“Adjunct professors are the minimum-wage temp
workers of academia. Underpaid, overworked, with no benefits and no job
security, their numbers have ballooned in recent decades. They are part of what
Herb Childress calls ‘hope labor,’ in his new book, The Adjunct
Underclass. Childress quotes researchers who define
hope labor as ‘un- or under-compensated work carried out in the present, often
for experience or exposure, in the hope that future employment opportunities
may follow.’ For most adjuncts, that hope comes to nothing.
“Childress compares the catastrophe of gig
economy college teaching to gig-based employment in other industries like
medicine or taxis. He argues that adjunct teachers are the Uber drivers of
academia. ‘College teaching has become primarily a pickup job … like running
chores for TaskRabbit,’ he writes, reporting that 25 percent of adjuncts depend
on some form of public assistance. His book brings to mind the nearly starving,
peripatetic scholars, wandering from one university to another, teaching and
begging, in medieval Europe.
“The Adjunct Underclass summarizes The Pittsburgh
Post Gazette’s account of the death of
Margaret Mary Vojtko, who died at the age of eighty-three from cancer she
could not afford to treat. She died at her home, for which she could not afford
electricity. She had taught French at Duquesne University for twenty-five
years, never making more than twenty-thousand dollars a year for her six or
more courses and never receiving health benefits or retirement contributions.
The stories you
care about, right at your fingertips
“Childress discusses homeless adjunct
professors who sleep in their cars. He cites the San Francisco
Chronicle and the example of English professor Ellen Tara James Penny.
While teaching four courses per semester at San Jose University in Fall 2017, Penny
‘often drives to a parking lot to grade papers. When it’s dark, she’ll use a
headlamp from Home Depot, so she can continue her work. At night she’ll re-park
in a residential neighborhood and sleep in her 2004 Volvo. She keeps the car
neat to avoid suspicion.’...
“Many adjuncts toil at multiple campuses in a
semester, commuting hundreds of miles each day, working essentially nonstop
except for sleep, as they teach, grade papers and answer multitudinous student
emails. ‘The figure of 45 contract hours is a fiction that conceals 350 hours
of work, maybe 400 and maybe more,’ Childress writes. ‘A $3,600 pretax stipend
with no benefits like healthcare or retirement contributions, spread over 400
hours of work, comes to $9 per hour.’
“As a result, adjuncts are organizing. This
spring, adjunct professors at several Minnesota colleges began agitating for
unions, as reported by the Minneapolis Star Tribune.
Minnesota’s first adjunct union, at Hamline University, has pursued
negotiations for a second contract since July 2018. Meanwhile in January, New
York City-based Mercy College adjunct teachers started a
drive to join the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Recently,
Fordham University adjuncts ratified their first contract, which mandates
substantial pay increases. ‘Nationally about seventy new faculty bargaining
units — all but one for nontenure faculty — have sprung up on private campuses
since 2012,’ according to the Star Tribune.
“By 2016, gig faculty labor at more than 60 schools was organized by
SEIU. In March 2018, ‘University of South Florida adjuncts voted to form a
union…. On April 13 adjunct faculty at the University of Chicago ratified their
first union contract … adjuncts at Loyola University in Chicago,’ also reached
an agreement, according to the Johns Hopkins notice. And Labor Notes recently reported that this past
April, international student workers were key to the success of the University
of Illinois at Chicago graduate employees strike. Unionization is sweeping the
gig faculty labor force, despite fierce management opposition that does not
want to cede money or power to what Childress calls ‘the scavengers, the bottom
feeders, paid by the course as the need arises.’
“Overworked and impermanent, no matter how
excellent their teaching skills, adjuncts lack opportunities to form the sort
of lasting mentoring relationships with students that are associated with
tenured faculty. So, students suffer. And these students are predominately
low-income at community colleges, which employ more adjuncts than four-year
schools — at some, 90 percent of their faculty. Adjuncts, Childress writes, ‘are
camouflaged to look exactly like their [tenure track] counterparts,’ so
students and parents don’t know the difference. This affects lots of students,
because there are so many adjuncts. ‘More than one million people are now
working as contingent faculty [in the U.S.] … providing a cheap labor source,
even while students’ tuition has skyrocketed,’ according to a congressional
Democratic staffer quoted by Childress.
“This faculty precariat constitutes almost
three-quarters of community college teachers who instruct, in turn, 40 percent
of all undergraduates. ‘If community colleges prepare students to mirror their
faculty’s lives as isolated individuals, scratching out a tenuous survival,’
Childress writes, ‘the state [universities] also prepare students to mirror
their own faculty’s lives, with secure enough jobs that provide for the
mortgage, the gold clubs and the new SUV every few years.’ Affluent liberal
arts colleges have far fewer adjuncts, while Ivies and other elite universities
are certainly not training their students for a precarious survival.
“Stanford education professor David Labaree,
quoted by Childress, says ‘stratification is at the heart of American
education. It’s the price we pay for the system’s broad accessibility.’ Just as
100 million economically precarious Americans cling to the bottom rungs of the
U.S. economy, so too in U.S. education, precarious gig faculty labor teaches
those low-income students who can scrape together community college tuition.
Clearly community college students have the greatest need for close mentoring
relationships with their professors, but, as Childress observes, they are the
least likely to get it, since more of their professors are adjuncts.
Ironically, it is students at elite colleges, among the least needy, who get
the most professorial attention.
“Meanwhile, and not coincidentally, this
devaluation of teaching parallels the profession’s feminization. Many adjuncts
are women. Childress cites ‘rising discrimination against occupations after the
entry of women.’ This has happened in medicine, education, law and veterinary
practice. Research ‘shows college grads entering male-dominated fields at
starting salaries far greater than those of college grads entering
female-dominated field.’ Women’s work is not considered important. This
explains why when women enter an occupation, the pay and the standing decline.
“The public-school model provides the best
approach. Early on public education became feminized, thus devalued and
underpaid. But it unionized completely. Adjuncts in higher ed should do the
same, because barring the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, no help other
than unions awaits them.
“The Adjunct Underclass lists five ways that universities have whittled away
teacher pay: fewer people, longer hours; workers redefined as independent
contractors; de-bundled professional activities and the creation of
paraprofessionals; outsourced non-core functions; replacement of humans and
space with technology. And of course, the glut of Ph.D.-credentialed teachers
puts downward pressure on pay.
“Yet colleges and universities still crank out
Ph.D.s, tens of thousands ever year. And every year many, many of those people
don’t get jobs. They join a pool of surplus educational labor that constantly
swells: There are more unemployed adjuncts every year, their increasing numbers
putting downward pressure on pay.
“Years of study, papers, exams, the dissertation,
followed by ferocious competition for academic employment scraps: It’s high
time this sector of the work-force unionized widely, got some benefits for its
precarious piece-work and recognized that tenure is, for most, an impossible
and destructive dream.”
Posted in Truthout.org.
Commentary
Redux:
It is well known that adjunct faculty work without job security,
without the benefit of healthcare, and without an ethical living wage. Most
universities’ priorities are their development of building projects and
technology, renovation of infrastructure, management of revenues and
investments and reducing operating costs, administrative/bureaucratic positions
and salaries, and athletic programs and their resources…
There is no equity for adjunct instructors. Courses staffed with
contingent adjunct faculty cost the same student tuition and provide the same
credits staffed by tenured full-time faculty. Adjunct faculty grade
compositions and tests, write recommendations and advise students, devise and
develop classes, create lesson plans and course materials and improve
curricula, among other unpaid responsibilities.
There are no due process protections for adjunct faculty. There is
no equal pay for equal work. There is no professional advancement. There is no
equity in the lack of health insurance and retirement benefits available for
adjunct faculty. There is little to no inclusion in the way higher education’s
formal decision-making procedures and structures are made. Indeed, adjunct
faculty are simply part-time contractors, “lecturers,” or non-essential
“marginalized” hires who are disenfranchised from high-level governance and
required to carry out most of the responsibilities of the full-time faculty
(and sometimes at multiple institutions), but for less than one-fifth of the
salary of the full-time faculty and without meaningful job security from one
semester to another…
Equally demoralizing is that most full-time faculty do not
sympathize with the adjunct faculty’s plight. Adjunct faculty are generally
without help in their hardship… What is more, most tenured faculty are
unconcerned about the slow moral dissolution of higher education and the
threats to their own security, even though these debasing administrative trends
and practices persist.
Not surprisingly, at Benedictine University where there is
declining student enrollment but increasing student tuition ($33,900 a year
(2017)—though only a fraction of this amount pays for college adjunct
instruction), full-time tenured faculty are given priority for available
classes each semester; thus, an adjunct faculty member’s originally-designed
course will be dropped from the core curriculum, no matter how competent and
dedicated the adjunct instructor is and respected by students.
Nevertheless, if the reduction of courses taught by adjunct
faculty is one of Benedictine University’s severe budgetary constraints, “when
contingent appointments are used, they should include job security and due
process protections. Contingent faculty appointments, like all faculty
appointments, should include: the full range of faculty responsibilities
(teaching, scholarship, service); comparable compensation for comparable work;
assurance of continuing employment after a reasonable opportunity for
successive reviews; inclusion in institutional governance structures; and
appointment and review processes that involve faculty peers and follow accepted
academic due process…" (Background Facts on Contingent Faculty).
Indeed, “[f]or the [Catholic] Church, there is no distinction
between defending human life and promoting the dignity of the human person. Pope
Benedict XVI writes in Caritas in Veritate [Charity in Truth] that ‘The Church
forcefully maintains this link between life ethics and social ethics, fully
aware that a society lacks solid foundations when, on the one hand, it asserts
values such as the dignity of the person, justice and peace, but then, on the
other hand, radically acts to the contrary by allowing or tolerating a variety
of ways in which human life is devalued and violated, especially where it is
weak or marginalized’” (no. 15) (Human Life and Dignity).
Surely, flagrant indifference to the mental and physical
well-being of adjunct faculty is incompatible with the adage “cura personalis”
(care for the entire person). What remains to be seen at universities like
Benedictine and across the nation is the rejoinder to an essential ethical
question: “To what extent can universities be considered [moral and just] while
engaging in practices or ideologies that run contrary to [their Mission,
Vision, and Commitment Statements]? ...Catholic universities have to decide
whether or not running a [consumerist/capitalist academic structure] that
utilizes [and exploits their core adjunct faculty]… fundamentally contradicts
Catholic teaching [and its ideals]. Adjunct pay, [their lack of benefits and
precarious job security… are] not just a [Benedictine] issue — it is an
industry wide issue...” (“The Fordham Ram Unfair Adjunct Wages Go Against Jesuit
Values”).
-Glen Brown
Adjunct Faculty Instructor
For the
entire article, The Continuing Demoralization of University and College Adjunct Faculty, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.