"...Sunday [August 5th], the entire
New York Times Magazine [was] composed of just one article on a single subject:
the failure to confront the global climate crisis in the 1980s, a time when the
science was settled and the politics seemed to align. Written by Nathaniel
Rich, this work of history is filled with insider revelations about roads not
taken that, on several occasions, made me swear out loud. And lest there be any
doubt that the implications of these decisions will be etched in geologic time, Rich’s words are punctuated with
full-page aerial photographs by George Steinmetz that wrenchingly document the
rapid unraveling of planetary systems, from the rushing water where Greenland
ice used to be to massive algae blooms in China’s third largest lake...
"[W]e humans really were on the brink of saving ourselves in
the ’80s, but were swamped by a tide of elite, free-market fanaticism — one
that was opposed by millions of people around the world — then there is
something quite concrete we can do about it. We can confront that economic
order and try to replace it with something that is rooted in both human and
planetary security, one that does not place the quest for growth and profit at
all costs at its center...
"It is absolutely true that the drive for endless growth and
profits stands squarely opposed to the imperative for a rapid transition off
fossil fuels. It is absolutely true that the global unleashing of the unbound
form of capitalism known as neoliberalism in the ’80s and ’90s has been the single
greatest contributor to a disastrous global emission spike in recent decades,
as well as the single greatest obstacle to science-based climate action ever
since governments began meeting to talk (and talk and talk) about lowering
emissions. And it remains the biggest obstacle today, even in countries that
market themselves as climate leaders, like Canada and France.
"But we have to be honest that autocratic industrial socialism
has also been a disaster for the environment, as evidenced most dramatically by
the fact that carbon emissions briefly plummeted when the economies of the
former Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s...
"Let’s acknowledge this fact, while also pointing out that
countries with a strong democratic socialist tradition — like Denmark, Sweden,
and Uruguay — have some of the most visionary environmental policies in the
world. From this we can conclude that socialism isn’t necessarily ecological,
but that a new form of democratic eco-socialism, with the humility to learn
from Indigenous teachings about the duties to future generations and the
interconnection of all of life, appears to be humanity’s best shot at
collective survival..."
For the entire Intercept article by Naomi Klein, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.