The Food and Drug Administration granted approval Tuesday
to a closely watched Alzheimer’s drug, concluding that the benefits of modestly
slowing the progression of the devastating disease outweigh its risks,
drugmaker Eli Lilly announced.
The agency, in a surprise move in March, had delayed
approval of the drug to further scrutinize its safety and effectiveness. Last
month, a panel of independent experts unanimously
endorsed the drug, setting the stage for the FDA’s sign-off.
Eli Lilly’s drug —
Kisunla, the brand name for donanemab — is one of the few treatments developed
for Alzheimer’s that modifies the underlying disease and will join just one
other drug, Leqembi, on the commercial market. Kisunla — which was approved for
treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease — doesn’t halt the disease,
but it has been shown to slow cognitive and functional decline.
“I think it’s likely to be the highlight of the year for us,” said Daniel Skovronsky, Eli Lilly’s chief scientific officer, noting that there are “few diseases that are as feared with as few treatment options” as Alzheimer’s. He said Kisunla will be available to patients in the coming weeks. The debates over such drugs have been particularly fraught because there is no cure for the affliction affecting more than 6 million Americans.
The total cost of Kisunla will vary by patient
depending on when they complete the treatment. That’s because once a scan shows
a patient has minimal levels of amyloid, they can discontinue the treatment.
The estimated cost for a six-month course of the
therapy is $12,522. A full year of
treatment is protected to cost $32,000, according to the drugmaker. However,
many people probably will not pay the
full list price in part since
Medicare is expected to cover the treatment for certain
patients.
For some, the price could be higher than Leqembi’s estimated cost of $26,500 per year, although that treatment does not stop after the amyloid clears. Kisunla is the third amyloid-targeting drug to win the FDA’s blessing since 2021, following two treatments — Aduhelm and Leqembi — jointly developed by drugmakers Eisai and Biogen.
The approval of Aduhelm deeply divided the medical
community, as critics argued that
there was not enough
evidence to show that the drug worked. The drugmakers stopped marketing Aduhelm
after it fizzled commercially. But Leqembi received a warmer
reception because later-stage
data showed the treatment slowed cognitive and functional decline by 27 percent
over 18 months, while Aduhelm had
conflicting data.
Still, like the anti-amyloid drugs that came before
it, donanemab has not been free of controversy. Three patients who received the
drug in a clinical trial died of a complication from the drug. The condition,
called ARIA, can cause the brain to swell or bleed. No such deaths occurred in
the placebo group.
Critics have also said that donanemab’s benefits,
while statistically significant, are modest.
Members of the advisory committee cautioned that the risks and benefits could
vary depending on patients’ genetics and the stage of their disease.
In briefing documents last month, the FDA had signaled
that it was not overly alarmed by the drug’s safety profile, writing that the
findings “are generally consistent” with the class of drugs that aim to reduce
or eliminate amyloid plaques.
Though far from a cure, the recent Alzheimer’s drugs
have kindled excitement among some researchers and advocates because of the
potential to modify the course of the disease — effectively buying more time
for those who suffer from it.
“Having multiple
treatment options is the kind of advancement we’ve all been waiting for — all
of us who have been touched, even blindsided, by this difficult and devastating
disease,” Joanne Pike, head of the Alzheimer’s Association, said in a statement.
The drug is administered by infusion once a month. A
key feature of Eli Lilly’s approach is that treatment with the drug could be
discontinued once a patient’s amyloid levels are reduced to a certain level.
That could reduce the burden on patients, but it remains unclear how testing
for amyloid should be conducted.
The approval isn’t likely to give a meaningful boost
to Lilly’s profits in the near term.The Indianapolis-based firm has a
stock-market value of nearly $820 billion — the eighth-highest among publicly
traded U.S. companies, and the most of any pharmaceutical firm, according to
S&P Global Market Intelligence. The company’s rising stock price has
largely been driven by the runaway success of
its diabetes and weight-loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound, respectively.
Still, the approval
marks a significant success for Lilly and could buoy the prospects of other
amyloid-targeting drugs, according to Wall Street analysts.
-The Washington Post
Rachel Roubein is a national health-care reporter for The Washington Post and author of The Health 202 newsletter, a daily morning tipsheet focused on health policy and politics. Twitter
Daniel Gilbert joined The Washington Post in 2022 and
writes about the business of medicine. He previously spent seven years as an
investigative reporter for the Seattle Times, and before that covered business
and energy for the Wall Street Journal. Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.