State Senator Heather Steans and Stand for Children are ultimately responsible
for Chicago school closings and the recent increase of charter school
applications like the 18-district virtual charter initiated by K12 Inc. in the
Chicago suburbs… SB 79 and HB 5825… created and gave the Illinois Charter
Commission super “override powers” and autonomy from the Illinois State Board
of Education (ISBE). If SB 7 gave education activists concern, SB 79 and HB 5825
should have started a five-alarm fire… K12 Inc. anticipates that the state
charter commission will override local rejections of their taxpayer rip-off
scheme and approve the charter despite overwhelming local opposition.
In Chicago,
Rahm Emanuel took a more direct approach to help out his wealthy friends who
want to replace Chicago public schools with profit-driven charter schools.
Rahm’s unelected school board president, Barbara Byrd-Bennett, announced on March
21st that CPS would be closing 61 public schools. You can bet that
profit-driven charters will be popping up to replace the recently-closed public
schools. The Illinois Charter Commission created by SB 79 will pave the way.
Rahm’s election and appointment of Byrd-Bennett brought this multi-year,
multi-million dollar effort to the 10-yard line.
In a recent In These Times article, Kenzo Shabata explains Byrd-Bennett’s role as
a “cleaner”: "Byrd-Bennett can be thought of as something
of a 'cleaner…' In the school system of the neo-liberal era, the job of the
cleaner is to close as many schools as possible and replace them with charter
schools before the public catches on to the plan.'"
It should
come as no surprise that Byrd-Bennett has connections to the profitable
K12 Inc. According to a Sun-Times profile piece on
Byrd-Bennett: “...She’s served as an adviser to K12, Inc., that Virginia-based
for-profit company that serves up virtual and cyber schools. And she’s been on
the board of Common Core. UNO Charter Schools chief Juan Rangel’s on that,
too.”
…Steans, chairmanship of the Appropriations Committee…, could
easily trade funding for a “yes vote” on SB 79… [H]er influential husband, Leo Smith, is a teacher at Perspectives
Charter School and an ardent advocate for charters. Apparently Smith is a
bit of a bully, as evidenced by his aberrant behavior and the interruption
strategy he employed at a political opponents’ event in 2009 (Read the PSB account).
Over the
course of four years, Steans and Smith donated $100,000 to Rod Blagojevich.
Some have alleged that these contributions influenced her appointment to the
state senate seat she now holds…
The $36,000
that K12 Inc. spent lobbying Springfield lawmakers over the past six years gets
dwarfed by the $1.6M that Stand has spent buying access to
Illinois lawmakers. The biggest investors in the charter school money grab are
all hedge fund managers who have funded their front group, Stand
for Children, a political action committee (PAC) in Illinois. We
know that Stand gets its money from hedge fund managers and financial
investment firms. We also know that Stand
played a critical role in lobbying for SB 79 and HB 5825.
Stand [On]
Children Supporters:
Madison
Dearborn Partners LLC ($750,000), Crown Family ($580,000), Citadel Group
($500,000), Peak 6 Investments ($474,000), Pritzker Family ($250,000), DRW
Trading ($130,000), Merrick Ventures LLC ($100,000), Code Hennessy &
Simmons LLC ($100,000), Options House LLC ($26,000), and Leo Smith ($25,000)
husband of Sen. Heather Steans. Total: $2,935,000.
[“Externalization is legally enshrined in the limited liability corporation (LLC), which cleverly enables risk-taking and pathologically encourages irresponsibility” (The Seven Deadly Sins of Capitalism by Darrin Drda)].
[“Externalization is legally enshrined in the limited liability corporation (LLC), which cleverly enables risk-taking and pathologically encourages irresponsibility” (The Seven Deadly Sins of Capitalism by Darrin Drda)].
…The Steans
family influence peddling to transform [the public] education system into a
profitable business model doesn’t stop with Stand or an appointment to the
Illinois Senate. An issue advocacy group cynically named, Advance
Illinois, is yet another pro-charter group that works with
lawmakers to craft legislation like SB 79 and HB 5825. (Do you remember Advance Illinois' push for SB 7?] It
should come as no surprise that the organization is run by Robin Steans,
Heather’s sister.
It should also come as no surprise to anyone that financial supporters of Advance
Illinois are mega-millionaires and foundations connected to
businesses seeking to make money off of profit-driven charters… Some of Advance
Illinois Supporters include the Steans Family Foundation, JP Morgan Chase
Foundation, CME Group Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Robert
R. McCormack Foundation, and others…
A flaw in
SB 79 didn’t allow the new charter commission to receive funding from ISBE.
[However], Stand for Children, Steans, and State
Representative Linda Chapa LaVia used HB 5825 to fix this oversight. After
HB 5825 passed the House on March 28, 2012, Heather Steans added two
significant amendments to the bill and passed it through the senate on May
22. The bill was sent back to Chapa LaVia’s committee after she filed Steans'
two amendments. With the pension issue dominating discussions, the bill was
temporarily stalled. During Veto session (November 2012 - January 2013),
lawmakers pushed HB 5825 through the House Rules Committee, according
to the League of Women Voters.
A new Illinois commission can
authorize charter schools rejected by local officials. Its money comes from a
foundation that backs charter schools.
December 2011
A new government agency could boost the number of
charter schools in Illinois. But the way the agency is financing itself raises
questions. The Illinois State Charter School Commission, created by a law
enacted this summer, can authorize charter schools that fail to win approval of
local school districts. The per-pupil state funding for the charter schools
comes at the expense of the districts. The commission will also monitor the
performance of schools it authorizes.
Despite the commission’s responsibilities, the
state has not provided it any startup money. The only public-funding mechanism
won’t be in place until July [2012], when the commission can begin collecting a
fee from schools it authorizes…
The law that set up the commission allows it to
raise private money. The commission’s sole funding so far is a $50,000 grant
from the Walton Family Foundation, which supports several Illinois charter
school operators and their state trade group.
Told by WBEZ about this financing, Illinois
Federation of Teachers President Dan Montgomery said it created a conflict of
interest. “This is really the rubber hitting the road — why we thought this was
a bad law,” said Montgomery, whose union includes most K-12 teachers in
Chicago. “The state should reconsider this. I don’t think the people of Illinois
would stand for the gaming industry, say, to have the right to reverse a
community’s decision not to allow a race track in its town. I don’t know why we
wouldn’t give at least the same protections to the children of Illinois.”
A spokesman for the Illinois Education Association,
the state’s largest teacher union, echoed Montgomery. But the law’s chief
sponsor, state Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, said providing taxpayer funds
for the commission’s launch would have been unpopular. “It was not going to
make folks happy [to take] dollars away that could be going to the traditional
public schools,” she said.
Other states have allowed charter school
commissions to launch with private funding, Steans said. The Illinois State
Board of Education doesn’t see a conflict with the commission accepting
foundation money, according to board spokeswoman Mary Fergus. “If we had any
information that specific strings were attached to the donation/funding, that
would be a problem,” Fergus said in a statement.
Before the commission’s creation, charter school
operators that failed to win authorization from local school districts could
appeal to ISBE. That state board received dozens of appeals but, according to
Fergus, it reversed a district and authorized a charter school just three
times. Charter schools are independently run but depend on public funds. Most
of their taxpayer support would otherwise go to local school districts…
The nine commission members — recommended by Gov.
Pat Quinn and appointed by ISBE — are already holding official meetings and
overseeing a staff member, [according to] attorney Jeanne Nowaczewski… The money for the
commission’s staffing and other expenses so far comes from the Walton
foundation. That family started Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club. Other recipients of
Walton grants include the Illinois Network of Charter Schools, a statewide
umbrella. The foundation reports that it gave the network more than $1 million
in 2010. Andrew Broy, the network’s president, said the amount for 2011 is
about $950,000. The network also serves as an intermediary — a “fiscal agent”
in nonprofit parlance — for Walton’s funding of the state commission... [Commission
Chairman] Richmond said Nowaczewski receives her paychecks from the network,
not the commission. Richmond acknowledged that the Walton money could create
the perception that the commission has a conflict of interest...
I am a member of the Naperville Community Unit School District 203, one of the communities targeted by IVCS. We considered without action the IVCS proposal at our meeting last night. The proposal was submitted to us in March, thus initiating an official 45-day process, at the end of which we have to make our decision. The first part of the process was the hearing on the submitted proposal, a proposal that included a contract that was not the official contract and was presented by a very unprepared staff member from K12, the for profit education group that is the contractor to IVCS to provide curriculum and management of the charter school. Our administrators provided a list of about 150 questions, which is allowed by statute, and asked for responses by Thursday of that week. We received notification that they would not be able to provide answers by our 1 April meeting--no excuse, no reason, just not providing it. They hope to be able to provide responses by the time we make our decision, 15 April. Here are my comments from last night:
ReplyDeleteClearly, from their complete lack of interest in the charter guidelines and the process as defined by state law, the Illinois Virtual Charter School (IVCS) believes that it does not need to work with the Board and staff of school districts. Their lack of participation in this process, as evidenced by sending an unprepared staff member from their "contracting" organization, their unwillingness to respond to questions and the fact that they didn't even send us the real contract to consider, seems to indicate that they are either not really interested in working in Illinois or they believe that there is another way that they can receive their charter.
In fact, there is. The Illinois Charter School Commission, a group that is under the Illinois State Board of Education, but not answerable to it nor to any other authority, has the ability to override the decisions of school districts when it comes to charter schools. In addition, keep in mind that K12, the for profit education group, has given, according to one source, $36,000 in contributions to Illinois lawmakers in the past six years.
Please understand that the Illinois Charter School Commission has the ability to tell our school district that we must pay money to a charter school--money that does not come from the state or from the Illinois Charter School Commission--but from our local taxpayers through their property taxes. The Illinois Charter School Commission, an unelected group of individuals from around the state of Illinois, not from Naperville, has the ability to override the decisions of locally elected officials, your school board members, representing the values and priorities of your community, to take money from your students and your schools to pay a for profit company to provide education that has not in any way proven to be superior than what is provided by your district.
I think this is a shameful circumstance, and I encourage all of the people who have contacted us to contact their local legislators, the Governor, and members of the Illinois State Board of Education and the Illinois Charter School Commission to tell them what they think of this situation. I know I will.