In the U.S.,
white evangelical Christianity and conservative politics have merged in an
unholy symbiosis, and they’ve both been transformed. The Republican Party has
become a vehicle for white supremacy in the guise of religious privilege, while
at the same time, evangelicalism has been transmuted into an Ayn Rand gospel
which denies that we have any moral obligations to each other.
To distract
from real issues of justice, the devotees of this right-wing religion are
stirring up fear of imaginary boogeymen, like “wokeness”. This term originally
signified awareness of racial-justice issues, but – like “political
correctness” in the 90s – it’s become a meaningless snarl word for anything and
everything that conservatives hate. Another of these right-wing scarecrows is
“cancel culture”, which has come to stand for the idea that anyone should face
any consequences for expressing abhorrent opinions.
All these
trends are on display in a tweet from Erick Erickson, the right-wing pundit and
former CEO of RedState:
First of all:
The word Erickson wants here is “soteriology“, which is
defined as “the branch of theology dealing with salvation”, not “eschatology“, which is
the theology of the end times, the apocalypse, and the final judgment.
Second: The
idea that “wokeness” and “cancel culture” demand that dissenters be silenced,
whereas Christians – by implicit contrast – respect the free speech of those
they disagree with… this is sheer historical illiteracy. Christianity’s record
on free speech is a long, tattered, bloodstained scroll. Over the centuries of
its existence, it’s suppressed competing viewpoints on a far larger scale and
more brutally than anything ever attempted by secularists.
Has Erickson
heard of the Inquisition? Blasphemy laws? Bans and burnings of heretical
literature? State constitutions that bar atheists from holding office?
The Comstock
Law?
Christian bluenoses demanding that books which offend them be removed
from libraries? Christian colleges that require
students and professors to affirm lengthy doctrinal statements and
forbid unapproved books, unapproved music, and unapproved student clubs?
But the third
thing I have to point out, and the real reason I wanted to write this post, is
this short but telling phrase:
Christian
eschatology says you gain your salvation through a direct relationship with
Christ, regardless of others… The only thing this can mean is that
Christianity – at least in Erickson’s vision – is a religion for people who
care only about themselves. All you have to do is say the
magic words, and you’ve fulfilled the requirements that God set out. Securing
your salvation is a solely individual matter and requires no consideration or
concern for other people.
In fact, to
judge from his phrasing, you should distrust anyone who claims
that religion asks anything more of you. Anyone who tells you that you have a
duty to repair injustice, to overthrow oppressive systems, to help the poor and
downtrodden, to show generosity to the needy, to welcome the stranger, to
expose the mighty who’ve abused their power… all those ideas are “woke”,
anti-Christian, and to be rejected.
If it were
only Erickson who thought this way, I wouldn’t have bothered to write this
post. But this ideology isn’t just increasingly common, it’s the dominant
strain of thought among the religious right.
For
instance, this
site (which
attacks “social justice”, another conservative boogeyman) says, “The biblical
exhortations to care for the poor are more individual than societal.” This
site adds
that the only legitimate role of a pastor is to preach “individual sin and
salvation” rather than to criticize “supposedly structural racism”.
Now, you
could say – and I
have –
that the Bible itself refutes this idea. In passages like Matthew chapter 25,
the Parable of the Sheep and Goats, Jesus states that helping others isn’t an
optional extra but a requirement for salvation (“as you did it to one of the
least of these my brethren, you did it to me”). Another famous passage, from
James chapter 2, says that faith without good works has no power to save
anyone.
However,
Christianity the belief system can’t be separated from those who practice it.
Even if the Bible were the best book ever written, if millions of people have
cited it as justification for acts of horror and bloodshed, we’d logically have
to conclude that the Bible promotes evil. It would be absurd to argue that we
should ignore the belief system as it’s actually practiced in favor of some
purely theoretical version.
Although the
modern religious right has propagated this antisocial gospel, they didn’t
invent it. It’s an ancient and ugly idea making a comeback. For centuries, it
was the creed of slavery.
For obvious
reasons, the Christian slave owners of the antebellum era preached that
Christianity tells us how to get to heaven, but says nothing about conditions
in this world. They taught, as many Christians through history have taught,
that this life is just a brief blip before another existence of infinitely
greater importance. Salvation is the only thing that matters, and therefore
suffering and injustice should be endured, not resisted. (And, to be fair, the
Bible supports
this idea as
well.)
This idea
survived the destruction of slavery, and it’s been used ever since to defend
bigotry, plutocracy, and unjust hierarchy. Even if white male evangelicals have
all the power and all the wealth, that’s unimportant in the grand scheme of
things. The poor and the meek should keep their heads down, concentrate only on
their own souls, and accept the world as it is without seeking to change it.
Fortunately,
it’s not hard to recognize this self-serving propaganda for what it is. It’s a
last-ditch effort to defend privilege by those who have no better argument than
the naked assertion of “God said so.” Nonbelievers and progressive religious
people both have solid grounds to reject this idea, and we can both agree that
real justice requires a transformation of society, not just of individuals.
-Adam Lee,
Patheos
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.