Saturday, February 25, 2023

Hum If You Can't Sing (a Book of Poems) by Glen Brown

 



“In poems that are often meditative, humorous, philosophical, speculative, Glen Brown’s Hum If You Can’t Sing revisits all sorts of narratives—mythic allegories, fairy tales, news stories that boggle the mind, family histories—all in the service of blurring the edges between what is strange and surreal and what is domestically habitual. Here are poems that show us Snow White as a harassed housewife, or Sleeping Beauty surrounded by modern day condos and a Prince who is existentially troubled by his circumstance. But here are poems as well that acknowledge how our diurnal lives can be fraught with tempestuous and epical emotions, how family migrations can have a legendary cast to them, how boys playing stickball on city streets may remind us of more Olympian competitions. In this fine melding of the extraordinary with an everydayness, the improbable with the commonplace, the poems show us how our lives can seem more expansive and astonishing, how they might attain, finally, a level of wonder.”  

—Gregory Djanikian      

“Hum If You Can't Sing is so verbally playful and so invitingly aware of its clear occasions for poetry that it reminds us of how a delight in language so often rhymes with a delight in life. And as the title suggests, all of us, no matter what our aptitude for singing, can join in Glen Brown's delightful chorus.” 

—Michael Collier     

“Through his playful wit and deft use of language and line breaks, Glen Brown’s exquisite collection of poetry breathes new life into some familiar tales. With a poetic sleight of hand his work offers a singular insight into human nature and into the beautiful nature of language itself.”  

—Jen Christensen

It's available on Amazon: ISBN: 978-1-7372855-9-5 (paperback)

https://www.amazon.com/Hum-If-You-Cant-Sing-ebook/dp/B0BWPHHSNQ/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3W0S87ENDECOU&keywords=hum+if+you+can%27t+sing+by+glen+brown&qid=1677338555&sprefix=%2Caps%2C93&sr=8-1

It's also available at Barnes & Noble: ISBN: 978-1-7372855-8-8 (hardcover)

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hum-if-you-cant-sing-glen-brown/1143131918?ean=9781737285588&fbclid=IwAR3q455crK0yTn7CTBMqGiZms08OcS-YFMxFYiRI2l3uvFN6AadxyEi7zMo

Amazon Reviews:

A Joy to Read:

Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2024

Glen Brown’s humbling collection of personal poems, Hum If You Cannot Sing, is a joy to contemplate, again and again. His verses are a fun and flawless reminder of the riotous carnival of our lives: past and present. Bizarre historical oddities are often summoned in a surreal séance of the bygone and notorious quite off the spectrum(?) of human behaviors; not to mention, the life of a Chicago child growing and erupting into corporeal and mindful enlightenment; and constantly fresh reminders of who and what we all are in this parade of emotional souls. If you seek you’ll find yourself and all the others of us in this fun, dreamlike and image-perfect sideshow in a magical collection of verse. Enjoy! -John Dillon

Must-Read Poetry Collection:

Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2024

We should all take Glen Brown's advice and "hum if we can't sing" while breaking into song and dance "at every conflict in life." Wouldn't the world be a better place? This eclectic mix of poetry hooked me from the first page and took me through an amazing journey where Brown showcases his mastery and love of poetry. Metaphorical fairy and folk tales, hilarious interpretations of popular news stories of the weird, reflections of family, profound social commentary, memories of growing up in and around Chicago in the 1950's and 1960's are all included. I have read the book three times now, and I'll be sure to go back to it many more times in the future. -DJM

Full of insight and beauty

Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2023

I don't know how many people buy books of poetry. I sure didn't for a long time. I was under the impression that poetry was a complex undertaking, full of strict rhyme schemes, esoteric culture and impenetrable philosophy. Turns out I was wrong- poetry can be the very opposite of all that. It can be simple, delightful, accessible and understandable. In Hum If You Can't Sing, Glen Brown shares with us a collection of poetry that is inviting and enjoyable but still rich with insight and clever turns of phrase.

The stories told here are both universal and deeply personal. They are full of fairytale heroes and modern scenes, with stories either large enough to fill a newspaper front page or otherwise small enough to fit into a quiet afternoon. Glen is a master of juxtaposition, creating the new from the familiar, mixing joy with sadness, frustration with humor, in equal measure. So read it, without reservation. There are no rules to the dance. Read if you can't write. Hum if you can't sing. -Nick Vovos

Delightful

Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2023

I'm a retired high school English teacher and know of Glen through his pension writings. Intrigued by those, I purchased HUM IF YOU CAN'T SING. This will be a simplistic review because I can summarize in a few words: These poems are my life. Section III reminds me of my childhood - Royal Blue where we bought our penny candy, neighborhood baseball games, my pet squirrels, our unlocked house, my name. I, too, have an obsession for chocolate; I stash it in the garage refrigerator and hide it in my drawer. I enjoyed the connections to politicians, film, fashion, literature and toys in section I. I know all too well the questions, the pain, and the deaths that surround surgery.

"Without Pomp and Circumstance" echoes my exact feelings. But I have to admit my favorite is "Keeping a Net beneath Them." I taught composition and honors classes, but I also taught special ed/remedial classes. There was nothing I liked more than seeing the "I get it" look cross a student's face. That is what I miss most about teaching. I know this is a collection I will read many times as it is as personal to me as it is to Glen, and I thank him for that. -Robin Cederblad

A powerful collection of poems . . .

Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2023

This collection of poems by Glen Brown is powerful. Brown took me through a life's joys and sorrows, with grace, skill, and irony. I like his style, casual and elegant at the same time. I flew from one poem to the next, unable to put down this book . . . and in an hour, Glen Brown had taken me on a wonderful journey. Each poem is a beautiful surprise. This is one of the best books of poems I've read in a long time. I recommend it to anyone with imagination and an open heart. -Bob Borta

A compelling collection of vivid, insightful, and personal poetry

Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2023

I've read many individual poems, but not many poetry collections. I read this one in a single sitting, which I rarely do with any book nowadays.

The imagery is vivid, well-crafted, and compelling. I found myself experiencing many glimpses of life moments both real and imagined. A childhood baseball game; a soldier in the jungle; couples engaged in heated arguments or conjugal bliss; a tragic death; a child playing in the snow. The broad range of people and experiences covered within and among these poems offers an insightful glimpse into the human condition. The tone ranges from serious to humorous, heartwarming to despairing, always with an eye to the humanity of the people and the poignant power of the experience.

This book also demonstrates the merits of a poetry collection. Taken individually, most of these poems would serve as excellent reads in their own right. However, including them in a shared collection creates space for the emergence of recurring themes and arcs that would be lacking when the poems are read individually. On a good day, a poetry collection is to poems what an album is to songs -- and this poetry collection is having a good day.

I definitely recommend this collection for anyone who enjoys reading and is currently experiencing the human condition. Whether or not you relate to the specific memories and experiences described therein, you will find poems and verses that speak to you. -Treesong (Justin O’Neill)

A masterful poet.

Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2023

Glen Brown's poems are a revelation. They are keen observations on the human condition. He writes of families and philosophy, unusual answers to surprising questions, Barbie dolls and baseball bats. There's just a lot packed into 100 pages. -Fred Klonsky

Witty, Personal and Thoughtful

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2023

This was written by my most influential teacher from High School. This was my initial reason to purchase the book. I am so glad I did; it is full of insightful and inspiring words. I highly recommend this book. -Karen Rice-Heidewald

Beautiful:

Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2023

Glen Brown has written a beautiful collection of poems that are approachable, emotive, nostalgic and universal. His stories resonate with my own life experiences, and I felt for the narrator in several. Thank you Glen for sharing this gift with the world.-Mike Magluilo

Variety of Poems, All Well Written!

Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2023

Whether you are an avid poetry reader, only occasional, or anywhere in between, Hum If You Can’t Sing was written for you. Some of the poems are playful, others much more serious, and all came to life as they brought me to another time or place. A wonderful book to pick up time and time again. -Bekah

Poetry that speaks to the human condition in an intellectually and emotionally playful manner

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 17, 2023

Hum If You Can't Sing, is a great collection of poetry from a long-time friend, and former teacher, of mine. Since I purchased this book, it has not left my desk. I like to open it to a random page and to see what Glen has to say to me on that occasion. His sense of humor and social justice, as well as his awareness of history are played off against the sometimes-arbitrary nature of human existence. No matter where I turn in this treasure it gives me something I value. Hum let's me check in with my friend whenever I need it. -Al Rago

 Writing that touches you in body, heart and soul

Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2023

From the title poem, through the landscape of Chicago through the years , to the metaphors of fairy tales, to his personal experiences, Glen Brown takes one on an inner journey with his poignant and beautiful poems. Glen covers so many ages and places and relationships throughout his book that there is something there to touch everyone. Growing up in Chicago, I had a deep appreciation for the references that touched my young adulthood there, but you don’t need to know them to connect with these poems. Yet, “Hum If You Can’t Sing” and “Birth of an Angel” are the most gorgeous among these. I can see myself dancing through “Hum,” and laying in the snow flapping my arms in “Birth of an Angel,” giving one body sensations of the words. This is when poetry touches me most deeply. Don’t miss this remarkable book of poems! -Jann, Signal Mtn. Tennessee

Pitch Perfect

Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2023

Just as the title suggests, "Hum if You Can’t Sing" unconditionally invites the reader into poetry with no expectations or prerequisites. Glen Brown is a masterful wordsmith in this eclectic and engaging collection of work. He challenges societal constructs and teases conventional wisdom, captivating our curiosity and encouraging us to use our own voice, however out of tune. -Johnny Alletto

 Superb Book of Poetry

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 15, 2023

“Prose – words in their best order; poetry – the best words in their best order.”
--Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1827

The poetry of Glen Brown brings us the 2023 examples of this definition in his latest collection, Hum If You Can't Sing. The scope of his poetry ranges from well-articulated silliness to philosophical insights, all the while respecting a reader's intelligence. He never talks down to a reader; he never drowns a reader in obscurity. He chooses to be like the porridge that Goldilocks eats – just right. He writes of playing in the streets as a child, to revisiting Rapunzel, and of coming to terms with our ultimate end. Yes, simply read, alertly reread, and thoroughly savor his poetry. You will be amply rewarded for your journey. - Ken and Mary Lou Previti

Powerful and Thought provoking

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 9, 2023

Powerful, sensitive, thought-provoking, delightful! Creativity at its best! HUM IF YOU CAN’T SING is a keeper! Thank you, Glen Brown! -Sharon Jakubka.

On Messenger:

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 9, 2023

Got your book today. Preparing for an afternoon read. Thank You. I like the way you use “history” to set up your voice to follow. I’m a bitch with content. So I’m gonna disengage and enter with a clean slate to see where you take me… March 22: Been reading your work a coupla times… enjoy the plain story voice and the “headline setups” for the poems to follow… March 29: Glen/Poet: Clean lines that take us somewhere/ a triad of voices that blend into one. An enjoyable read of your history and those you admire or analyze. It’d be fun to do a duel reading… -Terry Jacobus

Plagiarize this book:

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on January 11, 2024

You’ll sound witty to your friends and maybe win over the target of your affection. You’ll laugh reading these poems if you are the type. You’ll cry if you’re more that type. While many writers aspire to have a way with words, Brown has his way with them. He threads together relatable fibers of everyday life into a tapestry commemorative of the human experience. Remarkable work. -Jeff Price

 

 

Thursday, February 23, 2023

The EuroMaidan Revolution (Kyiv Independent)

 


EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is an account of the 2014 uprising in Ukraine against the Putin/Kremlin-backed government of President Viktor Yanukovych from a Ukrainian perspective.

There are many other facts to be taken into account when considering what brought about the Revolution of Dignity, also known as the EuroMaidan Revolution.

US critics allege that the US backed the revolution. That is probably an overstatement. It would be safer and more accurate to say there is credible evidence that the US encouraged the uprising.

Conversely, it is clear from his very public statements at the time that Vladimir Putin was demanding Yanukovych take more decisive action and use greater force to subdue the protesters and maintain his grip on power.

What clearly comes across in this piece is the very personal significance self-determination had to the Ukrainians who were giving their lives for independence and obviously still are today.

Ukrainian self-determination is by no means a new concept. It is arguably a centuries-old work in progress. One that Russia has historically opposed, often through the use of force. — MA/RSN)."

The EuroMaidan Revolution is often credited with being the single most consequential event in Ukraine's modern history. After pro-Kremlin President Viktor Yanukovych took power in 2010, the political and business landscape in Ukraine was gradually deteriorating.

In November 2013, Yanukovych refused to sign the long-awaited Association Agreement with the European Union, shortly thereafter receiving a loan from the Kremlin. His refusal to sign the agreement sparked protests all over the country, with the largest demonstration taking place in Kyiv on Independence Square, known in Ukrainian as Maidan Nezalezhnosti.

The protests would turn into a revolution that lasted until February 2014, ending with Yanukovych fleeing to Russia. More than 100 people, who are now known as the Heavenly Hundred, were murdered while standing up to tyranny. By ousting the pro-Kremlin regime, Ukrainians chose their own future with freedom of speech, rule of law, and democratic values.

What triggered the initial protests?

On Nov. 21, 2013, the government of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, controlled by Yanukovych, suspended the preparations for the signing of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. This halted Ukraine’s pro-European trajectory in favor of pursuing closer ties with Russia and the Eurasian Customs Union, an economic-political union led by Russia.

Outraged by this decision, hundreds of people gathered on Independence Square that evening for a peaceful protest.

In the following days, the number of demonstrators on Maidan swelled to hundreds of thousands of people. Similar protests emerged in other Ukrainian cities including Lviv, Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Donetsk. Many of the protesters were young people, including students, some of which started a strike and refused to attend classes.

How did it turn into a full-blown revolution?

At around 4 a.m. on Nov. 30, when a couple of hundred people (mostly students) stayed for the night on Maidan, the Ukrainian riot police, Berkut, encircled the protesters. Using excessive violence, Berkut forced the people out of the square, beating them up with batons and kicking those who fell down. Some of the fleeing protesters sheltered at the nearby Mykhailivsky Cathedral.

On the morning of Nov. 30, Ukrainians woke up to shocking footage of the brutal beating. They didn’t wait long to react. That same day thousands took the streets to protest, demanding punishment for those responsible for the overnight attack.

On Dec. 1, the protesters moved back into and started setting up a camp on Independence Square and occupying government buildings in Kyiv. All of the police’s attempts to clear the streets ended up causing even a bigger backlash, bringing more and more people to join the uprising.

On Dec. 8, "A Million’s March" took place in central Kyiv with around 1 million people demanding the resignation of Azarov’s government. Protests continued all across Ukraine.

What were the revolution's demands?

The EuroMaidan initially began with people protesting the disruption of Ukraine’s European integration. But as the authorities used force to repress peaceful demonstrations, people’s demands changed.

Ukrainians opposed the widespread corruption, police violence, and abuse of power by Yanukovych and his allies, eventually demanding his resignation.

How did the revolution result in the murder of more than 100 protestors? From the start, the pro-Kremlin government and riot police thought they could crush the protest by force. It didn’t work, in turn, it caused more people to protest.

On Jan. 16, the government adopted a package of anti-democratic laws, restricting freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Known as the “dictatorship laws,” they aimed to criminalize the opposition and civil society. The adoption of these laws had the opposite effect.

The number of people outraged by the government’s actions increased, while the riot police turned excessively violent.

The next day, several public organizations announced a full mobilization on Independence Square. More and more people camped in the square. They called for "massive and immediate resistance" to the “criminals in power.”

On Jan. 19, the riot police and other forces tried to push protesters out of the camp, shooting firearms at them. The protesters built barricades, used Molotov cocktails, famously burned tires, and threw paving stones at law enforcement.

On Jan. 22, a sniper killed the first two protesters, Serhiy Nigoyan and Mykhailo Zhyznevskyi, the first of the Heavenly Hundred. Two more protesters were injured that day, eventually dying in the hospital.

On Feb. 18-20 violence in Kyiv escalated dramatically, with law enforcement firing at crowds of unarmed protesters, killing nearly a hundred of them.

A turning point came when on Feb. 20, the parliament, including lawmakers from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, voted to condemn violence against the demonstrators. The next day, protesters demanded Yanukovych’s resignation. Yanukovych soon fled Ukraine. His 140-hectare luxurious residence called Mezhyhirya just outside Kyiv was opened to the public.

On Feb. 22, the parliament removed Yanukovych from office. By then, Yanukovych’s pro-Kremlin government had collapsed.

What is the legacy of the revolution?

The EuroMaidan Revolution was a defining moment in the history of modern Ukraine, a time when the Ukrainian people made a clear conscious decision that they want their country to grow into a full-fledged democracy and become a member of the EU.

In the following years, Ukraine signed an association agreement with the EU and received a visa-free regime with the bloc. In 2022, during Russia's all-out war, in a historic turn, the EU granted Ukraine candidate status.

The uprising also laid the foundation for the development of a strong civil society in Ukraine and ignited a cultural renaissance, as Ukrainians started to explore their history and identity more deeply.

Meanwhile, after losing influence over the Ukrainian government in 2014, Moscow launched a war against Ukraine in an attempt to pull Kyiv back into its orbit.

Russia occupied Crimea in March 2014. It soon launched an attack on Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region, occupying parts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. In February 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, bombing cities all across the country.

-Reader Supported News    

(Photo by Sergei Supinsky/AFP, Maidan Square in Kyiv, February 2014)



"The destruction is a deliberate attempt to obliterate Ukrainian history and culture" (Smithsonian Magazine)

 


When we think about war, what comes to mind is that quest for power and territory, the violent use of destructive armaments and the horrific costs incurred in human lives lost and shattered. Russia’s war in Ukraine is particularly cruel in attacking civilian targets, and it’s also marked by a strong cultural element—one that is being met with resistance from not only Ukrainians, but also the international community and the Smithsonian Institution.

Russian leader Vladimir Putin has wrongly made culture both a justification and an object of war with Ukraine. As in other regions of Europe, the population of the geographic region of modern Ukraine reflects a diversity of ethnic migrations and cultural influences, as well as a succession of political rulers and changing boundaries over millennia.

Putin, though, claims that Ukrainians lack the history, culture and identity worthy of a national state separate from Russia. While drawing on periods of the czarist Russian Empire and the Soviet era to make his case, Putin denies crucial cultural realities.

The Ukrainian language, the country’s art and its history—including the Slavic-Christian state centered in Kyiv a thousand years ago, the 19th-century flowering of Ukrainian culture and nationalism, the post-World War I Ukrainian republic, the Ukrainian independence movement of the early 1990s and its reaffirming Orange Revolution in 2004 and the Euromaidan Revolution in 2013-2014—all represent an undeniable Ukrainian identity that is centuries in the making. 

Despite this, in 2014 Putin pursued his territorial ambitions by supporting ethnic Russian separatists in the Donbas region and forcibly taking Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.

As the one-year anniversary of the deadly 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine approaches, we take a close look at the ongoing work of hundreds of professionals across a landscape of Ukrainian and international organizations to defend endangered cultural heritage.

Crucial investigations are underway that will one day provide an accounting of Russia’s devastating war crimes. These attacks are not just random, nor do they represent collateral damage. Rather, they suggest a targeted attack on Ukrainian history, culture and identity, a means toward Putin’s ends—the destruction is a deliberate attempt to obliterate Ukrainian history and culture.

To support Putin’s wrongful argument that Ukraine doesn’t have a culture and history independent of Russia, his forces figure they can simply bomb away the country’s cultural heritage.

To date, almost 1,600 cases of potential damage to Ukrainian cultural heritage sites have been documented, including some 700 monuments and memorials, and more than 200 museums, archives and libraries. Notably, more than 500 are religious sites—places of worship and cemeteries—with those of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church specifically targeted. 

The greatest number of cases are associated with regions of the most aggressive Russian attacks: Kyiv, Kharkiv, Mariupol and Luhansk. And the work of organizations, including the Smithsonian, mobilized thanks to years of cultural heritage training efforts, is aiding the country in its effort to protect artifacts, books, documents and artworks from these insidious attacks…


For the entire article, click: Dr. Richard Kurin

Dr. Richard Kurin, the Smithsonian’s Distinguished Scholar and Ambassador at Large, has served as the institution's Under Secretary and as director of the Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage, among other leadership roles over his four decade-long Smithsonian career. He founded the Smithsonian Cultural Rescue Initiative. 



Wednesday, February 22, 2023

How Dominion Voting Systems filing proves Fox News was "deliberately lying" by Charles Kaiser

 


The Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe said Dominion Voting Systems’ brief requesting summary judgment against Fox News for defamation – and $1.6bn – is “likely to succeed and likely to be a landmark” in the history of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

“I have never seen a defamation case with such overwhelming proof that the defendant admitted in writing that it was making up fake information in order to increase its viewership and its revenues,” Tribe told the Guardian. “Fox and its producers and performers were lying as part of their business model.”

The case concerns Fox News’s repetition of Donald Trump’s lie that his 2020 defeat by Joe Biden was the result of electoral fraud, including claims about Dominion voting machines.

Tribe said the filing “establishes that Fox was not only reckless” but also that producers, owners and personalities were “deliberately lying and knew they were lying about the nature of Dominion’s machines and the supposed way they could be manipulated”.

Filed last week, the 192-page document makes it clear that senior figures at Fox News from Rupert Murdoch down knew immediately after the election that claims of voter fraud, in particular those aimed at Dominion, were false.

 

Tucker Carlson called the charges “ludicrous” and “off the rails”. Sean Hannity texted about “F’ing lunatics”. A senior network vice-president called one of the stories “MIND BLOWINGLY NUTS”.

But none of this knowledge prevented hosts from repeating lies about everything from imaginary algorithms shaving votes from Dominion machines to non-existent ties between the company and Venezuela.

Tribe was one of several first amendment experts to call the filing nearly unprecedented. “This is the most remarkable discovery filing I’ve ever read in a commercial litigation,” said Scott Horton, a Columbia Law School lecturer, Harper’s Magazine contributing editor and litigator with clients including CBS and the Associated Press.

“A summary judgment motion by a plaintiff in this kind of case is almost unheard of. These suits usually fail because you can’t prove the company you’re suing knew they were spreading falsehoods. That you would have evidence they knew it was a lie is almost unheard of … in this case the sheer volume of all the email and text messages is staggering.”

Horton said Dominion’s case gets “huge benefit” from the way Fox employees “express themselves with a huge measure of hyperbole about absolutely everything”.

Tribe agreed: “This is one of the first defamation cases in which it is possible to rule for the plaintiff on summary judgment. This is not a request to go to trial. There is no genuinely disputed fact. The defendants were deliberately lying in a manner that was per se libelous and they clearly knew it.”

When the Dominion filing was first reported, Fox News said it “mischaracterized the record, cherry-picked quotes stripped of key context and spilled considerable ink on facts that are irrelevant under black-letter principles of defamation law”.

 


Lawyers for Fox News claim everything their anchors said was protected by the first amendment.

Other lawyers are skeptical. “You may have a first amendment right to report on what the president said but you have no right to validate a statement that you know to be false,” said Steven Shapiro, former legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union and counsel or co-counsel on more than 200 supreme court briefs.

David Korzenik is a leading libel lawyer whose clients include the Guardian. He said the Dominion case shows it “possible to prove actual malice. If particular people are shown to have believed something to be false, or to have been highly aware of its probable falsehood, and at the same time they made statements endorsing it on air, they are in play.

“You’re allowed to be biased … you’re allowed to try to make money. And people should be able to disagree with each other in a newsroom. But if Fox anchors say they don’t believe X and then turn around and endorse X on air after expressing manifest disbelief in it, they have a real problem.

“The actual malice standard is very high and it’s supposed to be … it’s a burden that can be overcome in limited but appropriate circumstances.”

The biggest irony revealed by the Dominion filing is that Carlson and colleagues quickly decided the greatest threat to their network was one of the only times it reported an accurate scoop: that Arizona had gone for Biden, at 11.20pm on election night.

Four days later, another Murdoch property, the New York Post, asked Trump to stop the stolen election claim. Rupert Murdoch thanked the Fox News chief executive, Suzanne Scott, for making sure the editorial got wide distribution, according to the Dominion filing.

But later that day, as Fox executives realized they were losing viewers, the tide began to shift. “Getting creamed by CNN!” Murdoch messaged Scott.

In a message to his producer, Carlson sounded terrified: “Do the executives understand how much credibility and trust we’ve lost with our audience? We’re playing with fire, for real an alternative like Newsmax could be devastating to us.”

And so on 8 November Maria Bartiromo featured the Trump adviser Sidney Powell and said: “I know that there were voting irregularities. Tell me about that.”

That alternate reality would be repeated for months.

Perhaps most devastating of all is Dominion’s account of what happened on 12 November, after the Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich tweeted a fact-check that challenged a false Trump attack on “Dominion voting systems”, which Heinrich said had been reported by Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs. Heinrich pointed out that top election infrastructure officials said “there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised”.

Carlson was incensed. He messaged Hannity: “Please get her fired. Seriously what the fuck? Actually shocked. It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It’s measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down.”

Hannity complained to Scott, who said Heinrich had “serious nerve doing this and if this gets picked up, viewers are going to be further disgusted”.

Heinrich was told her tweet violated company policy because it mentioned colleagues. By the next morning, she had deleted the tweet. She replaced it with a new one disputing Trump’s false charge against Dominion. The new tweet omitted the fact Hannity and Dobbs reported Trump’s attack.

-Charles Kaiser, The Guardian

·       This story was amended on 21 February 2023, to reflect the fact that after Jacqui Heinrich complied with an order to delete her tweet fact-checking Trump’s false charge against Dominion, because it mentioned Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs, she posted a second tweet on the matter.

 


Tuesday, February 21, 2023

Nationwide Federal Order Bars Starbucks From Firing Workers for Union Activity

 


A federal judge issued a nationwide order late Friday barring Starbucks from firing union organizers—a ruling that affirmed a long-established law which workers say the coffee chain has violated hundreds of times since unionizing efforts were first launched in Buffalo, New York in 2021.

U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith ruled in Michigan that former shift supervisor Hannah Whitbeck must be reinstated in her position, which she was fired from in April 2022.

Whitbeck and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Detroit Regional Director Elizabeth Kerwin argued that the former worker had been fired because of her involvement in union organizing at the store where she worked in Ann Arbor—one of 366 Starbucks stores across the U.S. where employees have organized to create bargaining units. Nearly 300 stores have won union elections so far.

Starbucks Workers United, the employees' union, has accused the company of firing more than 200 employees in illegal retaliation for organizing.

The company claimed Whitbeck was fired for leaving 20 to 30 minutes early a single time without finding someone to fill in for her, but Kerwin argued that would have been a violation of Starbucks' own policy of issuing a warning for such an incident. Kerwin also noted that Starbucks was aware Whitbeck was involved in unionization efforts.

Jennifer Abruzzo, general counsel for the NLRB, said the nationwide order was significant.

"The district court's ruling confirms that Starbucks continues to violate the law in egregious ways, thus requiring a nationwide cease and desist order," Abruzzo toldBloomberg.

The NLRB has issued 75 complaints against Starbucks for unfair labor practices, including intimidating and retaliating against workers who are organizing.

"Firing workers for organizing is already illegal, of course," said Starbucks Workers United, the employees' union, of Goldsmith's order. "But this decision is HUGE for getting speedy justice for those retaliated against."

Goldsmith ordered Starbucks to post physical copies of the order at the Ann Arbor store and to read it at a mandatory meeting. The company was given 21 days to file an affidavit declaring it had complied.

Starbucks reported a 31% annual growth in profits in 2021, the year workers began unionizing, as well as $8.1 billion just in the fourth quarter of that year. Still, the company has aggressively fought union efforts by holding captive-audience meetings with CEO Howard Schultz and threatening the rights of workers who organize. This past week, Starbucks refused to send Schultz to testify before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on the company's conduct.

Goldsmith's ruling showed that the company "can't just fire" its way out of listening to workers, said economic justice group Fight for $15.

"Love to see the NLRB push back against Starbucks' intimidation tactics," said the group. "Unionizing is a right!" 

-Julia Conley, Common Dreams