America, can we talk? Let’s just cut the shit for once and
actually talk about what’s going on without blustering and pretending we’re
actually doing a good job at adulting as a country right now. We’re not. We’re
really screwing this whole society thing up, and we have to do better. We don’t
have a choice. People are dying. At this rate, it’s not if your kids, or mine,
are involved in a school shooting, it’s when. One of these happens every 60
hours on average in the US. If you think it can’t affect you, you’re wrong.
Dead wrong. So let’s talk.
I’ll
start. I’m an Army veteran. I like M-4’s, which are, for all practical
purposes, an AR-15, just with a few extra features that people almost never use
anyway. I’d say at least 70% of my formal weapons training is on that exact
rifle, with the other 30% being split between various and sundry machine guns
and grenade launchers. My experience is pretty representative of soldiers of my
era. Most of us are really good with an M-4, and most of us like it at least
reasonably well, because it is an objectively good rifle. I was good with an
M-4, really good. I earned the Expert badge every time I went to the range,
starting in Basic Training. This isn’t uncommon. I can name dozens of other
soldiers/veterans I know personally who can say the exact same thing. This
rifle is surprisingly easy to use, completely idiot-proof really, has next to
no recoil, comes apart and cleans up like a dream, and is light to carry
around. I’m probably more accurate with it than I would be with pretty much any
other weapon in existence. I like this rifle a lot. I like marksmanship as a
sport. When I was in the military, I enjoyed combining these two things as
often as they’d let me.
With
all that said, enough is enough. My knee jerk reaction is to consider weapons
like the AR-15 no big deal because it is my default setting. It’s where my
training lies. It is my normal, because I learned how to fire a rifle IN THE
ARMY. You know, while I may only have shot plastic targets on the ranges of
Texas, Georgia, and Missouri, that’s not what those weapons were designed for,
and those targets weren’t shaped like deer. They were shaped like people.
Sometimes we even put little hats on them. You learn to take a gut shot,
“center mass”, because it’s a bigger target than the head, and also because if
you maim the enemy soldier rather than killing him cleanly, more of his buddies
will come out and get him, and you can shoot them, too. He’ll die of those
injuries, but it’ll take him a while, giving you the chance to pick off as many
of his compadres as you can. That’s how my Drill Sergeant explained it anyway.
I’m sure there are many schools of thought on it. The fact is, though, when I
went through my marksmanship training in the US Army, I was not learning how to
be a competition shooter in the Olympics, or a good hunter. I was being taught
how to kill people as efficiently as possible, and that was never a secret.
As
an avowed pacifist now, it turns my stomach to even type the above words, but
can you refute them? I can’t. Every weapon that a US Army soldier uses has the
express purpose of killing human beings. That is what they are made for. The
choice rifle for years has been some variant of what civilians are sold as an
AR-15. Whether it was an M-4 or an M-16 matters little. The function is the
same, and so is the purpose. These are not deer rifles. They are not target
rifles. They are people killing rifles. Let’s stop pretending they’re not.
With
this in mind, is anybody surprised that nearly every mass shooter in recent US
history has used an AR-15 to commit their crime? And why wouldn’t they? High
capacity magazine, ease of loading and unloading, almost no recoil, really
accurate even without a scope, but numerous scopes available for high
precision, great from a distance or up close, easy to carry, and readily
available. You can buy one at Wal-Mart, or just about any sports store, and
since they’re long guns, I don’t believe you have to be any more than 18 years
old with a valid ID. This rifle was made for the modern mass shooter,
especially the young one. If he could custom design a weapon to suit his
sinister purposes, he couldn’t do a better job than Armalite did with this one
already.
This
rifle is so deadly and so easy to use that no civilian should be able to get
their hands on one. We simply don’t need these things in society at large. I
always find it interesting that when I was in the Army, and part of my job was
to be incredibly proficient with this exact weapon, I never carried one at any
point in garrison other than at the range. Our rifles lived in the arms room,
cleaned and oiled, ready for the next range day or deployment. We didn’t carry
them around just because we liked them. We didn’t bluster on about barracks
defense and our second amendment rights. We tucked our rifles away in the arms
room until the next time we needed them, just as it had been done since the
Army’s inception. The military police protected us from threats in garrison.
They had 9 mm Berettas to carry. They were the only soldiers who carry weapons
in garrison. We trusted them to protect us, and they delivered. With notably
rare exceptions, this system has worked well. There are fewer shootings on Army
posts than in society in general, probably because soldiers are actively
discouraged from walking around with rifles, despite being impeccably well
trained with them. Perchance, we could have the largely untrained civilian
population take a page from that book?
I
understand that people want to be able to own guns. That’s okay. We just need to
really think about how we’re managing this. Yes, we have to manage it, just as
we manage car ownership. People have to get a license to operate a car, and if
you operate a car without a license, you’re going to get in trouble for that.
We manage all things in society that can pose a danger to other people by their
misuse. In addition to cars, we manage drugs, alcohol, exotic animals (there
are certain zip codes where you can’t own Serval cats, for example), and
fireworks, among other things. We restrict what types of businesses can operate
in which zones of the city or county. We have a whole system of permitting for
just about any activity a person wants to conduct since those activities could
affect others, and we realize, as a society, that we need to try to minimize
the risk to other people that comes from the chosen activities of those around
them in which they have no say. Gun ownership is the one thing our country
collectively refuses to manage, and the result is a lot of dead people.
I
can’t drive a Formula One car to work. It would be really cool to be able to do
that, and I could probably cut my commute time by a lot. Hey, I’m a good
driver, a responsible Formula One owner. You shouldn’t be scared to be on the
freeway next to me as I zip around you at 140 MPH, leaving your Mazda in a
cloud of dust! Why are you scared? Cars don’t kill people. People kill people.
Doesn’t this sound like bullshit? It is bullshit, and everybody knows. Not one
person I know would argue non-ironically that Formula One cars on the freeway
are a good idea. Yet, these same people will say it’s totally okay to own the
firearm equivalent because, in the words of comedian Jim Jeffries, “fuck you, I
like guns”.
Yes,
yes, I hear you now. We have a second amendment to the constitution, which must
be held sacrosanct over all other amendments. Dude. No. The constitution was
made to be a malleable document. It’s intentionally vague. We can enact gun
control without infringing on the right to bear arms. You can have your deer
rifle. You can have your shotgun that you love to shoot clay pigeons with. You
can have your target pistol. Get a license. Get a training course. Re-certify at
a predetermined interval. You do not need a military grade rifle. You don’t.
There’s no excuse.
“But
we’re supposed to protect against tyranny! I need the same weapons the military
would come at me with!” Dude. You know where I can get an Apache helicopter and
a Paladin?! Hook a girl up! Seriously, though, do you really think you’d be
able to hold off the government with an individual level weapon? Because you
wouldn’t. One grenade, and you’re toast. Don’t have these illusions of standing
up to the government, and needing military style rifles for that purpose.
You’re not going to stand up to the government with this thing. They’d take you
out in about half a second.
Let’s
be honest. You just want a cool toy, and for the vast majority of people,
that’s all an AR-15 is. It’s something fun to take to the range and put some
really wicked holes in a piece of paper. Good for you. I know how enjoyable
that is. I’m sure for a certain percentage of people, they might not kill
anyone driving a Formula One car down the freeway, or owning a Cheetah as a
pet, or setting off professional grade fireworks without a permit. Some people
are good with this stuff, and some people are lucky, but those cases don’t
negate the overall rule. Military style rifles have been the choice du jour in
the incidents that have made our country the mass shootings capitol of the
world. Formula One cars aren’t good for commuting. Cheetahs are bitey.
Professional grade fireworks will probably take your hand off. All but one of
these are common sense to the average American. Let’s fix that. Be honest, you
don’t need that AR-15. Nobody does. Society needs them gone, no matter how good
you may be with yours. Kids are dying, and it’s time to stop fucking around.
-Anastasia Bernoulli
To read her blog, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.