"...Trump
is going to see – and feel – the establishment and media respect he craves, the
sensations of strength he most lacks, by dropping bombs. Every person, let
alone Trump, would be tempted to keep pursuing war as a result of this warped
incentive framework. Indeed, Trump himself has long been aware of this
motivation as he accused Obama in 2012 of preparing to start a new war in
response to falling poll numbers...
"Indeed,
Democratic Party leaders have explicitly praised Trump’s bombing. They will
have to continue to do so even if Trump expands this war. That’s what the
Democratic Party has turned itself into to; indeed, it’s what it has been for a
long time...
"As
it always does, the U.S. media last night was an almost equal mix of excitement
and reverence as the bombs fell. People who dissent from this bombing campaign
– who opposed it on the merits – were almost entirely disappeared, as they
always are in such moments of high patriotism...
"It
should be startling and infuriating that Trump is able to order a new attack on
the Syrian Government without any democratic debate, let alone Congressional
approval...
"What
happened to all the warnings about Trump’s towering incompetence and core evil?
Where are all the grave predictions that he’s leading the world on a path of
authoritarianism, fascism and blood and soil nationalism? They all gave way to
War Fever...
"[H]ere
is Trump – less than three months after being inaugurated – bombing one of the
Kremlin’s closest allies, in a country where Russia has spent more than a year
fighting to preserve his government. Will any of this undermine or dilute the
conspiracy theory that the Kremlin controls the White House? Of course not.
Warped conspiracy theorists are not only immune to evidence that disproves
their theories but, worse, find ways to convert such evidence into further
proof of their conspiracies...
"If
humanitarianism is what motivated the U.S. in Syria, it would take in massive
numbers of refugees, but it hasn’t. If humanitarianism is what motivated the
U.S. bombing of Libya, it would have given large amounts of aid to that country
in the aftermath to help it deal with the ensuing anarchy and misery, but it
didn’t. That’s because humanitarianism is the pretext for U.S. wars, not the
actual motive...
"Those
who oppose Trump’s new bombing campaign – or any U.S. bombing campaign – are
instantly met with the predictable objection: we must 'Do Something' about
Syria. This mentality is predicated on a terribly false, and terribly
dangerous, premise: that the U.S. military can and should solve every world
evil...
"[T]hose
who insist that the U.S. has a moral obligation to remove Assad or at least
bomb him become tongue-tied when it comes to assessing Obama. If, as many
claim, Assad is our generation’s Hitlerian figure – and recall how many recent
foreign leaders were depicted as The New Hitler when some wanted them attacked
– does that make Obama this generation’s Neville Chamberlain for his refusal to
attack Assad? And does it mean that Trump has acted more morally than Obama by
doing what Obama refused to do?...
"Ultimately,
what is perhaps most depressing about all of this is how, yet again, we see the
paucity of choice offered by American democracy. The leadership of both parties
can barely contain themselves joining together to cheer the latest war. One
candidate – the losing one – ran on a platform of launching this new war, while
the other – the victor – repeatedly vowed to avoid it, only to launch it after
being in office less than 100 days.
"The
one constant of American political life is that the U.S. loves war. Martin
Luther King’s 1967 denunciation of the U.S. as 'the greatest purveyor of
violence in the world today' is more accurate than ever."
For the complete article, "The Spoils of War..." by Glenn Greenwald, click here.