Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Have you seen Michael Connelly’s legislative survey for Illinois' 21st district?



I received Connelly’s “What’s your opinion on the issues facing Illinois” yesterday. I thought about what is more important to a sycophantic politician like Connelly who asks loaded questions such as “Should government pensions move to a defined-contribution plan, which are like pensions used in private business, instead of the current defined-benefit plan system” and “Teacher pensions make up the largest portion of the public pension funds. Some think teacher pensions should be shifted from the state to local school districts to make them accountable for hiring and pay hikes. Others say this will result in higher property taxes without reforming the system. Should Illinois shift responsibility for some pension payments to school districts? Yes, No, Undecided?”

Politicians like Connelly do not concern themselves with the examination of evidence, the causes of the state’s financial problems, and the best solutions for these complicated issues. They are concerned about their reputation and re-election and about maintaining their power and influence. They like simple surveys that ask their constituents to make simple choices to complex questions, questions that are constructed so they are not comprehensive and that demand no relevant and accurate scrutiny in order to answer intelligently.

Connelly’s legislative survey is a distortion based on his unwillingness to survey fairly the real “issues facing Illinois”: pension debt and revenue problems that were caused by incompetent, irresponsible and corrupt leadership. Instead, Connelly casts the issues of raising crucial state revenue and public employees’ pensions as objects of his bias to provoke mindless, hair-trigger responses.

How about asking constituents whether the State of Illinois ought to keep a promise (as a rule of prima facie duty), and whether a politician can break a constitutional contract with ANY citizen in Illinois if it suits a politician’s advantage? How about asking whether a politician should continue to hurt the lives of people who were not responsible for the state’s pension debt and lack of revenue? How about asking whether so-called pension reform, or the breaking of a constitutionally-guaranteed contract, is a good thing, and whether it is legally and morally right to ignore the State and U.S. Constitutions?

Illinois Pension Reform Is Without Legal and Moral Justification, Mr. Connelly. You know past state governments created the severe unfunded liability for the five public employees’ retirement systems in Illinois. Your attempt to isolate and offer up one group of people for hardship and, for many of these public employees, create a dispossession by way of intentionally-diminishing laws while you perpetuate special exceptions and windfalls for the wealthy elite is a mockery of justice.

Public employees’ benefits and rights are guaranteed by contract. It is critical that today’s politicians protect legitimate expectations and concerns for all the state’s citizenry, especially for people who must be defended against those with excessive economic clout and inequitable schemes to pass prejudicial legislation that benefit the financial elite (and their politicians) at the expense of everyone else.

To ignore the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and change laws that protect one group of people is to ignore due process and equal protection of the laws that guarantee contractual agreements. It is shameful that politicians (like you) are willing to renege on a contract when (you and) they are the debtors. It is wrong to modify public employees’ contractual rights and benefits prospectively and retroactively when there are other ways to address the pension debt problem, such as through debt and revenue restructuring.

Legal and moral sense dictates that you and the rest of the Illinois General Assembly must align with the U.S. and State Constitutions and sanction the vested rights of its middle-class public employees. Politicians should understand the economic, social and psychological harm that will be done to this significant body of voters, of which there are approximately 693,000 members, when they break a contract. It is a matter of moral and legal concern for EVERY citizen of Illinois to pay attention to any proposed violations of rights and benefits.  

-Glen Brown


11 comments:

  1. Would this be the same legislator who conveniently forgot to deliver a petition signed by over 5000 concerned citizens to leader of the Illinois Senate in which they respectfully urged Senator Cullerton to use his political will and wisdom to find an appropriate solution to the underfunding caused by years of theft of the public pensions by the General Assembly? The one he promised he'd take?

    Is this a survey you'd trust for real answers?

    Yes, No, Undecided?

    Is this a Senator you'd trust again after he used Steve Martin's infamous excuse, "I forgot"?

    Yes, No, Undecided?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Failing to deliver signed petitions to a State Legislative Committee must be illegal. How do we begin the process of prosecution??

    ReplyDelete
  3. John Dillon and I delivered the petition to Cullerton's office. The link for the petition is still live, however: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/illinois-revenue-and?source=c.em.cp&r_by=1130041

    ReplyDelete
  4. According to Patricia Herrmann:

    “Senator Connelly is a toady to ALEC and is still promoting the Laffer curve, at least according to a previous newsletter. He is still promoting Reaganonomics and never noticing that tax cuts never resulted in a trickle down to ordinary people. There is more income inequality than ever.

    “When the economy melted down, ALEC used that as an excuse to take away money from old people. Take away the earned delayed wages of teachers and other public employees. As their toady Connelly is shameless.”

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is Michael Connelly part of the conversation about arming Naperville D/203 teachers? (I just read this in the Tribune yesterday--Page 3). His name wasn't mentioned, but curious to know where he stands on this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not know; however, he sponsored SB 1763 which would "amend the General Assembly Article of the Illinois Pension Code. Requires active Tier 1 employees to elect either to (i) have automatic annual increases in retirement annuity and survivor's annuity delayed and reduced or (ii) maintain the current benefit package with additional limitations on pensionable salary..."

      Delete
    2. He also sponsored SR 1590: "States the belief that the Illinois Constitution should not be amended to permit a graduated income tax."

      Delete
    3. He also sponsored SB 2173: "Amends the General Assembly, State Employee, State Universities, Downstate Teacher, and Chicago Teacher Articles of the Illinois Pension Code. Requires active Tier 1 employees to elect either to (i) have automatic annual increases in retirement and survivor's annuities delayed and reduced or (ii) maintain their current benefit package with additional limitations on pensionable salary. Provides that a Tier 1 employee who elects item (i) is entitled to have future increases in income treated as pensionable income, have contributions reduced to a specified rate, and receive a consideration payment of 10% of contributions made prior to the election. Provides that a Tier 1 employee who elects item (ii) is not eligible to have future increases in income treated as pensionable income. Makes funding changes..."

      Delete
  6. Let us not forget that the following politicians are avaricious and unethical; that they voted to diminish and impair public employees' and retirees' guaranteed constitutional pensions.

    There were 30 YES Votes for breaking a constitutionally-guaranteed contract with public employees and retirees (Senate Bill 1) in the Senate:

    Althoff
    Biss
    Brady
    Connelly
    Cullerton, J
    Cunningham
    Harmon
    Hunter
    Jacobs
    Jones
    Kotowski
    Lahood
    Landek
    Martinez
    McConnaughay
    McGuire
    Morrison
    Mulroe
    Munoz
    Murphy
    Oberweis
    Radogno
    Raoul
    Rezin
    Sandoval
    Silverstein
    Stadelman
    Steans
    Syverson
    Van Pelt

    ReplyDelete
  7. From Patricia Herrmann:

    “Connelly was a sponsor of an ALEC bill calling for ‘scholarships’; i.e., vouchers to private schools a couple years ago. I believe his parents are teachers (can’t remember exactly). I was shocked IEA and IRTA endorsed him. I was at the meeting he held with Wehrli in Naperville where he was backing Rauner’s Turnaround Agenda. Slime ball.”

    Pat

    ReplyDelete
  8. How could the IRTA support Connelly and Harmon?

    From Marjorie Sucansky:

    Glen,

    "Connelly was at the DuPage Unit luncheon last week and obfuscated when asked if he would support an amendment to the Illinois Constitution that would destroy our protection. I asked our PAC man why Connelly was endorsed rather than his opponent who also answered the questions on the questionnaire in our favor. I am going to forward your question to Jim Bachman and Mike Wierzbicki and let them answer your questions."

    Marge

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.