Private equity funds own approximately 9%
of all private hospitals and 30% of all proprietary for-profit hospitals,
including 34% that serve rural populations. They’ve also bought up nursing
homes and doctors’ practices and are investing more year by year.
The net impact? Medical costs to the
government and to patients have gone up while patients have suffered more
adverse medical results, according to two current studies.
The Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) recently published a
paper which found: Private equity acquisition was associated with increased
hospital-acquired adverse events, including falls and central line–associated
bloodstream infections, along with a larger but less statistically precise
increase in surgical site infections.
This should not come as a surprise.
Private equity firms in general operate as follows: They raise funds from
investors to purchase enterprises using as much borrowed money as possible.
That debt does not fall on the private equity firm or its investors, however.
Instead, all of it is placed on the books of the purchased entity.
If a private equity firm borrows money
and buys up a nursing home or hospital chain, the debt goes on the books of
these healthcare facilities in what is called a leveraged buyout.
To service the debt, the enterprise’s
management, directed by their private equity ownership, must reduce costs, and
increase its cash flow. The first and easiest way to reduce costs is by
reducing the number of staff and by decreasing services. Of course, the quality
of care then suffers. Meanwhile, the private equity firm charges the company
fees in order to secure its own profits. With so much taxpayer money sloshing
around in the system, hedge funds also are cashing in.
An even larger study of private equity and health was
completed this summer and published in the British Medical
Journal (BMJ). After reviewing 1,778 studies it concluded that after
private equity firms purchased healthcare facilities, health outcomes
deteriorated, costs to patients or payers increased, and overall quality
declined.
One former executive at a private
equity firm that owns an assisted-living facility near Boulder, Colorado, candidly described why
the firm was refusing to hire and retain high-quality caregivers: “Their
position was: We are trying to increase our profitability. Care is an ancillary
part of the conversation.”
Medicare Advantage Creates Wall Street
Advantages
Congress passed the Medicare Advantage
program in 2003. Its proponents claimed it would encourage competition and
greater efficiency in the provision of health insurance for seniors. At the
time, privatization was all the rage as the Democratic and Republican parties
competed to please Wall Street donors.
It was argued that Medicare, which was
actually much more efficient than
private insurance companies, needed the iron fist of profit-making to improve
its services. These new private plans were permitted to compete with Medicare
Part C (Medigap) supplemental insurance.
In 2007, 19% of Medicare recipients
enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans. By 2023 enrollment had risen to 51%. These
heavily marketed plans are attractive because many don’t charge additional
monthly premiums, and they often include dental, vision, and hearing coverage,
which Medicare does not. And in some plans, other perks get thrown in, like gym
memberships and preloaded over-the-counter debit cards for use in pharmacies
for health items.
How is it possible for Medical
Advantage to do all this and still make a profit?
According to a report by the Physicians for a
National Health Program, it’s very simple—they overcharge the
government, that is we, the taxpayers, “by a minimum of $88 billion per year.”
The report says it could be as much as $140 billion.
In addition to inflating their bills
to the government, these HMO plans don’t pay doctors outside of their networks,
deny or slow needed coverage to patients, and delay legitimate payments. As Dr.
Kenneth Williams, CEO of Alliance HealthCare, said of Medicare
Advantage plans, “They don’t want to reimburse for anything — deny, deny, deny.
They are taking over Medicare and they are taking advantage of elderly
patients.”
Enter Hedge Funds
With so much taxpayer money sloshing
around in the system, hedge funds also are cashing in. They have bought large
quantities of stock in the healthcare companies that are milking the government
through their Medicare Advantage programs.
They then insist that these healthcare
companies initiate stock buybacks, inflating the price of their stock and the
financial return to the hedge funds. Stock buybacks are a simple way to
transfer corporate money to the largest stock-sellers.
(A stock buyback is when a corporation
repurchases its own stock. The stock price invariably goes up because the
company’s earnings are spread over a smaller number of shares. Until they were
deregulated in 1982, stock buybacks were essentially outlawed because they were
considered a form of stock price manipulation.)
United Healthcare, for example, is the
largest player in the Medicare Advantage market, accounting for 29% of all
enrollments in 2023. It also has handsomely rewarded its hedge fund
stock-sellers to the tune of $45 billion in stock
buybacks since 2007, with a third of that coming since March 2020. Cigna,
another big Medicare Advantage player, just announced a $10 billion stock buyback.
These repurchases are also extremely
lucrative for United Healthcare’s top executives, who receive most of their
compensation through stock incentives. CEO Andrew Witty, for example, hauled
in $20.9 million in 2022 compensation,
of which $16.4 million came from stock and stock option awards.
Those of us fighting for Medicare for
All have much in common with every worker who is losing his or her job as a
result of leveraged buyouts and stock buybacks.
A look at the pharmaceutical industry
shows where all this is heading. Between 2012 and 2021, fourteen of the largest
publicly traded pharmaceutical companies spent $747 billion on stock buybacks
and dividends, more than the $660 billion they spent on research and
development, according to a report by economists
William Lazonick and Öner Tulum. Little wonder that drug prices are
astronomically high in the U.S.
And so, the gravy train is loaded and
rolling, delivering our tax dollars via Medicare Advantage reimbursements to
companies like United Healthcare and Big Pharma, which pass it on to Wall
Street private equity firms and hedge funds.
It’s Not Just Healthcare
In researching my book, Wall
Street’s War on Workers, we found that private equity firms and
hedge funds are undermining the working class through leveraged buyouts and
stock buybacks. When private equity moves in, mass layoffs (just like
healthcare staff cuts and shortages) almost always follow so that the companies
can service their debt and private equity can extract profits.
When hedge funds insist on stock
repurchases, mass layoffs are used to free up cash in order to buy back their
shares. As a result, between 1996 and today, we estimate that more than
30 million workers have gone through mass layoffs.
Meanwhile, stock buybacks have
metastasized throughout the economy. In 1982, before deregulation, only about
2% of all corporate profits went to stock buybacks. Today, it is nearly 70%.
Those of us fighting for Medicare for
All, therefore, have much in common with every worker who is losing his or her
job as a result of leveraged buyouts and stock buybacks. Every fight to stop a
mass layoff is a fight against the same Wall Street forces that are attacking
Medicare and trying to privatize it.
Creating a sane healthcare system,
therefore, will depend on building a massive common movement to free our
economy from Wall Street’s wealth extraction. To take the wind out of Medicare
Advantage and Wall Street’s rapacious sail through our healthcare system, we
don’t need more studies. It’s time to outlaw leveraged buyouts and stock
buybacks.
[Les Leopold is the
executive director of the Labor Institute and author of the
forthcoming book “Wall Street’s War on Worker s: How Mass Layoffs and Greed
Are Destroying the Working Class and What to Do About It.” Read more
of his work on his substack here.]
Licensed under Creative Commons (CC
BY-NC-ND 3.0).
Source URL: https://portside.org/2024-01-04/we-deserve-medicare-all-what-we-get-medicare-wall-street
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.