On the November Ballot, Illinois voters will be asked if they believe the Illinois Constitution should be amended to require a three-fifths majority vote in order to increase a benefit under any public pension or retirement system. Please vote NO on Michael Madigan's proposed Constitutional Amendment (HJRCA 49). This Constitutional Amendment would also require that any local collectively-bargained agreement be approved by a three-fifths majority if those agreements had incentives or additional compensation increases beyond salary.
Reasons to VOTE NO:
--It is
mostly the legislators’ fault that the pension systems were poorly funded
throughout the decades. That diverted pension money was used for other state
services and legislators’ “pet” projects instead;
--The
constitutional amendment will make
public employees’ ability to fight for fair contracts much harder (Illinois
Education Association, IEA);
--This
constitutional amendment will limit the
bargaining power of employers and employees (IEA);
--There is the
possibility of disagreement on what constitutes a benefit increase” (Jesse White, Secretary of State). The COLA and other “earned” benefits will most likely be reinterpreted
in this regard;
--This
constitutional amendment would make it nearly impossible to remedy the Social Security issues with the passage of
Senate Bill 1946 in April, 2010 (IEA).
This is unfair to any new teachers hired after January 1, 2011;
--This
constitutional amendment will make it harder
to attract the best possible college candidates for the teaching profession (IEA);
--This constitutional
amendment “does not reduce the state’s
pension systems’ current $83 billion unfunded liability” (caused primarily by
the state’s legislators); “it fails to address the real fiscal issue caused by
the state’s outsized pension debt—how to amortize the $83 billion debt owed
to the pension systems” (Center for Tax and Budget Accountability);
--Most significantly, as stated by the State Universities
Annuitants Association (SUAA), this constitutional amendment “would grant unprecedented powers to
government that will undermine protections contained in the pension protection
clause [Article XIII, Section 5] and eliminate
the uniform laws that now exist for [all] state employee benefits and obligations in the Illinois Pension
Code” (Letter from SUAA, April 25, 2012);
Note: if you do not vote at all,
your absent vote will make it easier for a majority “Yes” vote.
The question on the
November ballot will ask, “…If you believe the Illinois Constitution should
not be amended to require a three-fifths majority vote in order to increase
a benefit under any public pension or retirement system, you should vote NO… on
the question. Three-fifths of those voting on the question or a majority of
those voting in the election must vote “Yes” in order for the amendment to
become effective on January 9, 2013.” Please join us in voting NO against
the proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot.
Thank you from Dave Madsen, Glen Brown
Thank you from Dave Madsen, Glen Brown
For More Information: http://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2012/06/house-joint-resolution-constitutional.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.