Often,
when prosecutors dismiss criminal cases that have been indicted, it’s because
they’ve learned a defendant is actually innocent or at least discovered they do
not have sufficient evidence to prove guilt. That is not the case here. Special
Counsel Jack Smith wrote that his view of the merits of his case—in other
words, his ability to obtain and sustain convictions against Donald Trump, has
not changed.
Trump
outran the justice system by winning the election. It is DOJ policy, not a lack
of evidence, that compelled Smith to move to dismiss the cases. That is no
small thing. Trump won’t face juries in these cases. But that does not mean
Trump can claim he has been exonerated. He has not been. Full stop.
Smith
will write a report and it’s extremely likely it will be public. How fulsome it
will be and what it reveals remains to be seen. The question is whether it will
make a difference in some meaningful way in the future.
I
continue to think it will. We have lived through one of the most difficult
months our democracy has endured. But our democracy has endured. We don’t get
to quit just because it isn’t easy. Sometimes, you give it your all and it
still doesn’t go your way. But if you believe the Constitution and the rule of
law mean something, mean a better way of life for us and our children—and I
do—then you can’t just give up and walk away. You have to keep going.
So
even as I’m getting ready to spend the rest of the week with friends and
family, I’m thinking about what we are going to do, how we are going to be
prepared to do the big things and the small things necessary to prevent Donald
Trump from controlling our futures. We will have work to do.
Trump
has threatened to fire and prosecute investigators and prosecutors who followed
the law, took their evidence to a grand jury, obtained indictments, and
proceeded against him, while providing him with every measure of due process.
His Attorney General nominee Pam Bondi said in August of 2023 that when Trump returned to
office, “the prosecutors will be prosecuted — the bad ones — the investigators
will be investigated.”
That’s
unconscionable for a person who aspires to be the country’s top law enforcement
officer. Bondi, unless she changes her tune, and that seems unlikely since she
Donald Trump’s pick, is pre-committed to using the Justice Department as a
political tool to please a president.
But
that’s easier said than done. Former FBI acting Director Andrew McCabe won his lawsuit against the Trump
Administration after he was wrongfully fired. And it’s easy to see how efforts
like this could backfire.
If
Trump’s DOJ goes after Smith’s team, claiming their prosecutions were
political, the ensuing litigation would almost certainly reveal the full scope
of the Special Counsel’s office investigation and the evidence that was
compiled against Donald Trump and others.
Defending
themselves against claims their prosecution wasn’t legitimate would necessarily
call for a full account of the investigation and the basis for prosecutors’
decision to indict. Trump should remember that old adage: Be careful what you
ask for.
There
is much more to come. I’m not giving up, and I hope you won’t either. We’re in
this together,
-Joyce
Vance
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.