Friday, October 31, 2025

Funding for Food for 42 million low-income Americans

 


(Reuters) -A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown and directed it to use contingency funds to pay for the benefits. 

U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Providence issued a temporary restraining order at the behest of cities, nonprofits and a union that argued the U.S. Department of Agriculture's suspension of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, known as SNAP or food stamps, starting Saturday was unlawful. 

He ruled from the bench minutes after another judge in Boston ruled that suspension was likely unlawful in a related case pursued by a coalition of Democratic-led states that also sought to avert the suspension. 

"There is no doubt, and it is beyond argument that irreparable harm will begin to occur if it hasn't already occurred in the terror, it has caused some people about the availability of funding for food, for their family," McConnell said during a virtual hearing. 

The USDA has said insufficient funds exist to pay full benefits to 42 million low-income Americans, as they cost $8.5 billion to $9 billion per month. The Trump administration contends the agency lacks authority to pay them until Congress passes a spending bill ending a government shutdown that began October 1. 

The plaintiffs, represented by the liberal legal advocacy group Democracy Forward, argued the agency's decision to suspend benefits was wrong and unlawful, as the USDA still had funds available to fulfill its obligation to pay SNAP benefits. 

Such available funding includes $5.25 billion in contingency funds that Congress has previously provided the USDA for use when "necessary to carry out program operations," the plaintiffs said. 

Aside from the contingency funds, the plaintiffs argued that a separate fund with around $23 billion in it could also be utilized to avoid what would be an unprecedented suspension of SNAP benefits. 

(Reporting by Nate Raymond; editing by Noeleen Walder, Rami Ayyub and Deepa Babington)

 

Protect Immigrant Rights

 Solidarity in Action Protect Immigrant Rights, Build Collective Power on Wednesday, November 5 at 7pm ET/4pm PT

Federal agents are being deployed across the US to disappear our neighbors, friends, and families off the street. What can we do? Register for Solidarity in Action: Protect Immigrant Rights, Build Collective Power with special guest Maribel Hernández Rivera on Wednesday, November 5, at 7pm ET/4pm PT to find out.

Immigration is the backbone of the American dream -- but there has never been a time when this country has truly welcomed all immigrants safely. And right now, the federal government is enacting a campaign of cruelty on our communities that is ripping families apart and disappearing human beings off the street, from their jobs, even from their homes.

On this call, National Director of Immigrant Community Strategies for the ACLU Maribel Hernández Rivera will help allies show up for immigrant communities as they face potential law enforcement encounters. You’ll learn bystander and immigrant rights during these interactions, alongside practical strategies to safely and effectively act as an ally.

Maribel Hernández Rivera is the National Director of Immigrant Community Strategies at the American Civil Liberties Union and previously served as District Director for Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Maribel received her J.D. from New York University School of Law, her Masters in Public Affairs from Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs, and her A.B. from Harvard University. Upon law school graduation, Maribel served as law clerk to the Honorable Mary M. Schroeder in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She is a native Spanish speaker, and her professional and lived experience has centered around advocating for immigrants' rights.


Advancing Our Values -- Solidarity in Action Training Series

Solidarity in Action is our speaker series bringing together Indivisibles from across the country to learn from experts on systemic change and allyship. Authoritarianism succeeds when it targets vulnerable populations and everyone turns aside. We will not look away. With this speaker series, we’re going to learn how to better support impacted communities from experts in the field.

Here’s a preview of what’s to come:

Resilience for Sustainable Activism on Thursday, December 4, at 7pm ET/4pm PT.

For up-to-date recordings of previous sessions, you can always check out the Advancing Our Values website. For now, here are the recordings of sessions you may have missed so far:

Solidarity In Action Speaker Series Kick-Off

Building Partnerships & Coalitions w/ author Cristina Jimenez

Creating Mutual Aid and Community Response Teams (Pt. 1)

Creating Mutual Aid and Community Response Teams (Pt. 2)

Understanding Systemic Oppression and Privilege


Next Wednesday’s training is for action -- action you can take immediately to help protect your immigrant and at-risk neighbors. You’ll leave ready to defend your neighbors in the moment and build the collective power that we need to continue to fight back. Join us next Wednesday at 7pm ET/4pm PT.

In solidarity,
Indivisible Team

 

Trump’s Border Patrol Bulldog

 


On Oct. 27, the Washington Examiner reported the Trump administration’s quiet removal of Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office directors in Denver, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Phoenix and San Diego. These officials — career civil servants with decades in immigration enforcement — were told their services were no longer needed. The replacements come from Customs and Border Protection, an agency with different mandates, training and operational culture. This is not just personnel churn, but signals a major shift in border enforcement tactics toward cities, nationalizing the model tested in California and Chicago under CBP commander Gregory Bovino. 

Earlier this year, Bovino gave the administration the template when he deployed Border Patrol units hundreds of miles from U.S. borders, publicly confronted local officials and staged enforcement theatrics as shows of federal authority. The ICE leadership removals turn these tactics into standard structure. The logic of the border is being relocated inward, with senior Border Patrol agents inserted into positions that have historically prioritized administrative discretion and coordination with local governments. The “wild west” is suddenly everywhere.

Bovino is where this shift becomes visible. On a September afternoon in Chicago, he was filmed outside the Broadview ICE facility, unmasked among a scrum of masked agents. He is the public face of what Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker calls the “march toward autocracy.” The 55-year-old career bureaucrat is the low-rent Douglas MacArthur of a federal invasion, overseeing operations involving the tear-gassing and pepper-balling of lawful protesters and journalists. His visibility has always been strategic, a performance of authority that sends the message: The federal government will no longer defer to local resistance in sanctuary cities.

The 55-year-old career bureaucrat is the low-rent Douglas MacArthur of a federal invasion.

A career operator shaped by the post-9/11 security state, Bovino earned his bachelor’s degree magna cum laude and completed two master’s degrees (one from the National War College) before beginning his three-decade tenure with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. He was assigned to Honduras, Egypt and Africa before taking on senior posts in New Orleans and El Centro, California.

His rise stalled in August 2023, when he was relieved of command of the El Centro sector 30 minutes after delivering congressional testimony critical of the Biden administration’s border strategy. Official explanations cited unspecified “inappropriate” social media posts and an online profile photo showing Bovino holding an M4 assault rifle. But the core transgression was no mystery: He had stepped out of the role of neutral administrator and into the role of political actor.

When President Donald Trump returned to office, what had been a reprimand became a qualification. In June 2025, Bovino was placed in charge of large-scale interior enforcement operations, leading Operation At Large in California and Operation Midway Blitz in Chicago, with discussions underway for Boston and San Francisco. (The latter was called off in October after sustained protests forced a partial retreat). 

Under Trump, unprofessional shows of force are not a liability, but are valued for the spectacle they produce. Gregory Bovino exemplifies this, visibly and enthusiastically. 

By late last summer, Operation At Large had pushed Border Patrol far from the actual border and made immigration enforcement a mobile campaign. When the focus shifted to Chicago, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem labeled the city a “war zone.” When Mayor Brandon Johnson barred federal agents from using city-owned property, Bovino replied on camera: “If someone steps in the way … that may not work out well for them, and if we need to effect an arrest of a U.S. citizen or anyone else, then we’ll do that.”

Meanwhile, the legal groundwork for transforming political protest into domestic terrorism was finalized. On April 28, Trump signed an executive order titled Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement that rolled back consent decrees (which limited police power) and created indemnification guarantees for officers accused of misconduct.

Then, in September, the memorandum on Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence, known as NSPM-7, widened the definition of “domestic terrorism” to include the nonprofit infrastructure around protest movements, authorizing joint terrorism task forces to investigate donors and support networks. In parallel, ICE’s social media monitoring hub began flagging so-called domestic terrorism targets, shifting a border security apparatus inward toward domestic surveillance.

The ICE leadership removals are integral to the functioning of this broader framework. Replacing career field office directors with senior Border Patrol officials imports the California and Chicago model into the permanent structure of interior enforcement. What were temporary surge operations are the new bureaucratic baseline. The tactical mindset refined at the physical border is now shaping the administrative norms that shape ICE’s expanding interior mission.

This was visible on Sept. 30 when tactical units raided an apartment complex on South Shore Drive in Chicago. Thirty-seven people were detained, including women, children and U.S. citizens. One resident, Tony Wilson, described his door being cut open with a grinder before agents zip-tied him and held him for hours. This echoes 2020’s Operation Legend, when masked DHS tactical teams executed smaller-scale raids in the city under the pretext of protecting federal property during that summer’s protests.

As Bovino rises in command, the transition he is meant to oversee has hit legal speed bumps in the form of multiple federal civil rights lawsuits that name him as a defendant. In July, a federal judge found that immigration stops in Southern California were predicated on factors like race, language, occupation and location in issuing a temporary restraining order that was later lifted by the Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent noted that the ruling subjects “countless people in the Los Angeles area” to the indignity of being detained “simply because of their looks, their accents, and the fact they make a living by doing manual labor.” The ACLU’s class-action lawsuit over Operation Return to Sender alleged that agents coerced detainees into signing voluntary departure waivers. 

A Chicago Headline Club lawsuit accused federal forces of systematic First Amendment violations, including the use of force against journalists, clergy and elected officials.

The not-so-hidden objective is to place border patrol at the center of domestic law enforcement.

The not-so-hidden objective is to place border patrol at the center of domestic law enforcement, with the first model operations documented and distributed by the agencies themselves. On Star Wars Day (May the 4th), Bovino shared a “Border Wars” trailer casting the El Centro Sector Border Patrol as Darth Vader battling “fake news,” “sanctuary cities” and “invasion.” When a federal judge issued the Los Angeles restraining order, Bovino dismissed it on social media as a “very poorly written (very poorly) temp restraining order.”

Deploying units inside dense urban environments increases the likelihood of escalation for both officers and residents, but the Trump administration seems to see such conflict as a feature, not a bug. The replacement of ICE field office directors with senior Border Patrol officials shows that the experiment of Bovino’s approach has been deemed successful and has been formalized, leading to more unrest and harder crackdowns.

The border now exists wherever enforcement is staged. The aborted San Francisco surge showed that public resistance can still force a pause, but the broader shift continues. Where it stops, nobody knows. But Bovino suggested one ominous destination in August when he sent his agents to crash a press conference held by California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democratic leaders. The subject? How the state can resist GOP efforts to gerrymander a permanent lock on Congress.

-Truthdig

Trump’s Border Patrol Bulldog - Truthdig

 

Thursday, October 30, 2025

"The genocide in Gaza is not a freakish anomaly. It is a harbinger of what awaits us as the ecosystem disintegrates and governments embrace climate fascism" -Chris Hedges

Gaza does not mark the end of the settler colonial project. It marks, I fear, its final phase. Western states, enriched by their own occupations and genocides — in India, Africa, Asia, Latin America and North America — are returning to their roots as they face a global climate crisis and the obscene levels of social inequality that they engineer and sustain.

As the world breaks down, as the climate crisis drives millions and then tens of millions and then hundreds of millions of people north, in a desperate search for survival, the genocide in Gaza, which Israel is slow walking until it can resume its usual murderous pace, will replay itself over and over and over until the fragile social and environmental networks that hold the global community together disintegrate.

The refusal to extract ourselves from fossil fuels, the steady saturation of the atmosphere with carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), ensures soaring temperatures in which most life, including human life, will eventually be unsustainable. The global average concentration of CO2 surged by 3.5 parts per million, from June 2023 to June 2024, to reach an average of 422.8 parts per million, according to the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration. The following twelve months saw an even further increase of 2.6 parts per million of CO2. Violent conflicts, already exacerbated by extreme weather and water scarcity, will erupt across the globe with volcanic fury.

There is no mystery as to why the genocide is funded and sustained by Israel’s Western allies. There is no mystery as to why these states flout the Geneva Conventions, the International Court of Justice, the Arms Trade Treaty, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and international humanitarian law. There is no mystery as to why the United States has given a staggering $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since Oct. 7, 2023 and has repeatedly blocked resolutions at the United Nations censoring Israel, in what the latest U.N report on Gaza calls an “internationally enabled crime.”

The U.S. accounts for two-thirds of Israel’s weapons imports. But it is not alone. The report names 63 countries that are complicit in “Israel’s genocidal machinery” in Gaza.

In the words of a report from the Quincy Institute and Costs of War project, published on Oct. 7 of this year, “[w]ithout U.S. money, weapons and political support, the Israeli military could not have committed such rapid, widespread destruction of human lives and infrastructure in Gaza, or escalated its warfare so easily to the regional level by bombing Syria, Lebanon, Qatar and Iran.”

There is no mystery as to why thousands of citizens from the U.S., Russia, France, Ukraine and the United Kingdom serve in the Israeli occupying forces and are not held accountable for their participation in genocide.

“Many States, primarily Western ones, have facilitated, legitimized and eventually normalized the genocidal campaign perpetrated by Israel,” the U.N. report, compiled by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Francesca Albanese, reads. “By portraying Palestinian civilians as ‘human shields’ and the broader onslaught in Gaza as a battle of civilization against barbarism, they have reproduced the Israeli distortions of international law and colonial tropes, seeking to justify their own complicity in genocide.”

According to the report, by September 2024, the U.S. had supplied Israel with “57,000 artillery shells, 36,000 rounds of cannon ammunition, 20,000 M4A1 rifles, 13,981 anti-tank missiles and 8,700 MK-82 500lb bombs. By April 2025, Israel had 751 active sales valued at $39.2 billion.

We will see this again. The same mass killing. The same demonization of the poor and the vulnerable. The same tropes about saving Western civilization from barbarism. The same callous indifference to human life. The same lies. The same billions of dollars in profits extracted by the war industry that will be used to suffocate not only those outside our gates, but those within them.

How will the wealthiest nations react when their coastal cities flood, their crop yields plummet and drought and floods displace millions internally? How will they replace dwindling resources? How will they cope with hundreds of millions of climate refugees pounding at their gates? How will they respond to social upheaval, declining living standards, crumbling infrastructure and societal breakdown?

They will do what Israel does.

They will use disproportionate violence to keep the desperate at bay. They will steal the fertile land, the aquifers and the rivers and lakes. They will seize by force the rare earth minerals, natural gas fields and oil. And they will kill anyone who gets in the way. Damn the United Nations. Damn the international courts. Damn international humanitarian law. The industrial states are cementing into place, as Christian Parenti writes, a “climate fascism,” a politics “based on exclusion, segregation and repression.”

“What we are seeing in Gaza is the rehearsal of the future,” Colombian President Gustavo Petro argued at the COP28 U.N. Climate Change Conference in 2023.

The masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) goons deployed on our streets to terrorize undocumented workers will show up at our door. The concentration camps, now being built across the country, will have room for us. The law, twisted to persecute an array of fictional internal enemies, will criminalize dissent and freedom of expression. The billionaires and oligarchs will retreat into gated compounds, mini-Versailles, where they will feed their insatiable lusts for power, greed and hedonism.

In the end, the ruling billionaire class too will become victims, although they may be able to hold out a little longer than the rest of us. Industrial nations will not be saved by their border walls, internal security, expulsion of migrants, missiles, fighter jets, navies, mechanized units, drones, mercenaries, artificial intelligence, mass surveillance or satellites.

Before this final extinction takes place, however, huge segments of the human species, along with other species, will be consumed in an orgy of fire and blood. Gaza, unless there is a rapid reversal in how our societies are configured and ruled, is a window into the future. It is not a freakish anomaly. War will be the common denominator of human existence. The strong will take from the weak.

The destruction of civil society in Gaza is the template. Chaos is the objective. Subject populations are controlled by arming proxy militias and criminal gangs, as Israel has done in Gaza, along with its arming of rogue Jewish militias in the West Bank. They are controlled — as Israel has done — by banning the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East to block humanitarian aid. 

They are controlled — as Israel has also done by destroying hospitalsclinicsbakerieshousingwastewater treatment plantsfood distribution sitesschoolscultural centers and universities, along with assassinating its educated elite including over 278 Palestinian journalists. When life is reduced to subsistence level, when disease and malnutrition is endemic, resistance can be broken.

Language in this emerging dystopia bears no correlation to reality. It is absurdist. Israel, for example, has violated the current ceasefire agreement from its inception, but the fiction of a “ceasefire” is maintained. Israel apparently “has a right to defend itself” although it is the occupier and perpetrator of apartheid and genocide and the Palestinian resistance poses no existential threat.

The “Trump Plan,” supposedly formulated to end the genocide, offers no route to Palestinian self-determination, no mechanism to hold Israel accountable and proposes to hand Gaza over to updated versions of imperial viceroys, with Israel controlling the borders.

The struggle for Palestine is our struggle. The denial of freedom for Palestinians is the first step in the loss of our freedom. The terror that defines life in Gaza will become our terror. The genocide will become our genocide.

We must fight these battles while we still have a chance. The openings for resistance are closing with alarming speed. We must, through civil disobedience, shut down the machine. We must remake the world. This means removing the ruling global class. It means demolishing a society constructed around the mania for capitalist expansion. It means ending our reliance on fossil fuels. It means enforcing international law and dismantling Israel’s settler colonial and genocidal rule. If we do not succeed, Palestinians will be the first victims. But they won’t be the last.

The Chris Hedges Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 


Bank of America’s Top 5 Predictions That Are About to Shake Up the Economy

 



1. AI and Robots Will Boost Productivity, but Jobs Will Change

While it’s easy to say, “AI will change everything,” in many ways, this is just a reality of the new economy. With the rise of AI agents as well as advanced robotics, many industries are in for a job shake-up. Many jobs will be done by machines and AI tools in places like factories, hospitals and even delivery.

In the report, Bank of America (BofA) said of agentic AI: “These fully autonomous agent and robot fleets may ultimately alter verticals heavily reliant on human capital and spark a corporate efficiency revolution that transforms the global economy.”

But these changes don’t mean everyone will lose their job — just that the jobs needed will evolve. This means your pay could increase if you work in the tech or science industry, but this will require upskilling in order to take advantage of the coming changes.

Bottom line: The economy might pick up speed, but only if people can keep up with the changes and get new training to handle new processes created by the rise of AI.

2. Shortages in Energy and Materials Could Raise Prices

We’re already seeing the high power and resource demand that large AI models need, and it will only get worse. The BofA report states, “The rise of AI is accelerating demand for data, computing power, bandwidth and expanded infrastructure such as energy, water, commodities and data centers.”

With the demand rising, supply could become constrained, leading to higher prices for natural resources, but also more jobs and technological advancements to extract those resources. Investors will want to pay particular attention to the price of precious metals and suppliers of technology (such as NVIDIA) as the demand continues to increase.

Bottom line: Inflation may calm down overall, but the price of some natural resources that supply energy and tech materials could stay expensive.

3. Big Building Boom in Clean Energy and Infrastructure

Oxford Economics states that the world needs about $94 trillion in new infrastructure by 2040, including new roads, bridges, power lines, and water systems. This is an increased spend of about $500 billion more every year by 2030 — on top of government spending.

Clean energy is a huge focus, with over $1 trillion in private investments already promised since 2021 for things like computer chip factories, clean energy and electric vehicles. Investors will want to pay attention to utilities company investments and expansion in companies that take on huge infrastructure projects (such as commercial construction companies).

Bottom line: Expect high growth and jobs in construction, engineering, and technology, but the U.S. debt will most likely continue to balloon to fund these projects.

4. Countries Will Compete Harder Over Technology

Global competition is already at the forefront of the push into AI and robotic technology, and the next five years won’t slow down. Bank of America said this could lead to more populism, especially with Trump instituting tariffs. This could increase competition over tech, and slow global trade over the next five years.

“Global capital, goods, and services are unlikely to flow as freely as they did in the 1990s/early aughts, and lower supply causes higher prices, all things equal, especially if ‘Europe First’ and ‘China First’ policies take shape,” said the BofA report.

Bottom line: This could lead to nations building independent supply chains to build new technology and continue increasing import tariffs to encourage building everything within their own borders.

5. Cybercrime Will Get Much Worse 

The BofA report states that cybercrime — such as hacking, fake videos and stealing personal data — is expected to cost the world $10.5 trillion by 2025 and $15.6 trillion by 2030. And with the exponential rise of AI deep fake videos and phone calls, these crimes will become more effective and harder to stop.

This rise in online threats will cause both businesses and governments to spend much more on cybersecurity (especially in the U.S.) in areas like banking, defense and infrastructure. This could increase profits for security companies and open the door to online security innovation.

Bottom line: Online risks will drag down growth unless security spending keeps up, but cybersecurity itself could end up becoming its own business sector.

-Jacob Wade

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.comBank of America’s Top 5 Predictions That Are About To Shake Up the Economy

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

"I could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines" into any American city

 


Washington — President Trump told reporters Wednesday that he has the authority to send U.S. military forces beyond the National Guard into U.S. cities, claiming not even the courts could stop him, but said that hasn't been necessary so far. 

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One during his trip to Asia, the president said he could send the "Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines," and "anybody I wanted" into U.S. cities and would do so "if I thought it was necessary." Earlier in his trip, the president told U.S. troops at the Yokosuka naval base near Tokyo that he was prepared to send "more than the National Guard" into U.S. cities if needed.

Asked whether he meant sending other branches of the military into U.S. cities, Mr. Trump said Wednesday, "You know if I want to enact a certain act, I'm allowed to do it routinely," an apparent reference to the Insurrection Act, which allows the military to act in a law enforcement capacity to suppress a rebellion or quell domestic violence. The authority that has not been invoked by a U.S. president in more than 30 years. 

"And I'd be allowed to do whatever I want," Mr. Trump added. "But we haven't chosen to do that because we're very well — we're doing very well without it. But I'd be allowed to do that, you understand that, and the courts wouldn't get involved, nobody would get involved, and I could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, I can send anybody I wanted. But I haven't done that because we're doing so well without it."

 

"We need political atheists"

 


Recently, a friend was asked, “What church do you go to?” to which he replied he was an atheist. I heard his response and was left contemplating what that means today and in this historical moment. What did his declaration have to do with what we were doing on Saturday mornings on a street in Washington, DC, educating and asking people to join the economic boycott against the Target corporation?  

Target was one of the first companies to announce a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiative after the police murder of George Floyd. Target, being a Minneapolis-based corporation, evidently felt that it had a special responsibility to lead the country in terms of addressing racial injustice.

This was until Donald Trump came to office. Target was one of the first companies to bend its knee at the altar of the wannabe emperor, Donald Trump. Trump’s attacks and demands on corporations and other entities to jettison DEI programs served as a litmus test of loyalty and patriotism. Nearly all of the other companies followed suit, prostrating themselves before the gods of greed and political accommodation.

This is how dictatorial regimes work. They invent ways to distinguish the “believers” from the “non-believers,” from the trusted versus those who cannot be trusted. Therefore, when my friend asserted boldly, proudly, and loudly that he was an atheist I was left to make a historical connection with what that meant in this heated political moment, and also what did that mean to me – a church person most of my life. “I am an atheist” he asserted, and that caused me to wonder what does that have to do with us boycotting Target these many months, and whether there was a historical correlation between what he was declaring and what we were doing?

After some time, I turned to my friend, reflecting upon the history of the term atheist, and I shared that the term atheist was used in the first century CE to label and castigate those who would not participate in emperor worship or the trappings of all of the other Roman gods and goddesses. An atheist was a person who did not worship Caesar.

The Caesars were generally deified, and the worship of Caesar and all of the Roman array of deities served as a test of loyalty. Those who fell into line and worshipped Caesar were loyal and patriotic, and those who resisted the test were seen as a threat. Early Christians were generally labelled atheists because they refused to worship the things of Caesar, and they typically resisted the Roman social order.

It is rumored that John who wrote the letter Revelation, not the John of the gospel, was exiled to the Isle of Patmos for his refusal to “Hail Caesar” or worship all of the other trappings of the Roman order. I reminded my friend that he was standing in a time and place where his declaration, “I am an atheist” could mean something more than the fact that he did not believe in God. 

Without him even knowing, he was declaring the same sentiments that was stated in the first century that separated the believers from the non-believers. The non-believers refused to accept the false gods, deities of human making, and the trapping of those gods for the sake of money, position, and power.

Given those historical facts, it made sense as to why we were on the street in front of a Target store, boycotting the business and urging others to do the same. We were doing historically what the atheists of the first century did, challenge the acquiescence to power and governments, and the business entities and people that have surrendered their dignity to satisfy the gluttonous appetite of a king. We have been demanding that Target and other corporations stop genuflecting at the throne of Caesar.

So, I was ecstatic over the “No Kings” rallies and marches held across the country. I could smell an aroma of political atheism in the crowds. The marches declared that in America there are “No Kings”, no Caesars, and no emperors. The marches confronted King Trump with the fact that people were not bowing or honoring the trappings of this Caesar-King. The marches across the country and in some cities overseas were a statement that, for this moment, some people were not bowing before this king.

But even with the celebrations of the number of people and cities responding to the “No Kings” sentiment, there were fears and perils that became apparent, at least for me. I began to worry about what would happen after the marches were over. What would happen after this administration is driven out and its power has faded?

Will people bow before a new king, one of their own? This is why we need seasoned and committed political atheists who will demand that we not be seduced into the courtyards of this king or any new king. Democracy is fragile and people can easily be fooled by the charms of charlatans.

We need political atheists with their cynicism to shock us by reminding us not to be seduced in any way or any season by any king. 

Without honest critique and cynicism coming from non-believers not seduced by the democrat/republican beauty contest, or the quixotic notions of an independent candidate we will find ourselves in this predicament again.

We need our political atheists who will sound the alarm of the dangers of a king lest we become beguiled and seduced again by the flash and form of a new snake-oil dealer. We will have to march and march, demonstrate and demonstrate to hold on to our country.

The demagogues and charlatans, like the people currently in the White House and Administration, as well as the would-be kings of our liking know how easily the country can be hijacked. The average American citizen is a cultural believer worshipping the myths of goodness and benevolence, believing that it will do the right thing if the right king is at the helm.

And, after the right person gets in, we can go back home and allow the “good” king to do the good things for us. We generally have placed our trust in the goodness of American institutions but glaring before us are the realities that Congress and the Supreme Court, as our protectors, may not be. 

We have seen just how Congress and the Supreme Court can also prostrate themselves at the altar of political expediency.

The political atheists, however, call us to be cynical, remain alert, remain in the streets, protest even when so-called “Good Kings” fill the so-called “Good Structures” of democracy, and to march on the king even when we like the king, but never again to prostrate ourselves before the throne of political satisfaction. To win the country back is a good thing, but to keep it is difficult, and so we need the sentiment of political atheists who refuse to bow and demand that we refuse also.

My friend made me appreciate the atheism that does not believe in doubt, that questions, and that does not fall into line. That is an essential political posture to have at all times. The Christians of the First Century were called atheists and were considered subversives because they did not salute the emperor or the emperor’s men, but pushed towards a higher order, and so must we. But this is our calling not only today as we challenge and resist Emperor Trump, but in all political seasons, and with all people aspiring to be king.

-CounterPunch, Graylan Scott Hagler is an advisor with FOR-USA and the founder and president of Faith Strategies USA. Until retiring from his position in 2022, Hagler was Senior Minister at Plymouth Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington, D.C.

 

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

"Scared of Crossing" Trump

 

      

Even as they acknowledged that only the public opposition of people in power would rein in President Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy and the rule of law, a number of political, military, business, and academic elites made clear Friday that they “are scared of crossing” the president.

In a column published on Friday in the Financial Times, Edmund Luce revealed that he has been talking with “dozens of figures, including lawmakers, private sector executives, retired senior military figures and intelligence chiefs, current and former Trump officials, Washington lawyers, and foreign government officials,” and he found that the vast majority asked to remain anonymous for fear of attacks from the president and his administration.

“Such is the fear of jail, bankruptcy, or professional reprisal, that most of these people insisted on anonymity,” Luce explained. “This was in spite of the fact that many of the same people also wanted to emphasize that Trump would only be restrained by powerful voices opposing him publicly.”

Trump’s revenge campaign against his foes has taken many forms, Luce found. The most high-profile examples have been instances in which the president has personally pushed for officials at the US Department of Justice to criminally indict many longtime adversaries, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, former FBI Director James Comey, and John Bolton, Trump’s own former national security adviser.

Luce also learned that the administration has been waging pressure campaigns on private employers to blacklist former Biden administration officials and other opponents from being offered jobs. “Every employer says something along the lines of ‘We’d love to hire you but it’s not worth the risk,’” one former Biden White House staffer told Luce. “All they offer me is apologies.”

Former Biden national security adviser Jake Sullivan, who is now a professor at Harvard University, told Luce that he spends much of his time “trying to help former colleagues find jobs” because so few employers are willing to chance angering the president.

Military officials who spoke with Luce expressed fears that the US armed forces will not resist Trump, as they did in his first term, were he to give them illegal orders. One retired four-star general said he worried that Dan Caine, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, would not refuse to carry out requests to have the military interfere with elections, as many officials did in 2020 when Trump tried to get the US Army to seize voting machines in swing states that he had lost to former President Joe Biden.

“Caine has the thinnest background to run the military at its most difficult stress test in modern history,” the general said.

Many Trump critics who read Luce’s reporting found it appalling that so many wealthy and powerful Americans were afraid to publicly criticize the president. “When all this is over, we need to have a pretty serious conversation about the utter moral failure of the elite of this country,” remarked Leah Greenberg, co-founder and co-executive director of Indivisible, on Bluesky.

Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth, said that Luce’s reporting shows “how much opposition we never see or hear because people fear reprisal” from the president.

Bradley Moss, a national security attorney who was one of Luce’s few sources willing to speak on the record, wrote on Bluesky that more elites needed to start speaking out against the president and his authoritarian ambitions. “I am disappointed in those who think keeping quiet will save them,” he said. “It will not.”

Ryan Enos, a political scientist at Harvard University, acknowledged the dangers outlined in Luce’s column but also pointed out reasons for hope. “This wannabe dictator is also extremely unpopular and those of us with the courage to stand up have the American people on our side,” he argued. “It’ll take courage and focus, but democracy can win.”

The elites interviewed by Luce expressed their reticence to publicly speak out against Trump days after more than 7 million people gathered at thousands of “No Kings” protests condemning the president’s authoritarian agenda—despite the administration’s threats against protest movements. 

Residents in cities including Portland, Oregon and Chicago have also resisted federal agents carrying out Trump’s mass detention and deportation campaign.

-Brad Reed, Common Dreams


Republicans refuse to do their jobs!

News reports tell us that “a growing number” of Republicans have “raised concerns” about Donald Trump’s unilaterally murdering suspected drug smugglers on the high seas. Meanwhile, a headline from The Hill announces: “GOP senators disconcerted by possible $230M Justice Department payout to Trump.”

There are so many things about which to be “disconcerted,” including unconscionable misuse of the military against Americans, brutal ICE raids, skyrocketing debt, corruption on a grand scale, and herky-jerky trade wars (complete with Trump’s temper tantrum over an ad accurately reminding us that Ronald Reagan opposed protectionism). One should further “raise concerns” that the Affordable Care Act premiums will “spike on average by 30 percent next year” for 17 million people, so that “along with the likely expiration of pandemic-era subsidies… millions of people will see their health insurance payments double or even triple in 2026,” as The Washington Post reports.

If only these fretful Republicans belonged to some sort of governmental body that had the ability to limit or even stop these troublesome actions. One could image, say, a separate legislative body to check the executive, control spending, and vet unfit nominees. But they want no part of that.

“Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to put the House on an indefinite hiatus that is now stretching into its second month while the government is shut down is the latest in a series of moves, he has made that have diminished the role of Congress and shrunken the speakership at a critical moment,” reports the New York Times

And Trump, in turn, recognizes he effectively is the speaker, as well as president. MAGA Republicans have happily consented to bulldozing the system of checks and balances with the same glee Trump has displayed leveling the East Wing—and with the same level of contempt for our democracy or its rules.

No one should find credible Republicans’ feigned angst over the unhinged machinations of an autocrat that they have refused to confront—or even complain about on the record. If Republicans were genuinely upset about the serial outrages (or at least more upset about those than incurring the wrath of the bully-in-chief), they would act like members of the legislative branch that the Constitution designed.

Many of Republicans professed “concerns” would subside if they, for example, come back to the Capitol to:

-Negotiate a compromise on the ACA subsidies.

-Pass a War Powers Act resolution and use the power of the purse to head off Trump’s unilateral war designs.

-Recapture the power of the purse, disallowing executive rescissions.

-Reclaim the tariff power and end the trade war that will cost global businesses $1.2T (mostly passed on to consumers).

-Conduct oversight hearings on the weaponization of the Justice Department (including bogus vindictive prosecutions of Trump enemies, cases that Americans by a wide margin think are unjustified).

-Hold Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt if she refuses to answer questions and continues to insult lawmakers.

-Launch an investigation into mismanagement of the Pentagon.

-Pass legislation that halts further White House desecration and bars spending any monies (private or public) on construction without congressional authorization. (Congress could also demand audit of the damage done and tally the cost to restore the historic White House. The next president can send the bill to Trump.)

-Bar any payment to Trump from the Justice Department until he leaves office.

-Start enforcing the Emoluments Clause, prohibiting foreigners’ gifts and “investments” in Trump businesses.

-Shutter ICE facilities unless and until the regime abides by the law to allow immediate access for oversight by lawmakers.

-Investigate Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s spending on two private jets and mismanagement of DHS.

-Release every scrap of paper concerning Jeffrey Epstein and those that participated in or enabled his rape of hundreds of children.

Well, you say, that will never happen. But all of it could happen under a Democratic Senate and House after the 2026 elections, should voters agree Republicans have failed spectacularly to do their jobs. 

A properly functioning Congress, just as the Framers intended, could stop many of Trump’s tyrannical executive’s outrages.

Republicans' brazen refusal to do their constitutionally assigned duties should compel voters to boot them out in 2026. Since they have shirked their duties and thereby enabled Trump’s corruption, malfeasance, and replete policy failures, what justification could there be to rehire them?

Perhaps if numbers such as $230M (Trump’s demand) or 3% (new inflation high) or $300M (cost of a garish ballroom) do not impress MAGA members of Congress, some others might:

-9%: the generic poll advantage for Democrats (50-41) for the 2026 midterms according to the Quinnipiac Poll

-15%: Congressional approval under the Gallup poll (and also the percentage by which Democrats have overperformed in 2025 races; if you are wondering, more than 40Republicans won their races by 15% or less in 2024).

-25%: Trump approval among Hispanic voters in the recent Associated Press-NORC-poll.(Republicans might have unwisely banked on high Hispanic support in Trump’s re-redistricting gambit.)

Put simply, if MAGA lawmakers are not moved by their oaths of office or the health and security of the American people, perhaps the prospect of a blue wave in 2026 will jolt them from their slumber. If Democrats perform strongly next week in elections in New Jersey, Virginia, Pennsylvania (state supreme court), and California (Prop. 50), Republicans might become “disconcerted” enough to take up their constitutional obligations.

The Contrarian is reader-supported. Please join our lively community and help us amplify independent journalism & litigate against the wreckage by becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 

Monday, October 27, 2025

Is Corruption the New American Dream — A Nation Rebuilt on the Gospel of the Grift?

 


When corruption becomes endemic, democracy dies from the inside out. Trump’s family’s grift is teaching America’s elites that power can be bought, just as it is in Putin’s Russia and Orbán’s Hungary, and it’s already distorting our economy.

When I was working for an international relief agency in the early 1980s, I went into Uganda during the war and famine that began when Tanzanian troops invaded to throw out Idi Amin. To get there, I had to pay a fifty-dollar bribe to the Ugandan official at their embassy in Nairobi to get my visa.

When I was leaving through the half-destroyed Entebbe airport, three soldiers pointed their automatic weapons at my face and demanded “half” of whatever money I had left before letting me through to the boarding area.

In Haiti, a cabinet-level official tried to solicit a $15,000 bribe from me in exchange for our agency getting permission to operate there (I turned it down). In a remote part of Mexico on a business trip, a police officer drove me off the road to demand $100 or else I’d “spend the night in jail.”

They were all quick, unforgettable lessons in how corruption works: when it becomes the default operating system of a country, it drains not only cash and makes it tough for honest businesspeople to earn a living, but — far more importantly — destroys democracy itself.

That same poison is now spreading here.

The corruption of Donald Trump and his children — the open solicitation of bribes disguised as “investments,” the jet plane, the crypto windfalls, the foreign hotel projects and “licensing fees,” the “donations” and “gifts” that appear tied to pardons, tariffs or regulatory relief — have begun to teach America’s morbidly rich and business leaders that access to our government is now a purchasable commodity.

Remember when Apple’s Tim Cook brought a chunk of 24 karat gold to gift Trump, apparently hoping for tariff exceptions? The long list of corporations that are paying for the Epstein Ballroom, presumably in expectation of better treatment from the Trump regime? The billions the UAE gave Trump’s kids just before Trump gave them chips they weren’t supposed to have because of national security? Tom Homan taking $50,000 in a paper bag from an FBI agent and Trump, Bondi, and Noem laughing it off?

Or headlines like today’s: “Close Friend of JD Vance Skirts Normal Channels to Take Over Key Health Research” and “$130M Pentagon Donor Has Ties to Jeffrey Epstein.”

Once that expectation of corruption takes hold, it reshapes an entire economy. It tells corporations, billionaires, and foreign governments alike that the fastest way to win contracts or avoid tariffs and other regulations isn’t through innovation or competition but through flattery, payment, or tribute to Donald, his wife, or his children.

This is exactly what happened in Trump’s role models of Russia and Hungary.

In Russia, researchers estimate roughly 15 to 20 percent of the nation’s entire GDP vanishes each year into the pockets of Putin, his oligarchs, and loyal politicians; some analysts put it even higher, approaching a quarter of the economy when you include the broader shadow sector.

In Hungary, corruption is smaller in absolute size but just as corrosive: public contracts are routinely overpriced by 20 percent or more, and a fifth of companies operate not on market principles but on loyalty to Viktor Orbán. The result is predictable: stagnant productivity, collapsing services, and a hollowed-out middle class as the Orbán family becomes fabulously rich.

Corruption functions like a tax, but one that never funds schools or bridges. It rewards obedience and punishes competence. Once leaders and their families start selling favors, the smart business move isn’t to innovate but to curry favor; the fastest path to profit is proximity to power.

Small businesses get crushed because they can’t afford the “entry fee.” Big ones stagnate because every decision runs through political connections. Ordinary people watch their roads crumble, their wages flatten, and their faith in fairness evaporate. The economy quietly re-optimizes itself around bribery instead of merit, and everyone — except the oligarchs — pays.

That’s where America is today. Trump has already normalized the spectacle of CEOs and foreign leaders making pilgrimages to the White House or Mar-a-Lago with million-dollar checks or lavish gifts. His family’s private ventures, from crypto to foreign hotels to golf resorts, are magnets for anyone seeking goodwill from the man with the power to sign their contracts or reduce their tariffs.

And with five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court having legalized unlimited political bribery of themselves and politicians through Buckley v. ValeoFirst National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, and Citizens United v. FEC, there’s barely a law left to stop it.

We’ve seen this movie before. In every kleptocracy, every dictatorship throughout history, the leader’s personal enrichment becomes national policy. Regulators are neutered, watchdogs are fired, and the press is bullied into silence through lawsuits, regulation, and oligarchic purchase.

Then come the strong-arm tactics: the intimidation of lawyers, journalists, and opponents under the guise of “law and order.” It’s what Putin did when Alexei Navalny exposed Gazprom’s graft and paid with his life; it’s what Orbán did when he had critics of his corruption prosecuted and bankrupted.

And now, here, attorneys defending protesters are being detained at airports while Trump suspends enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act so he, his billionaire buddies, and his family members can profit from foreign deals.

Corruption doesn’t just rot morality; it wrecks economies. When a nation’s leadership is for sale, domestic and foreign corporations start bidding instead of building.

Economists call it “state capture”: private interests rewriting the rules for their own benefit. Studies from the IMF and World Bank show that captured states lose growth, investment, and trust, while inequality soars. In Russia’s case, that loss adds up to hundreds of billions of dollars every year. In Hungary’s, GDP per capita has fallen far behind its once-equal neighbors.

The same dynamic is taking shape here as tax breaks, tariffs, and deregulation are auctioned off to the highest bidders.

For most Americans, this translates into worse schools, fewer jobs, and higher prices. Every time a corporation pays a bribe to secure a contract, it folds that “cost of doing business” into what you and I pay at the store or in taxes. Every time a billionaire buys a loophole or a pardon, the rest of us pick up the tab.

Meanwhile, the honest business owner who refuses to play along loses bids, the worker loses bargaining power, and democracy itself loses credibility. The economy becomes a closed club, guarded by money, loyalty, and fear.

Recovering from this kind of rot isn’t easy, but history shows it can be done.

Countries that have clawed their way back from systemic corruption did it by prosecuting openly corrupt leaders while making the sale of influence difficult and dangerous: forcing transparency in contracts, requiring officials to divest from private holdings, empowering independent prosecutors, protecting whistleblowers, and putting every government transaction online where citizens can see it.

The sunlight approach works because it raises the cost of corruption higher than its payoff.

That’s the crossroads we face now. We can follow Russia and Hungary down the path where 15 to 20 percent of national wealth disappears into private hands each year, or we can defend the idea that government exists to serve the public, not enrich the Trump dynasty.

If we fail, America will cease to be a democracy in any meaningful sense. We’ll become a market; one where laws, tariffs, and justice are just products to be bought and sold by those with the closest access to Trump or his family members.

I’ve seen what that world looks like up closely, staring down the barrel of a soldier’s rifle at Entebbe Airport. The stakes aren’t abstract. Corruption is the moment when fear replaces fairness, when power replaces principle, and when Americans become “customers” of their own government instead of citizens.

If we let Trump and his circle finish that transformation, America won’t just resemble Putin’s Russia, it will have become just another tinpot dictatorship with a fabulously rich “royal” entourage and a vast class of the struggling, working poor who can’t afford to spiff the First Family.

-Thom Hartmann



"Evil, Fascist, Wannabe Authoritarian" Stephen Miller Threatens IL Gov. Pritzker with Arrest

 


Just over nine months after President Donald Trump returned to office and pardoned his supporters who stormed the US Capitol, one of the Republican’s top aides suggested that federal law enforcement may arrest Democrats standing up to the White House’s anti-migrant agenda, including Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker.

Asked about the administration’s willingness and federal authority to arrest the Illinois leader on Fox News Friday, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, responded: “Well, the answer I’m about to give doesn’t only apply to Gov. Pritzker, it applies to any state official, any local official, anybody who’s operating in an official capacity who conspires or engages in activity that unlawfully impedes federal law enforcement conducting their duties.”

 

Pritzker Warns Trump Will Have Military Seize Ballot Boxes So He Can 'Count the Votes Himself' in Elections

Pritzker Warns Trump Will Have Military Seize Ballot Boxes So He Can ‘Count the Votes Himself’ in Elections


‘We’re Not Going to Forget’: Pritzker Warns Trump Enforcers Miller, Homan, Bovino That Immunity Not Forever

“So if you engage in a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws or to unlawfully order your own police officers or your own officials to try to interfere with ICE officers, or even to arrest ICE officers, you’re engaged in criminal activity,” he said, referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Different types of crimes would apply. There is obstruction of justice. There is harboring illegal aliens. There is impeding the enforcement of our immigration laws.”

“And then, as you get up the scale of behavior, you obviously get into seditious conspiracy charges, depending on the conduct, and many other offenses. So again, it depends on the action. It depends on the conduct. It depends on what is taking place,” Miller continued. He went on to tell ICE officers that “you have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties.”

Both Miller’s threat toward Pritzker and other officials, and his immunity claim, were met with swift backlash, including from Zeteo‘s Mehdi Hasan, who highlighted Trump’s pardons for the January 6, 2021 insurrectionists.

“Remember, these fascist freaks pardoned the actual people convicted of ’seditious conspiracy’ while falsely accusing their opponents of this serious crime,” the journalist wrote on social media. “(On a side note, arresting Pritzker would make him the most popular politician in America overnight.)”

Trump himself has called for jailing Pritzker and Democratic Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson “for failing to protect” ICE officers. Priztker, a billionaire and potential 2028 presidential candidate, has suggested Trump should be removed from office via the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Miles Taylor, who served as Department of Homeland Security chief of staff during the first Trump administration and authored an infamous, anonymous 2018 New York Times editorialsaid Friday, “Feels like we’re going down the rabbit hole pretty fast here, folks.”

California state Sen. Scott Weiner (D-11), one of the Democrats running for former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s seat in the next cycle, said: “They’re now explicitly taking the position that state and local elected officials are committing crimes when they attempt to protect their communities from the ICE secret police.”

Weiner‘s state Senate district includes San Francisco, one of the cities targeted by Trump with immigration agents, and a potential National Guard deployment. The president said he backed off the threat to send troops to the city, for now, after calls from billionaire friends.

However, Trump’s administration is still fighting in federal court to deploy the National Guard in the Chicagoland area, where ICE’s Operation Midway Blitz is underway. The people of Illinois have responded with persistent protests, including at an ICE facility in suburban Broadview, where agents have met demonstrations with violence.

“No, ICE officers do not have immunity to assault and arrest unarmed Americans without a warrant,” former Obama administration official and Pod Save America co-host Jon Favreau stressed on social media Friday.

Tufts University international politics professor Daniel Drezner similarly said, “This seems very disturbing and also wrong.”

Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) concluded: “Stephen Miller is the most evil, fascist, wannabe authoritarian in the Trump regime. And that’s saying something.”

Miller’s comments came just two days after Pritzker appeared on Fox News and discussed Trump’s attacks on him, immigration agents’ actions in Illinois, and the risk that Trump may try to use US troops to steal future elections.

The governor’s deputy chief of staff for communications, Matt Hill, responded to Miller’s remarks by pointing to that appearance.

“Holy crap. Gov. Pritzker did ONE interview on Fox, and Stephen Miller is freaking out,” Hill said on social media with a snowflake emoji. “All the Gov. did was appoint experts to collect videos and testimony of what’s happening in Chicago. Now, Miller is threatening to silence Illinoisans and arrest their governor.”

-Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams