“The
sheer volume of Trump scandals can seem difficult to keep track of. There’s the
ongoing special-counsel investigation into whether the Trump campaign aided
a Russian campaign to aid Trump’s candidacy and
defeat his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton; there’s the associated inquiry
into whether the president obstructed justice when he
fired former FBI Director James Comey, whom he had asked not to investigate his
former national-security adviser; there are the president’s hush-money payments to women with whom
he allegedly had extramarital affairs, made through his personal attorney,
Michael Cohen, and facilitated by corporate cash paid to influence the
White House; there is his ongoing effort to interfere with the Russia inquiry and politicize
federal law enforcement; there are the foreign governments that seem to be utilizing the
president’s properties as vehicles for influencing
administration policy; there’s the emerging evidence that Trump campaign
officials sought aid not only from Russia, but from other foreign countries, which may
have affected Trump’s foreign policy; there are the ongoing revelations of the
president’s Cabinet officials’ misusing taxpayer funds; there is the accumulating evidence
that administration decisions are made at the behest of private industry, in
particular those in which Republican donors have significant interests.
“The
preceding wall of text may appear to some as an abridged list of the Trump
administration’s scandals, but this is an illusion created by the perception
that these are all separate affairs. Viewed as such, the various Trump scandals
can seem multifarious and overpowering, and difficult to fathom.
“There
are not many Trump scandals. There is one Trump scandal. Singular: the
corruption of the American government by the president and his associates, who
are using their official power for personal and financial gain rather than for
the welfare of the American people, and their attempts to shield that
corruption from political consequences, public scrutiny, or legal
accountability.
“Take
recent developments: There’s the president’s attempt to aid the Chinese telecom
company ZTE, mere hours after the Chinese government approved funding for a project in the
vicinity of a Trump property in Indonesia. There’s the millions of
dollars corporations paid to Cohen after the
election in an attempt to influence administration policy in their favor.
Trump’s Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney, also the acting
head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, urged banks to pay off politicians in an effort to
weaken the CFPB’s powers legislatively—since taking the helm of
CFPB, Mulvaney has dropped a number of cases against payday lenders who charge
exorbitant interest rates, after taking thousands from the industry as a congressman.
“Environmental
Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt’s own mini-universe of scandals
stems from his improper relationships with industry figures,
his misuse of taxpayer funds, and his attempts to obscure the truth about both.
Trump attempted to pressure the Postmaster
General to increase fees on Amazon in order to punish The Washington
Post, which has published many stories detailing wrongdoing and misbehavior
on the part of the Trump administration, and the Trump campaign before that.
Not long after The New York Times reported that Trump officials
may have solicited campaign help not just from Russia, but also from Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, the president ‘demanded’ that the Justice
Department launch an inquiry into whether the FBI improperly investigated a
campaign that was eagerly soliciting international aid to
swing the election in its favor.
“In
each of these cases, the president or one of his associates was seeking to
profit, personally or financially, from their official duties and powers. When
that conduct has potentially run afoul of the law, Trump has sought to bend
federal law enforcement to his whim, the better to protect himself and his
associates from legal accountability. The president’s ongoing chastising of his
own Justice Department, and his war of words with current and former FBI
officials, stem less from any coherent ideological principle than from Trump’s
desperate need to protect himself. An authoritarian model of law enforcement, where
the president personally decides who is prosecuted and who is not based on his
own political agenda, is simply the best way for Trump to shield himself and
his inner circle from legal consequences.
“The
president’s opponents have yet to craft a coherent narrative about the Trump
administration’s corruption, even though the only major legislative
accomplishment Trump has to his name is cutting his own taxes. But his supporters
have, ironically, crafted an overarching explanation to account for how the
president they voted for, who came to office promising to eliminate official
corruption, has come to embody it.
“The
‘Deep State’ narrative is no more complicated than an attempt to explain the
accumulating evidence of misbehavior on the part of the administration as a
wide-ranging conspiracy to frame the president. The more evidence of wrongdoing
that comes to light, the more certain they are that the conspiracy theory is
true. In their own way, Trump supporters have recognized that Trump’s
burgeoning list of scandals is made of branches from the same twisted tree.
“The
latest Trumptown fable, that the FBI inquiry into the Trump campaign was meant
to aid Clinton’s campaign, is as incoherent as it is absurd. The FBI properly
kept the Russia inquiry under wraps while high-ranking FBI officials defied Justice Department rules and made public
statements about two inquiries into Clinton prior to election
day. Neither of those inquiries led to indictments or guilty pleas; the
special-counsel inquiry has led to more than 20 so far. Had the FBI been
motivated by a political vendetta against Trump, leaking the fact of the
inquiry on its own, even if it uncovered no malfeasance at all, would have been
enough to damage his candidacy. The essential quality of pro-Trump punditry,
however, is that their perception of reality must be warped to conform to the
latest Trump proclamation, even if it contradicts previous Trump pronouncements
or established facts.
“Trump
dictates reality, and his supporters rush to justify whatever has been decreed.
In this way, Trump manages to corrupt not just those in his immediate orbit or
inner circle, but even those who have never met him, who endeavor to reconcile
the insurmountable gap between his words and the world as it exists.
“I
want to emphasize that not everything the administration is doing that I
believe is bad is a scandal, which I am defining as official wrongdoing or
corruption. The president’s ongoing immigration policy, an attempt to displace,
through aggressive deportations of otherwise law-abiding undocumented
immigrants, and the cancellation of Temporary Protected Status and
the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, is a moral travesty but not
necessarily a misuse of his official powers.
“Trump’s
immigration policy is a reflection of his belief that these people from
‘shithole countries’ are inferior and therefore offer little to the
United States. He is hardly the first president to pursue such a policy on such
a basis, but a policy can be morally repugnant without being a scandal.
“The
president’s unwavering commitment to this ethno-nationalism persuades his
followers that he is incorruptible, despite his use of his own powers for
personal gain and profit. ‘You know, I tried to talk about good roads and good
schools and all these things that have been part of my career, and nobody
listened,’ the segregationist George Wallace once said of his rise to power. ‘And then I
began talking about niggers, and they stomped the floor.’ (These days, they
stomp the floor for ‘son of a bitch’ or ‘animals.’) Any effective hustle persuades the
mark that they’re the ones profiting.
“For
those Americans unmoved by such appeals, the ongoing corruption of the official
powers of the U.S. government on behalf of ego, avarice, and impunity should
not be seen as separate stories. They are the same story, and it is the story
of the Trump presidency.”
Adam Serwer is a senior editor at The
Atlantic, covering politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.