After months of Putin building up tens of thousands of troops
near the Ukrainian border and a series of failed diplomatic talks, Russia is
now waging a full-out war on Ukraine.
Tensions escalated quickly when, on February 21, Putin delivered
an hour-long combative speech that essentially denied Ukrainian statehood.
He recognized the independence of two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine
where Moscow has backed a separatist rebellion since 2014 and sent so-called
peacekeeping forces into the region. As experts said, that was likely just the
beginning, setting the stage for a much larger conflict.
Days later, that larger conflict materialized. On February 24,
Putin announced he was launching an assault “to defend people who for eight
years are suffering persecution and genocide by the Kyiv regime,” a reference
to a false claim about the government in Ukraine. He demanded Ukraine lay down
its weapons or be “responsible for bloodshed.”
Soon after Putin’s speech, reports emerged of
explosions around cities, including Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine and the capital Kyiv.
The Ukrainian foreign minister called it “a full-scale invasion of
Ukraine.” By the afternoon in Ukraine, Russian troops and tanks had entered the
country on three fronts: from Belarus in the north,
from the east of Ukraine, and from the south.
The Russian military has targeted critical infrastructure, like airports, with airstrikes and has launched more than 400 missiles, as of March 1. But as a senior US defense official said on February 26, “There’s no doubt in our mind that civilian infrastructure and civilian areas are being hit as a result of these barrages.”
Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, and Kyiv, the capital, are among the main battlefronts. “They had maximal war aims,” Michael Kofman, research director in the Russia studies program at CNA, said in an interview posted on Twitter on February 25. “They had a military operation that’s now in progress, first to try to achieve regime change, encircle the capital, and try to overthrow the Ukrainian government, and then a much larger set of pincer movements to encircle and envelope Ukrainian forces. Try to do this quickly and force surrender of isolated pockets.”
The Russian army, however, has not been able to completely roll over Ukrainian forces, and some analysts have suggested Moscow may have been surprised at the resistance. Samuel Charap, a senior political scientist at RAND Corporation, told a panel of reporters on February 28 that Russia’s military performance has been odd. “In other words, some of the things that I would have expected — like the Air Force taking a major role — have not happened.”
“Seems to me there was a lot of war optimism and a sense that the [Ukrainian] government would fall with just a little push,” Charap continued. “And that didn’t happen. I wouldn’t read too much into that about the ultimate course of the war, though. This is still a situation where the deck unfortunately is stacked against the Ukrainians, despite their bravery.”
Putin himself has called on the Ukrainian army to “take power into their own hands and overthrow” Zelensky, a sign that Putin remains focused on regime change. “According to the available intelligence, the enemy marked me as a target No. 1 and my family as the target No. 2,” said Zelensky, speaking on the night of February 24.
Russia had gone back and forth as to whether they are willing to negotiate, but on February 28, high-level officials from Russia and Ukraine met at the Ukraine-Belarus border. Russia has continued to insist that a ceasefire requires “demilitarization” and neutrality for Ukraine, but Ukraine has only continued to push for more military aid and ascension into Western bodies like the EU, even signing an EU membership application amid the fighting.
Both Ukraine and Russia have suggested they will hold another round of talks in coming days. Across conflicts, there is usually a severe escalation in fighting before ceasefires, as everyone attempts to maximize their leverage. “I think that they want to inflict maximum damage to pressure the Ukrainian government to seek some sort of ceasefire that is effectively a surrender,” said Margarita Konaev, associate director of analysis and research fellow at Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
More than 2,000
Ukrainian civilians have been killed, Ukraine’s emergency services said March 2.
Ukrainian officials have said some 5,300 Russian
troops have been killed in the fighting as of March 1, but
American and European officials put that
number closer to 2,000. Experts said all these statistics should be
treated with much caution because of the fog of war and the incentives both
Russia and Ukraine have to push a particular narrative.
Ukrainian officials have also accused Russia of
war crimes after reports of a shelling of
an orphanage and kindergarten outside of Kyiv. Across Ukraine, thousands of civilians of all
ages are enlisting to
fight. Ukrainian officials called on residents to “make Molotov
cocktails” to defend against the invasion. About 18,000 weapons
have been distributed in the Kyiv region, according to
Ukrainian officials. Nearly 900,000 Ukrainians have fled to neighboring
countries like Poland since the conflict began, according to
a United Nations estimate.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, explained - Vox
Will you support Vox’s explanatory journalism?
Millions turn to Vox to understand what’s happening in the news. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.