The legacy media don’t get it.
Just because Donald Trump barks out an executive decree does not mean it is the
law of the land. When he insisted that the Defense Department would be renamed
the Department of War, far too many headlines suggested that it was a done
deal. The irresponsible, frankly unserious, billionaire-owned media calls this
“rebranding,” as if a Cabinet agency is a cereal box.
The Defense Department is not a
“brand,” and treating it as such insults the men and women who serve. In the
real world, Trump does not get to name and rename entities established by law.
In this case, the Department of Defense was created by statute in 1947 along with the CIA and the National
Security Council.
“The War Department and Navy
Department merged into a single Department of Defense under the Secretary of
Defense, who also directed the newly created Department of the Air Force.”
No wonder military personnel are
flummoxed. Politico reported, “Many expressed frustration, anger and
downright confusion at the effort, which could cost billions of dollars for a
cosmetic change that would do little to tackle the military’s most pressing
challenges — such as countering a more aggressive alliance of authoritarian
nations.”
Trump would have the taxpayers
shoulder the cost of relabeling “more than 700,000 facilities in 40 countries and all
50 states. … [including] everything from letterhead for six military branches
and dozens more agencies down to embossed napkins in chow halls, embroidered
jackets for Senate-confirmed officials and the keychains and tchotchkes in the
Pentagon store.”
Instead of this nonsense,
just one billion dollars could be used as follows:
- Permanently house all homeless veterans through rapid
rehousing and supportive housing. (The National Alliance to End
Homelessness put the total figure for an estimated 36,000 veterans
experiencing homelessness at $442 million.)
- Pay for childcare for the 840,000 military families
with children for more than half a year. (The Department of Defense
spends $1.79 billion annually on child care.)
- Feed the 1.4 million food insecure veterans for two
months.
- Cover almost half of one Navy Flight III destroyer ship.
- Pay for 11 F-15EX Eagle II fighter jets at $90 million each.
- Pay for about six National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems.
- Pay for healthcare for almost 68,000 veterans for a year.
- Cover the purchase and operation of 5 new intercontinental ballistic missile interceptors.
- Restore the $1 billion Trump stripped from Army barracks
maintenance and renovations to pay for a surge at the Southern
border.
Trump’s resort to window dressing
in lieu of responsible policy making is appalling. As evidenced by him stuffing
the Oval Office with tacky gold knickknacks and choosing Cabinet officials
based on their appearance on his television screen, Trump obsesses over the
superficial (e.g., banishing overweight servicemen from his sight).
Incapable of addressing substance, he resorts to inconsequential decoration and
cringeworthy marketing.
Military honor, code of conduct,
and duty (the actual qualities foundational to military service) are foreign to
the president who ducked military service for spontaneous “bone spurs.” Since he cannot comprehend service, then men
and women who have sacrificed their lives seem to him like “losers” and “suckers.” He cannot grasp that what
matters is in the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Constitution, not
what is on the Pentagon letterhead.
Trump and Defense Secretary
Hegseth’s (oops—is he out of a job, if the department he was confirmed to lead
no longer exists?) insecurity is palpable. Inadequacy masquerading as
hyper-manly infect every utterance and gesture. What they think is “warrior” talk
comes across as little boys play acting. (What’s next—a gaudy faux-military get-up complete with epaulets?) They yearn to project toughness, but their silly
antics (in addition to firing high-ranking women, transgender troops, and
military lawyers) convey just how fragile their egos are.
Even more dangerous, Trump seems
to believe that military toughness equates to unlawful brutality. Any commander
in chief who respects our military would not order our armed forces to engage
in extrajudicial killings on the high seas, which experts
across the board have denounced as blatantly illegal actions that could subject anyone in the chain of command to domestic
and/or international prosecution.
In trying to play tough-guy,
Trump simultaneously endangers and demeans our military, while trivializing
their mission. He can never comprehend what makes the military the greatest in
the world (e.g., valor, self-sacrifice, discipline, honor), as these qualities
are beyond his narcissistic imagination. Whether sending the proficient
National Guard to D.C. to pick up garbage, or to serve as threatening props in
Los Angeles, or to switch signage, Trump wants toy soldiers to play-act; not a
disciplined fighting force tasked with the noble, awesome responsibility to
defend the Constitution.
In an amici brief in the California case brought to
stop Trump’s violations of posse comitatus, a distinguished group of retired military
brass explained the harm to our troops when they are misused:
First, deploying military
personnel in the context of domestic law enforcement diverts them from their
primary mission, which is national security and disaster response, at the
expense of local, state, and national safety.
Second, National Guard personnel
and active-duty Marines are not trained or qualified to conduct domestic law
enforcement operations, which poses a danger to the safety of both the troops
and the public. Third, the use of federal military personnel in the context of
law enforcement operations should be a last resort to avoid the politicization
of the military, which inevitably erodes public trust, impacts recruitment, and
undermines troop morale.
Trump cannot grasp any of this,
nor can he understand the obligations we have to our current and former
military personnel. If he cared one wit about them, Trump would not have fired
hundreds of thousands of government workers (who are disproportionately former
military), nor would he have slashed funding for the Veterans Administration,
drummed out of service trans service personnel serving honorably, or tried to
erase some of the most storied chapters in military history.
So, let’s dispense with the
“rebranding” gibberish and explain what Trump is up to: trying to turn our
armed forces into his cartoon version of a military. The Defense Department
does not change its name because of the ravings of an unstable, unfit president
with a juvenile understanding of military honor—and we must stop treating his
play-acting as an exercise of legitimate authority.
Jennifer Rubin with additional research
contributed by Senior Editor Jamie Riley. The Contrarian is reader-supported.
To assist our work in the court of law and court of public opinion, join our
community of good troublemakers as a free or paid subscriber.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.