“A recent guest view by
the Illinois Policy Institute in the Aug. 22 edition of The State
Journal-Register about public pensions in Illinois purported to lay out a case
to prove that ‘pension reform for Illinois is essential, not impossible’ and
then suggested various reforms.
“However, that opinion
column only exposed some common misconceptions about the actions that have been
taken to overhaul the way public pensions are financed in Illinois. In the last
eight years, Illinois has done more than almost any other state to reform its
public pensions.
“It is incorrect to
claim that the high costs currently paid by state and local governments for
teacher and public employee pensions are the result of ever-increasing salaries
and benefits. The cost is high because Illinois leaders throughout the 20th
century consistently underfunded public pension systems so they could spend
more tax dollars on other priorities.
“Since 1939, Illinois
officials have never once set aside enough money to fully fund the state’s
pension promises. As a result, Illinois now carries an unfunded pension
liability of $129 billion. Currently, 75 percent of the $8.7 billion Illinois
is slated to pay for pensions in fiscal year 2019 is dedicated to the unfunded
liability, not the actual cost of benefits.
“If pensions had been
properly funded over the last 80 years, the state appropriation for pensions
would be an estimated $2.2 billion. That’s a difference — a savings — of $6.5
billion, without even discussing the cost of benefits.
“The guest view also
outlined a four-point program to ‘reform’ public pensions in Illinois. Three of
the four proposals already are law in Illinois.
“The first, a change in
the Illinois Constitution’s Pension Protection Clause to allow ‘unearned future
benefits’ to be altered, has never survived the legislative process. Yet, even
if the state constitution were changed in this way, it would not reduce the
$129 billion unfunded liability. Those benefits already have been earned and
still have to be paid.
“The second — ‘raising
the retirement ages for younger workers’ — was enacted in 2010 as part of the
Tier 2 benefit structure.
“The third — ‘capping
maximum pensionable salary’ — has been part of state law since 1979. In fact,
there are two caps for younger workers because Tier 2 imposes a separate cap on
pensionable wages.
“The fourth — ‘doing away with guaranteed permanent benefit increases in favor
of a true cost-of-living adjustment pegged to inflation’ — was enacted in 2010.
In fact, the cap on the Tier 2 annual increase is stricter because it is one-half
the rate of inflation.
“In addition, since
2010 Illinois officials have passed laws that gradually phase out all state
financial support of teacher and government worker pensions. By design, Tier 2
members ‘overpay.’ They fund 100 percent of their benefits and subsidize Tier 1
benefits with their payroll contributions. Tier 3 benefits, when implemented,
also will be fully funded by members and school districts. In the future, after
the last Tier 1 pension is paid, the state will not pay a dime for any Tier 2
or Tier 3 pensions” (The State Journal-Register, August 28, 2018).
Ha, ha...a double-barreled attack--yet again--by the I.P.I. First, "reminding" teachers that, by decree of Janus, they DON'T have to join unions & "reminding" us all that ILL-Annoy is "broke," so the TRS is an unaffordable "luxury" that we don't deserve.
ReplyDeleteNot buyin' it w/all the money I have from my own, personal
"Golden Parachute." Oh, wait, I'm a pensioner who taught in a lower income school district, not a North Shore retired superintendent (which is who I.P.I. looks at--but names as a "teacher"--in pointing to the 6-figure pension.