Well, the Chicago Tribune is at it
again, trying to find some way to fuel an irrational and emotive fire under you
and your presence in Springfield on August 17th to pass a form of HB1447
without really thinking about the legal complexities, disregarding the legal
costs/outcomes, and including additional state pension systems to what was
originally an anemic house bill.
I am reminded of the lines from “A
Christmas Story” when the young and foolish narrator explains the intricacies
of trying to avoid the consequences of a escaping the critical double-dog–dare-you. The Tribune says that you will pass the
lesser form of HB1447 because you will be thinking - and these are their words: “We are trying to cover our fannies in an
election year by telling you we drove to Springfield and fixed this pension
mess you voters kept telling us to fix” (Reform Lite? Not Enough. Chicago Tribune. 10 August 2012).
Maybe you should think about the
following, more rational points instead of the Tribune’s constant and strident
blaring:
· HB1447
will constitute a necessary legal battle over Article XIII, Section 5 of the
Illinois Constitution. Do you want to
include all the other public unions in what will become a pitched battle?
· The
Tribune loves to talk about the impossibility of paying the $83 billion to the
public pension groups. Of course, that’s
a specious way of ignoring that the real annual payment is much less – $800
million for TRS – in a year. They
exploit the public’s fear, but real answers would come in restructuring the
debt service of the $83 billion the state owes TRS and the other four pension
systems. Why not ask that question? Why not start there?
· The
Tribune tells you that offering a choice between healthcare and a COLA is an
acceptable manner of reducing costs promised for both items. This would not be “consideration or choice”
in any court. It is simply
coercion.
· The
Tribune also warns that not including all the public workers (SERS, GARS, JRS,
TRS, and SURS) will leave “Illinois saddled.”
In fact, the Tribune reminds us that these items, if passed, would only
be “a baby step up Mount Kilimanjaro.”
As long as the General Assembly holds to the ridiculous 1995 ramp-up for
bills unpaid to public employees over the last 60 years, there will never be
enough to satisfy the problem. A
different form of revenue stream needs to be looked at, a stream that allows
for $Billions more in state revenue – a graduated tax system. That will take serious forward thinking and
the kind of statesmanship not seen by the people in this state for some time –
maybe after election?
· Will
the General Assembly dissemble the economic machine that provides nearly $4.5
billion in purchasing in the State of Illinois by cutting benefits? Do you believe that significant cuts to the
economic operation will assist in the recovery of the economy?
· Finally,
the Tribune warns that “Incumbents don’t want to inflame the influential blocs
of voters…” We have given our honest
industry and energy to the betterment of this state in order to make it a
better place to live. We have forgone
Social Security and done what was asked and demanded, and more. You think we’re not already inflamed?
Sincerely,
John Dillon
Also read http://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2012/08/any-assault-on-public-employees-rights.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.