Watching Rachel Maddow [the other] night stirred conflicting emotions: I was moved by her unwavering commitment to illuminating the many forms of resistance rising up against Trump’s authoritarian rule and enraged by the cowardice and silence of so many liberals who should know better.
Maddow has been chronicling the growing spirit of
defiance sweeping across the country—against a regime defined by cruelty,
lawlessness, and the systematic dismantling of human dignity. One of the most
chilling examples is Trump’s assault on the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief (PEPFAR), a program credited with saving over 26 million lives in more
than 50 countries. Its destruction will result in the preventable deaths of
millions—a shameless act of medical genocide.
This brutality is not limited to foreign shores. The abduction, incarceration,
and deportation of children, families, and asylum seekers --often without due
process, and always without compassion--reveal a government governed by a
politics of terror. These are not isolated policies; they are manifestations of
a deeper authoritarian project. This is white Christian nationalism on
steroids, largely influenced by Stephan Miller, an acknowledged white
supremacist.
Maddow courageously documents the growing acts of resistance around the United
States, and in doing so she reminds us how urgent and necessary it is to build
collective power in the face of a regime wedded to state terrorism. The hour is
late, and the stakes are nothing less than the survival of our most basic
freedoms and our shared humanity.
But this past Thursday, Maddow hosted Harvard professor Steven Levitsky,
who made the deeply disingenuous claim that resistance to Trump must come from
the powerful—the bankers, the law firms, the elite universities—while
sidelining the very people who have been on the frontlines of resistance: the
workers, educators, young people, and activists who have fought tirelessly, at
great personal cost, to expose and challenge this regime’s cruelty.
At one point, Levitsky dismissed such resistance,
referring to the 'little old ladies demonstrating at Tesla dealerships' as an
example of irrelevant forms of protest. Maddow rolled her eyes and countered,
suggesting that perhaps these demonstrations provided the very backbone for
more 'powerful' figures to speak out.
This kind of liberal naivety/cowardice reveals a profound misunderstanding of
where real change originates in times of struggle—certainly not from the
corridors of power he oddly sees as real sources of resistance. Clearly, no
reading of Howard Zinn here.
Levitsky's elitist view of resistance
ignores the undeniable fact that it’s precisely these grassroots
movements—often demonized and marginalized—that may have forced those at the
top to confront their complicity and, in some cases, recoil from their support
of Trump's fascist agenda. Should the unrepentant and alleged leaders to which
Levitsky refers oppose Trump--the spineless CEOs like Jamie Diamon, Jeff Bezos,
Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Bill Ackman, and others-of course, but that would
be asking a lot from this sycophantic group of enablers.
Let’s not forget who these elites past and present are—the same individuals who
backed the Iraq War, who enabled the financial crash of 2008, who justified the
disastrous War on Terror post-9/11, who supported the current McCarthyite purge
of the universities, and the list of horrors goes on.
They’re the architects of the very conditions that
allowed Trump’s rise. I have far more faith in the men, women, young people,
workers, and all those who continue to stand up and fight back against the
fascism that’s hollowing out our democracy. The latter are going to jail, being
beaten by police, being shipped off to modern day gulags while the rich and
powerful offer interviews on CNN and to the New York Times.
It is not the CEOs, hedge fund managers, or political elites—the very
architects of the nightmare we are living through—who will deliver us from it.
It is the workers, the young, students, the defenders of Palestinian
freedom, the environmental activists, those fighting for racial justice, gender
equality, and a world free from obscene inequality who carry the torch of
resistance and the promise of a different future. To suggest, as Levitsky does,
that the powerful will lead the fight against Trump is not only comic—it is
morally bankrupt.
Levitsky’s response was a shameful act of intellectual retreat. To place faith
in the elite and powerful to fight against the smothering fascist
politics brought to the center of power by the Trump administration is to
abandon the very people who have risked everything to preserve it. When public
intellectuals turn to the ruling class for salvation, they reveal not just
cowardice, but a fundamental betrayal of the spirit of democracy itself. What
hope remains when those entrusted with naming the crisis refuse to see where
its real antidote lies—in the courage of everyday people who dare to resist?
-Henry Giroux
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.