leverage over Trump if Trump tried to say he
had not been at Epstein’s house or on his plane, in other words, that Trump was
there and Epstein had receipts.
After the Democrats released these three emails, Johnson
called the release “[a]nother publicity stunt by the Democrats” and claimed:
“They’re trying to mislead people.” Committee chair James Comer (R-KY) issued a
statement accusing the Democrats of “cherry-picking documents and politicizing
information.” The committee then released an additional 20,000 pages of
documents received from the Epstein estate.
Those were hardly better. In a 2015 email, Epstein gave
tips on stories about Trump and girls to then–New York Times financial
reporter Landon Thomas Jr. When others asked Thomas for stories, Epstein wrote:
“Have them ask my houseman about donad [sic] almost walking through the door
leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool
and he was so focused he walked straight into the door.” In another email,
Epstein offered “photso [sic] of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen,”
and Thomas urged: “I am serious man—for the good of the nation why not try to
get some of this out there.”
But a story revealing this information did not appear in the New York Times before the 2016 presidential election or afterward. In one 2018 email referring to Trump’s payment of hush money to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, Epstein wrote: “i know how dirty donald is.”
Despite how explosive these documents were, they do not
appear to be the end of the story. They came from the Epstein estate, but the
files from the FBI investigation into Trump have not yet been released.
Whatever is still outstanding appears to be even worse than what we have seen,
as evidenced by Trump’s frantic attempts to stop the discharge petition.
With the House back at work, Johnson had little choice but to swear in Grijalva. The ceremony was scheduled for 4:00. In the hours before that deadline, the president tried to get one of the four Republican representatives who had signed the discharge petition to remove their signature.
He appeared to focus on Nancy Mace (R-SC), with whom he tried to connect by phone, and Lauren Boebert (R-CO), whom he invited to meet with him in the White House Situation Room, which is equipped to prevent recording. CNN reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and FBI director Kash Patel joined Trump and Boebert at the meeting.
When asked about the meeting, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: “Doesn’t that show the level of transparency when we are willing to sit down with members of Congress and address their concerns?”
For his part, Trump took to social media to call the released
documents an attempt by Democrats to bring up the “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax” to
deflect from “how badly they’ve done on the Shutdown, and so many other
subjects.” He urged “any Republicans involved” to be “focused only on opening
up our Country, and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats!”
Trump’s efforts to get someone to take their name off the
discharge petition failed. Johnson swore in Grijalva at 4:00, as scheduled, and
she immediately signed it. Now the petition needs to “ripen” for seven
legislative days. Then Johnson has two legislative days to schedule a vote on a
measure to require the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files it
holds.
Faith Wardwell and Meredith Lee Hill of Politico reported this evening that senior Republicans believe as many as 100 Republicans will support the bill when it comes to the floor. Many of them are facing constituents who voted for Trump in the belief that he would release the Epstein files as he promised and who are angry that the administration appears to be covering them up in the service of rich elites.
Others likely recognize that they do not want to be seen as participating in that coverup, especially with the threat of even worse material waiting to drop. If the House passes the bill, it will go to the Senate and, if the Senate passes it, to Trump for his signature. If he vetoes it, Congress has the option to override his veto.
In the past, Trump has managed to avoid accountability
for his actions by using lawsuits to delay while whipping up his supporters to
take his side against what he called “witch hunts” or “hoaxes.” Republican
lawmakers went along in part because they didn’t want to alienate his base.
Now, though, a significant portion of MAGA has broken
with him, his popularity is low—a new Associated Press–NORC poll has his
approval rating at 33%— and last week’s elections showed his coalition is
abandoning him. It is not clear that Republican senators will defend him,
especially since his erratic behavior—like bulldozing the East Wing of the
White House—appears to be increasing.
As Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY), who backed the
House discharge petition, told CNN: “This vote is going to be on your record
for longer than Trump is going to be president. And what are you going to do in
2028 and 2030 when you’re in a debate…and they say, ‘How can we trust you? You
covered up for a pedophile back in 2025.’”
Midday today, as new revelations from the Epstein
documents were hitting social media every few minutes, Representative Swalwell
posted: “This is the beginning of the end.”
Tonight the House passed the Senate’s continuing resolution to fund the government, ending the longest government shutdown in U.S. history: 43 days. The vote was 222–209, with all but two Republicans voting in favor and all but six Democrats voting against it, saying they would not support a continuing resolution that did not extend the premium tax credits for healthcare insurance purchased on the Affordable Care Act markets.
Republicans neglected to extend those credits in their budget reconciliation
bill of July—the one they call the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”—and without
them, millions of Americans will be unable to afford healthcare coverage, and
premiums will skyrocket for millions more.
The measure funds the government through January 30,
2026; overturns the layoffs of federal employees administration officials made
during the shutdown and guarantees workers’ pay; and appropriates money to pay
for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits through September
2026, taking them out of Trump’s hands as a pressure point in January.
Failing to get an extension of the healthcare premium tax credits into the continuing resolution, House Democrats filed a discharge petition to force the House to vote on a measure that would extend the credits for three years. “There are only two ways this fight will end,” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) told his colleagues. “Either Republicans finally decide to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits this year, or the American people will throw Republicans out of their jobs next year and end the speakership of Donald J. Trump once and for all.”
—Heather Cox Richardson

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.