“At the direction of President Vladimir Putin,
Russia has committed staggering acts of
aggression against Ukraine. Its invasion is brazened in
substance and style. Russia is threatening to overthrow the government in Kyiv.
It seems to flaunt the flimsiness of its pretexts. Though always thuggish,
Putin once seemed averse to risk. Now he has taken a world-shaking gamble whose
ultimate implications neither he nor anyone else can foresee.
“For Americans, this is a
dangerous moment, and a disorienting one. The United States has spent much of
the past three decades dealing with powers much weaker than itself. Even so, it
has learned painful lessons
about the limits of its own power and its capacity to do harm
as well as good. These lessons may be difficult to recall in the face of
Russia’s deplorable and ongoing attack. But they have become only more
important now, as the United States confronts a great power and nuclear peer capable
of inflicting damage well beyond Ukraine.
“Months ago, US President Joe Biden took the
use of force in Ukraine off the table.
Still, a nonmilitary confrontation between the United States and Russia likely
poses greater risks to the safety and well-being of the American public than
did even the recent wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, in which the United
States was a direct military participant.
“Over the last two days, the United States,
its European allies, the UK, and Australia, announced severe sanctions against
the Russian government, banks, and individuals, with more punishments to come.
These measures, stronger than many expected, amount to warfare by economic
means, and they will effectively be permanent.
“In recent decades, the United
States has imposed crippling sanctions on relatively small states like Cuba,
Iran, and North Korea, incurring little cost to the US economy. Russia, by
contrast, is a great power and may retaliate in
kind, sending oil, gas, and food prices higher.
“It could mount cyber-attacks that spur cycles
of retaliation. In the worst case, conflict could escalate into a hot war. What
is particularly challenging is that no number of sanctions would likely stop
Russian aggression in Ukraine, and there is no obvious threshold by which
American and European leaders can feel satisfied that they have done enough.
The demand to “do more” will persist no matter how much policymakers in fact
do.
“So, the desire to punish Russia,
however justified, will need to be tempered by two considerations: What are the
costs and risks of retaliation? And how likely are additional sanctions to
change Russian behaviour for the better, given the alternative possibilities
that they may strengthen Putin’s grip on the Russian economy, make him more
desperate and reckless, or drive Russia and China closer
together?
“An exclusively punitive outlook
could also inhibit America’s handling of the conflict in Ukraine itself. Even
before Russia launched its attack, influential figures proposed
that the United States should arm a prospective Ukrainian insurgency, imagining
that Ukraine could become ‘Russia’s Afghanistan.’ Military aid should be
considered, but not before it becomes clearer what kind of operation Russia is
mounting, who would receive US support, and what battlefield objective could be
pursued.
“In Syria, the United States trained and
equipped rebel forces, only to lengthen the war without dislodging dictator and
President Bashar al-Assad from power. America’s experience
in Afghanistan makes for a curious model to emulate. In the
1980s, the United States aided the forces from which al-Qaeda would emerge. For
the past two decades, it created a client state dependent on US support and
continual violence. If Putin has launched a reckless, poorly calculated
military adventure, the United States should hardly follow suit.
“For too long, the United States
has ranked the impulse to stop evil above the imperative to help those in need.
Let this time be different. The United States, despite having limited military
options at its disposal, has every ability to assist Ukrainians who flee for
their lives. The Biden administration should welcome those who seek to resettle
in the United States.
“It should press European allies to do the
same and mobilise US agencies to help them. “We must have courage and
self-confidence to cling to our own methods and conceptions of human society”,
diplomat George Kennan cabled from
Moscow in 1946. Kennan was writing at the start of the Cold War. It is advice
to heed at what may be the start of another.”
Stephen Wertheim is
a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
and the author of Tomorrow, the World:
The Birth of U.S. Global Supremacy. An earlier version of this
article was published by the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace.
From ABC
Politics & Religion
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.