“…The detention camps weren’t enough. The policy of deliberate child torture was
insufficient. The neglect of Americans displaced by natural disasters didn’t pass muster. The hush money shelled out to the president’s
former mistresses in violation of federal law was too small a crime. The president using his
office to enrich himself wasn’t
sufficient. Deflecting blame from a foreign government’s effort to elect the
president while seeking financial gain from that government, and then
attempting to obstruct the investigation, was deemed too complicated to pursue.
“But when the president
attempted to use his authority to extort a foreign leader into implicating one
of his political rivals, a former vice president and longtime Democratic
senator, in criminal activity, the leadership of the Democratic Party seemed to
suddenly recognize what it was facing. Millions of Americans wake
up every day worried that Donald Trump’s actions will hurt someone they love,
but until he used his authority to go after someone beloved by the Democratic
establishment, party leaders didn’t quite grasp the urgency. If Trump could do
this to Joe Biden, after all, he could do it to any of them. That’s often how
it works in a democracy: People do the right thing for self-interested reasons.
“In
fairness to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the events that moved her to support impeachment after months of dismissing the left wing of her
caucus are exactly what the Framers had in mind when they crafted the
impeachment clause, which was to prevent a corrupt chief executive from using
his official powers to keep himself in office. That precisely describes Trump’s
use of his official powers to strong-arm a foreign government into implicating
his political rivals. The Framers forced the chief executive to face election
every four years in order to prevent the president from becoming a king, but they
recognized that a corrupt president might use his powers to keep himself in
office in perpetuity, and that impeachment was needed as a last resort. Yet
Trump is only the most vulgar expression of the anti-democratic streak
spreading in the Republican Party, and the forces that propelled his candidacy
are the same ones that may shield him from accountability...
“[T]his not only amounts to an act of extortion by the
president, but turns hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into the payoff
for a bribe designed to compel a foreign power to criminalize a political
rival.
“Democrats should now realize
that it does not matter whom they run against Trump. He will seek to discredit
any opponent not through campaigning, but through the corrupt abuse of his
official powers. The fact that Justice Department prosecutors saw no ‘thing of value’ being exchanged with Ukraine that could provide a predicate
for criminal prosecution, that it helped suppress the whistle-blower report, and that Barr—at least in the president’s mind—would be a
party to a corrupt scheme to damage a political opponent suggest that federal
law enforcement will not stand in the way when the time comes...
“This is one reason that
perceptions among Democrats shifted so fast. In a republic, the people are
sovereign. The president used his authority to criminalize or suppress his
political rivals, in violation of the people’s right to choose their
leadership. His acts exemplify the scenario the Framers feared when they
contemplated a corrupt president using executive power to keep himself in
office, unaccountable to the people who elected him. Trump’s conduct here is
not just impeachable; it is why the impeachment clause exists.
“What the Framers may not have
contemplated, however, is the extent to which a demagogue is capable of
convincing his supporters that the president and the people are one and the
same, and therefore, the president is incapable of betraying the people,
because he is their purest expression made flesh. Trump is but a crass
distillation of this anti-democratic idea, but if it were not deeply rooted in
the Republican Party, he could never have ascended to its leadership.
“Already, Republicans have
sought to dismiss Trump’s explicit attempt to extort a foreign leader into
criminalizing a political rival by denying that the summary of the call shows
what it shows. Republican legislators believe there is nothing the president
could do to lose the support of the people who put them in office, and so there
is no political benefit to acknowledging his misconduct, even though they would
immediately demand the impeachment or resignation of any Democratic president
who did the same thing. In the 1990s, Republicans impeached Bill Clinton over
his false denials of sexual impropriety; they would not hesitate to impeach a
Democratic president who withheld foreign aid to extract a smear of his
Republican rivals.
“But behind this unfailing
submission to Trump also lie more troubling influences. As the parties have
become more racially polarized, and the Republican Party has become more
exclusively white and Christian, Republicans have begun to think of themselves
as the only genuinely legitimate actors in the polity. This is why Republicans
draw districts that hand them more offices even when they fail to win a majority of the votes; it is why Republican legislatures strip Democratic executives of their powers when the electorate foils their efforts
to rig elections in their favor; it is why the Trump administration attempted
a fraudulent scheme to use the census to diminish the influence of minority voters relative
to white voters; it is why Republicans seek to pass laws intended to suppress minority votes; it is why every night on Fox News, viewers hear one
host after another outline deranged conspiracies about how Democrats want to steal America from its
rightful white owners through demographic change.
“Attempts to strip minorities
of their rightful place in the polity are a bipartisan American tradition. They
emerge whenever one party becomes beholden to an ethnically diverse
constituency, and the other answers almost exclusively to white Christians. The
contest between the universalist principles espoused by the Founders and their
sectarian application in practice has been the principal conflict of American
democracy since the beginning.
“The peaceful transition of
power is fundamental to democracy, but many Republicans have concluded that it
is not possible for that to occur legitimately. Without such transitions,
democracy is a dead letter. But if your political enemies are inherently
illegitimate, then depriving them of power by any means necessary is not
effacing democracy; it is defending it. The southern Democrats who stripped
black Americans of the franchise at the end of Reconstruction using a battery
of literacy tests, property requirements, poll taxes, and grandfather clauses
saw themselves not as crippling democracy but as strengthening it, by limiting
the ballot to those who were worthy of participating.
“The Republican belief that
their opposition is inherently illegitimate is one reason it does not matter to
many Republicans that Trump’s allegations that Biden sought to get a Ukrainian
prosecutor fired to prevent his son from being investigated are baseless...
“Attempting to use one’s
official powers for private gain is the most basic definition of corruption.
Yet because the base of the Republican Party believes itself to be the only
legitimate expression of popular will, whether or not its members constitute an
actual majority of the electorate, it does not matter what Trump’s motives are.
Much of the Republican base believes, as Trump does, that loyalty to the
country and loyalty to himself are one and the same. Therefore, nothing Trump
could do is corrupt, and even using his official powers for personal gain is an
act of selfless patriotism. In this warped view, attempting to extort foreign
countries into attacking his political rivals is not a betrayal of his
responsibilities as president; it is the fullest expression of them.
“Unless Republican support for
Trump craters, Republican legislators will not turn against him. And Republican
support for Trump cannot crater as long as many Republicans view their
political rivals as illegitimate political actors rather than fellow citizens.
“This is daunting, but it makes
the Democratic leadership’s decision to commit to an impeachment inquiry all
the more vital. Democrats may not prevail in removing Trump through
impeachment, or by the ballot. But democracy cannot function as a single-party
institution in which the authority of the state is a mere instrument for one
faction to maintain power in perpetuity. Legislators have a moral obligation,
outlined by the Framers themselves, to protect American democracy from such an
assault. They may fail, but failing to try would be an unforgivable disgrace.”
Serwer,
Adam. “Why Republicans Aren't
Turning on Trump: The Framers underestimated the extent to which a demagogue
might convince his supporters that the president and the people are one and the same.” TheAtlantic.Com 26 Sept. 2019. 28 Sept. 2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.