·
The
state’s revenue problem and pension debt need to become the focus and conversation in
the upcoming legislative sessions and in the media;
·
According to the
National Association of State Retirement Administrators, policymakers must
“keep in mind that state and local pensions accumulate and pay out assets over
decades. They have an extended investment horizon.” Therefore, the focus should be on structural
tax reform and not pension reform, where public employees are victimized once again
and the state’s debt is not resolved;
·
There needs to be
a modernization of state and local budgets and their revenue systems. “The
structural problems that have built up over time in these systems need to be
addressed” (The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities);
·
“[Moreover,] at
the core of the budget crisis facing [Illinois] is [its] regressive state tax
structure… that is, low-and-middle-income families pay a greater share of their
income in taxes than the wealthy… [A
regressive tax] disproportionately impacts low-income people because, unlike
the wealthy, [low-income people] are forced to spend a majority of their income
purchasing basic needs that are subject to sales taxes” (United for a Fair
Economy);
·
“Since the rich are able to save a
much larger share of their incomes than middle-income families – and since the
poor [can] rarely save at all – the taxes are inherently regressive” (The
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, ITEP). Illinois income tax uses a
single-rate structure that results in low-income wage earners paying more taxes
than the wealthy. Illinois is among 10 states in the nation with the highest
taxes paid by its poorest citizens at 13 percent (ITEP);
·
Shifting
the state’s “normal costs” for the public pension systems to school districts
is just another irresponsible victimization of Illinois citizens: “Property tax
bases would not be sufficient to absorb any shift in the employer normal cost
for teacher pensions… School districts are demographically and financially
varied, and it would be difficult to impose a uniform normal cost shift on
them… Illinois ranks last in terms of state spending on K-12 education, and
school districts are already relying heavily on local property taxes… While
shifting the state’s normal cost obligations onto school districts may provide
some relief to the state’s budget, it will not mitigate these financial
obligations and will instead push them onto school districts that, on average,
already derive the majority of their revenue from local sources” (The Center
for Tax and Budget Accountability, CTBA, March 2012);
·
Illinois
has a structural revenue problem. The Illinois
citizenry has been brainwashed to believe (by some policymakers, the Civic Federation, and the Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago/Illinois Is Broke) that the public pension systems are
contributing factors to the state’s deficits. The public pension systems are not the cause of the
state’s budget deficits;
·
Address the
pension debt problem. The current “Pension Ramp” does not work for the five
public pension systems. The “Pension Ramp” entails larger payments today as a result of the 1995 funding law – Public Act
88-593 – to pay the pensions systems what the state owes;
·
According to
Amanda Kass, Research and Policy Specialist for Pensions and Local Government
of the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, (April 2012): “The issue is
that Illinois lawmakers designed a system – the way the employer cost is
calculated (what the state pays) – [that is] inconsistent with rules set by the
Government Accounting Standards Board (the rules are non-binding and are for
reporting; public retirement systems can fund themselves however they so
choose). The way GASB specifies that systems should be funded is generally
referred to as the ARC (annual required contribution);
·
“According to
GASB, the employer’s ARC should be the normal cost (which is calculated using
the cost method) plus an amount to amortize an unfunded liability over 30
years. The 30-year time period is an open system; [in other words,] those 30
years don’t count down. In systems in which there is no unfunded liability, the
employer’s ARC would just be the normal cost. In Illinois, what the state has
historically paid was less than the employer’s ARC (as calculated according to
GASB rules). Then there were years like 2006 and 2007 in which lawmakers passed
legislation that lowered the contributions for those years to an amount that
was below the ‘Pension Ramp’ (those amounts were already less than the
employer’s ARC). In addition to a
revenue problem, the ‘Pension Ramp’ was designed in such a way that it’s
unfeasible. Even if Illinois’ revenue issue was addressed, the ‘Pension Ramp’
would still likely be an issue.”
Solutions
·
To address the pension debt problem caused by policymakers' theft and irresponsibility, there
needs to be a required annual payment from the state to the pension systems;
the debt needs to be amortized for a longer frame of time (a flat payment) just
like a home loan that is amortized; though the initial payment will be more
painful in the beginning, over the long term it will become a reduced cost and a smaller percentage of
the overall Illinois budget as it is paid off throughout the years;
·
To address the revenue problem that policymakers choose to ignore: with a constitutional amendment, “given an appropriately
designed graduated-rate structure, Illinois could cut the overall state income
tax burden for 94 percent of all taxpayers—on average providing a tax cut to
every taxpayer with less than $150,000 in base income annually, raise at least
$2.4 billion more in revenue, and keep the effective individual income tax rate
for millionaires well below five percent…
Illinois taxpayers with the bottom 94 percent of base income
collectively would receive an annual tax cut of $1.06 billion… [T]he combined
effect of this policy would be a stimulus to the economy from tax cuts and
additional state spending (assuming that the additional revenue is used to fund
current public services that would otherwise not be funded) that would create
at least 36,000 private sector jobs in communities across Illinois…” (CTBA);
·
Furthermore, the state should tax services. Illinois is one of five states
with sales taxes on fewer than 20 services (The Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities);
·
Establish a financial transaction tax or
“Robin Hood Tax”: a .50 cent tax on every $100 of transacting. “We used to have
a financial transaction tax in this country from 1914 to 1966” (Bill Moyers);
·
Eliminate the tax loophole for “Tax Increment
Financing Districts” and save “$1.2 billion a year” (Greg Leroy from a national
policy resource center for corporate and government accountability in
Washington, DC, GoodJobsFirst.org);
·
“Broaden the sales tax base to include
selected consumer services for an estimated new revenue of $550 million a year”
(Illinois Education Association, IEA);
·
Eliminate “Edge Tax Credits” for large
corporations and save “$347 million a year”; eliminate “Accelerated Depreciation”
or “write offs” of all assets and save “$333 million a year” (Leroy);
·
Reinstitute “fund sweeps”: surplus revenue
should be added to the General Revenue Fund “for an estimated new revenue of
$300 million a year” (IEA);
·
Add “exceeded revenue” from the Road Fund
(motor vehicle and driver’s license fees) to the General Revenue Fund “for an
estimated new revenue of $250 million a year”; reduce aggregate
transfers/eliminate “some statutory transfers” from the General Revenue Fund
“for an estimated new revenue of $200 million a year” (IEA);
·
Eliminate “Single Sales Factor” that “allows
large corporations to cut their taxes 80-90% and save “$96-217 million a year”;
eliminate “Vendor Discounts” that allow companies “to keep an uncapped part of
their state taxes as a ‘processing’ fee” and save “$126 million a year”
(Leroy);
·
Eliminate or cap the “retailers’ discount”
that businesses keep: 1.75% of sales taxes paid for by the rest of us “for an
estimated new revenue of $100 million a year” (IEA);
·
Increase taxation on the wealthy: Illinois is
in the top 10 of regressive state tax systems where the wealthiest taxpayers do
not pay as much of their incomes in taxes as the poorest and middle-income wage
earners (The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy);
·
Implement a more timely system of payments
(cash management practices are greatly affected by budgetary practices in
relation to deferred liabilities which place additional pressures particularly
in the first and second quarters of the year to pay those expenses; timing of
tax payments also affects the state's cash flow and should be adjusted
accordingly);
·
Examine and improve the efficiency of the
state’s government;
·
There should be term limits for Illinois policymakers.
We cannot forget
that Illinois legislators have diverted nearly $15 billion from the Teachers’
Retirement System and more than $30 billion intended for the five pension
systems over the past decades. General Assemblies have created half of the pension systems’
unfunded liabilities and, as a result, the State of Illinois has a serious REVENUE
PROBLEM that must be resolved. Teachers and other public employees did not cause the revenue and debt problems in Illinois. Teachers paid 9.4 percent of their total earnings each year into their pension system.
There is a legal basis for protection of public pension rights and benefits in the State of Illinois. It is called Article XIII, Section 5 of the Illinois Constitution. It is unconscionable to coerce teachers and other public employees to pay for the state's heinous irresponsibility and corruption.
-Glen Brown
Please also read:
"Background on Illinois Corporate Tax Loopholes."
There is a legal basis for protection of public pension rights and benefits in the State of Illinois. It is called Article XIII, Section 5 of the Illinois Constitution. It is unconscionable to coerce teachers and other public employees to pay for the state's heinous irresponsibility and corruption.
-Glen Brown
Please also read:
"Background on Illinois Corporate Tax Loopholes."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.