Monday, October 27, 2014

401(k) s Are a Fraud by Helaine Olen


“‘For retirement, the answer is 4-0-1-k,’ proclaimed Tyler Mathisen, then editor of Money magazine in 1996. ‘I feel sure that someday, like a financial Little-Engine-That-Could, it will pull me over the million-dollar mountain all by itself.’ For this sentiment, and others like it, Mathisen was soon rewarded with an on-air position at financial news network CNBC, where he remains to this day. As for the rest of us? We were had.

“The United States is on the verge of a retirement crisis. For the first time in living memory, it seems likely that living standards for those over the age of 65 will begin to decline as compared to those who came before them—and that’s without taking into account the possibility that Social Security benefits will be cut at some point in the future.

“The culprit? That same thing Mathisen celebrated: the 401(k), along with the other instruments of do-it-yourself retirement. Not only did they not make us millionaires as self-appointed pundits like Mathisen promised, they left very many of us with very little at all.

“You might be tempted to ask ‘what went wrong,’ but a better question might be ‘why did we ever expect this to work at all?’ It’s not, after all, like we weren’t warned. As early as 1986, only a few years after the widespread debut of the 401(k) and the idea that American workers should self-fund their own retirement accounts based on savings and stock market gains, Karen Ferguson who was then, as she is now, the head of the Pension Rights Center, warned in an op-ed published in the New York Times, ‘Rank-and-file workers have nothing to spare from their paychecks to put into a voluntary plan.’

“But her voice, and that of other critics like economist Teresa Ghilarducci, who is now at the New School and described our upcoming retirement crisis as ‘an abyss’ in 1994 congressional hearings, were drowned out by the money and power of the financial services industry, combined with their enablers in the personal finance media who proclaim even today that if we don’t have enough money set aside for retirement, it is all our own fault. It’s not.

“No one less than John Bogle, the founder of the Vanguard Group, might come forward to declare the American way of retirement savings ‘a train wreck’ — but no matter. A train wreck for you and me is a gravy train for the financial services sector. And in the United States, they are the only group that matters.

“Folly, Fees and Frauds: On their own, the amount of money Americans have put aside for their post-work lives sounds extraordinary. According to the Investment Company Institute, the lobbying arm of the mutual fund industry, we had $20.8 trillion in retirement savings, divided between individual retirement accounts, defined contribution plans, defined benefit plans, government plans and annuity reserves.

“When broken down to the individual level, those numbers add up to nowhere near enough money. According to a recent report issued by the National Institute on Retirement Security, the median amount a family nearing retirement has saved for their post-work lives is $12,000. As for the magical 401(k)? If a household where the earners are between the ages of 55 and 64 does have a retirement account, they barely hit the six-figure mark at $100,000—a far cry from $1 million we’re told we need.

“Yet whether the stock market goes up, down or sideways, the financial services sector makes out when it comes to your retirement accounts. How much do they earn? Astonishingly, we don’t know the answer. In 2008, Bloomberg magazine polled a group of pension consultants and came to the conclusion that 401(k) fees alone totaled $89.1 billion annually. Ghilarducci, who recently took a more all-encompassing look at American retirement assets, and included IRAs and pensions in her total, pegged the number at $500 billion.

“The industry gets away with this because it has what amounts to a captive audience. While there is some evidence that the recent Department of Labor requirement to reveal 401(k) plan fees to participants—something that was not even enacted till last year—has brought expenses down, knowledge does not leave consumers in the driver’s seat. If you discover your company plan is sub-par — the fund choices are poor, or the expenses are too high — all you can do is complain to your human resources department and hope they decide to change plans…

“Half of Americans have no workplace retirement accounts at all. As for the claim that those without workplace retirement savings plans can simply use Individual Retirement Accounts instead? Well, the fees the industry earns on IRAs puts the 401(k) money into the shade. Brokers not working in the best interests of their clients make the vast majority of IRA investment recommendations. Not only is this quite legal, the financial services industry is actively fighting attempts by the Department of Labor to change the situation, claiming it would not be able to afford to offer many low- and middle-income investors advice under an enhanced standard of care.

“Think about this for a moment: the retirement industry is actually admitting it doesn’t have a viable business model if it needs to put its customers first. So instead, the current situation allows for the indiscriminate marketing of all sorts of financial products as long as they meet the standard of ‘suitability,’ which could best be described as ‘okay.’

“Nowhere is this clearer than in the marketing of annuities to the public. Annuities are among the most confusing financial products in existence. When the academic experts discuss the need for Americans to consider purchasing annuities with their retirement savings so they don’t run out of money, they are talking about mean immediate or deferred annuities that is a product that gives you a guaranteed stipend for life in return for a one-time payment of money.

“But the products that make the big money for insurance brokers are the infinitely more complicated variable and equity indexed annuities. These are stock-market based investments. They come with multiple fees for consumers—and, high commissions for those selling them.

“Not surprisingly, the combination of consumer confusion and money incentives causes no small amount of bad behavior by the sellers of annuities. All too many people are sold annuities they have no business purchasing…

“Reality Check: The response by the financial service industry to our retirement crisis has not been self-examination. There has been no attempt to ascertain if it held out a false mirage to millions of Americans. Instead, financial hustlers and their media mouthpieces say the fault lies with Americans who either did not invest their savings properly or don’t have enough money saved up because we spend too much of it.

“This, frankly, ignores reality. Salaries for the majority of us are, when translated into constant dollars, falling. The median household is earning eight percent less income adjusted for inflation today than it did in 2000. In the first quarter of 2013, wages fell by the greatest amount ever recorded.

“At the same time, costs of things we can’t do without continue to rise. College costs have tripled since the early 1980s. The amount of money students are borrowing to pay tuition bills is skyrocketing, and all but doubled from 2005 to 2012 to $1.1 trillion. Healthcare costs have also soared. The New York Times recently reported the cost of giving birth has tripled since 1996. At the same time, patients are increasingly responsible for ever greater amounts of their medical expenses: credit reporting agency Transunion recently claimed an astonishing 22 percent rise in out-of-pocket hospital expenses over the past year.

“People find it all but impossible to save in this environment. Our national savings rate hovered around 10 percent in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Today, it is a little more than 2 percent. Just take a look at what happened when companies began to adopt automatic enrollment plans for 401(k) s, which is, forcing people to opt-out of retirement plans instead of filling out papers to join up. Yes, the number of people contributing to deferred contribution accounts increased – but so too did what industry insiders call ‘the leakage’ rate – that is, people borrowing against or withdrawing the monies in their accounts (and if that money isn’t repaid, the consumers withdrawing it need to pay penalties for accessing it). That number is now close to 25 percent.

“The truth is this: the concept of a do-it-yourself retirement was a fraud. It was a fraud because to expect people to save up enough money to see themselves through a 20- or 30-year retirement was a dubious proposition in the best of circumstances. It was a fraud because it allowed hustlers in the financial sector to prey on ordinary people with little knowledge of sophisticated financial instruments and schemes.

“And it was a fraud because the mainstream media, which increasingly relies on the advertising dollars of the personal finance industry, sold expensive lies to an unsuspecting public. When combined with stagnating salaries, rising expenses and a stock market that did not perform like Rumpelstiltskin and spin straw into gold, do-it-yourself retirement was all but guaranteed to lead future generations of Americans to a financially insecure old age. And so it has.”

Helaine Olen is the author of "Pound Foolish: Exposing the Dark Side of the Personal Finance Industry" and writes The Money Blog for The Guardian. 

To read the complete article, Click Here.

4 comments:

  1. from Dave Madsen:

    “Who needs a pension or Social Security? For my retirement, I’m procuring a large appliance cardboard box which I will insulate with crumpled up Chicago Tribune pages. Then I’ll locate the best underpass, where I will seek an extra layer of protection from rain, hail, and snow. I will bathe daily in Salt Creek as it runs through Wood Dale, Illinois before shuffling to my full-time job at the Super Walmart (the only retail outlet left in America), where I will work as the “old greeter guy with no teeth.” I will take my 50 cent an hour paycheck to the Payday Loan outlet so I can purchase ketchup to spice up my open-garbage-can-flame-roasted fillet of sewer rat. And the vacations!!!! If I ever get a couple days off in a row, I’ll hop a freight train and head out West in the springtime so I can drag some catfish from their spawning places on the banks of the Mississippi and have a dinner fit for a king. Ah, the golden years! I’m looking forward to them.”

    ReplyDelete
  2. A Defined-Contribution Savings 401(k) Plan:

    1) A defined-contribution savings plan (401(k), 403(b), 457) was not initially created as a retirement vehicle but rather as a supplementary savings account;
    2) A defined-contribution savings plan shifts all the responsibilities and all of the risk from the employer to you; thus, your benefit is not guaranteed for life;
    3) Your benefit ceases when your account is exhausted;
    4) There are no survivor or disability benefits and guarantees;
    5) Your benefit is based upon individual investment earnings;
    6) You assume all funding, investment fees, and inflationary and longevity risks;
    7) A defined-contribution savings plan does not have the pooled investments, professional asset managers, and shared administrative costs that a defined-benefit pension plan provides;
    8) Though you bear no portability risks, accounts are not always rolled over when you change jobs;
    9) Changeover costs to this plan could be significant;
    10) Your employer (state) will have to bear the administrative costs of both defined-benefit pension and defined-contribution savings plans when you switch over;
    11) “Payments to amortize unfunded liabilities for the defined-benefit pension plan may be accelerated” (National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS, 2011);
    12) The Governmental Accounting Standards Board “requires [an] acceleration of unfunded liability payments when the defined-benefit pension plan is closed to be recognized on financial statements” (NIRS, 2011);
    13) “No unfunded obligations [liabilities] for existing members are reduced when new members go into a defined-contribution savings plan” (NIRS, 2011);
    14) “The loss of new members makes it difficult to finance the unfunded obligations of the defined-benefit pension plan” (NIRS, 2011);
    15) The State of Illinois will not save money. Most of the State’s obligation to TRS is for contributions not paid during the past several decades; therefore, the deferred cost of underfunding cannot be eliminated by switching to a defined-contribution savings plan;
    16) Shifting to a defined-contribution savings plan can raise annual costs by making it more difficult for Illinois to pay down existing liabilities. The plan will include fewer employees and fewer contributions going forward;
    17) Even with a defined-contribution savings plan option, states and localities are still left to deal with past underfunding;
    18) There is a several trillion dollar deficit between what 401(k) account holders should have and what they actually have.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A Defined-Benefit Pension Plan:

    1) You cannot outlive your benefit;
    2) Your defined-benefit pension plan is more cost efficient than the defined-contribution savings plan;
    3) Your defined-benefit pension plan offers predictable, guaranteed monthly benefits for life;
    4) Funds are invested by professional asset managers in a diversified portfolio that follows long-term investment strategies;
    5) The large-pooled assets reduce asset management and miscellaneous fees;
    6) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides spousal (survivor) financial benefits;
    7) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides disability benefits;
    8) The state is responsible for funding, investment, inflationary and longevity risks;
    9) Because you are not affected by Market volatility, your defined-benefit pension plan is a more effective protection than the defined-contribution savings plan;
    10) Because teachers understand the value of such a plan, they are willing to give up higher wages;
    11) A defined-benefit plan encourages a long-term career and stable workforce;
    12) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides you with self-sufficiency in retirement; it is associated with far fewer households that experience food privation, shelter adversity and health-care hardship;
    13) Your defined-benefit pension plan is less expensive for taxpayers than Social Security – a reason why legislators, et al. had negotiated for Illinois teachers to not pay into Social Security;
    14) The Teachers Retirement System of Illinois is the 37th largest in the U.S. with 406,855 members (TRS, 2017);
    15) The average investment returns for TRS: 8.8% (for 1986-2016) (TRS, 2016) and 7.54% (for 1996-2016) (TRS, 2017);
    16) Your defined-benefit pension plan has an economic impact of over $4 billion on Illinois; the effect on Gross Domestic Product is $2.38 billion; jobs that are created: 30,448 (TRS, 2013);
    17) Defined-benefit pension plans contribute over $100 billion to annual local, state, and federal revenue in the U.S. and provide capital to financial markets (NIRS, 2011).

    Sources: the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS), Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and the Teachers' Retirement System of Illinois (TRS)

    ReplyDelete