The
younger you are, the less retirement security you’re likely to have, as
employers accelerate efforts to shed costly pensions and replace them with
alternatives that make workers shoulder more of the risk and responsibility.
Why
it matters: Millennials
and members of Generation Z will face less prosperous golden years than their
parents, given the retirement accounts they get now — unless
they are diligent about allocating money, investing it wisely, and not blowing
it when they gain full access.
The
backstory: Companies
have long been moving away from traditional pensions, where retirees are guaranteed
a certain level of benefits, and replacing them with 401(k)s and other
retirement savings accounts, which are more vulnerable to the ups and downs of
the stock market. But lately, those changes are happening even faster.
What’s
happening: A
perfect storm of circumstances, from lower interest rates to higher longevity
rates, is prompting corporations to offload their pension plans — by selling
them to insurance companies and offering lump-sum payments to some workers.
- Deal volume in
the “pension risk transfer” business, in which a big company like Lockheed
Martin or FedEx sells all or part of its pension obligations to an insurer
like Prudential or Metropolitan Life, was the biggest ever in 2018, and is
on track to be bigger still this year.
- The insurance
company pays retired workers an annuity that is equal in value to the
pension they’ve earned, but the workers lose certain safeguards, like the
backstop of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the agency that
steps in if a company can’t pay.
- “Companies are
looking to get those defined benefit plans off their books,” Robert
Falzon, vice chairman of Prudential, tells Axios.
“It’s a multi-trillion dollar market that will continue for some period of
time.”
If
your pension is sold to an insurance company, there are
“potentially terrible consequences,” Norman Stein, a law professor at Drexel
University and policy advisor to the Pension Rights Center, tells Axios.
· “What
happens if the insurance company gets into trouble?” he said. “What happens if
you find out that your benefit was miscalculated and you’re entitled to more
than the company sold your pension for?”
By
the numbers: Among
Fortune 500 companies, only 81 sponsored a pension plan in 2017, down from 288
in 1998, according to Prudential.
· At
the same time, the number of pension risk transfer deals rose to 493 in 2018
from 203 in 2012, according to the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute, a
nonpartisan research center.
· In
the public sector, many pension plans are dangerously underfunded.
Between
the lines: 401(k)s
and other defined contribution plans are cheaper for the firms than pensions
and more onerous for the employees. Consumer advocates say that the swapping
pensions for 401(k)s is a raw deal for workers — particularly in an
uncertain economy.
· When
the next recession hits, a falling stock market will drive down the value of
401(k) and IRA accounts invested in equities.
· While
pension plans are run by professionals whose fees are paid by the corporate
sponsor, consumers with IRAs or 401(k)s must figure out their own investment
strategies and pay fees.
· Despite
the tax penalties, many consumers raid their 401(k)s to pay pre-retirement
expenses, something they can’t do with a pension.
Unless
you buy an annuity —
which comes with its own plusses and minuses — it’s hard
to know what to do when you reach retirement age and have to parcel out your
savings to last a lifetime.
· “A
lot of people don’t know what to do with a lump sum,” Chantel Sheaks, executive
director of retirement policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, tells Axios.
Silver
lining: For
younger people, who are less likely to stay at the same job for decades, a
401(k) or IRA can offer more flexibility.
The
bottom line: Despite
these issues, people with either a defined benefit or a defined contribution
plan from their employer should consider themselves lucky.
· A
quarter of non-retired Americans had no retirement savings or
pension in 2018, according to the Federal Reserve, while “six in 10
non-retirees who hold self-directed retirement savings accounts, such as a
401(k) or IRA, have little or no comfort in managing their
investments.”
Companies are racing to dump their pension plans by Jennifer A. Kingston
A Defined-Benefit Pension Plan:
ReplyDelete1) You cannot outlive your benefit;
2) Your defined-benefit pension plan is more cost efficient than the defined-contribution savings plan;
3) Your defined-benefit pension plan offers predictable, guaranteed monthly benefits for life;
4) Funds are invested by professional asset managers in a diversified portfolio that follows long-term investment strategies;
5) The large-pooled assets reduce asset management and miscellaneous fees;
6) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides spousal (survivor) financial benefits;
7) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides disability benefits;
8) The state is responsible for funding, investment, inflationary and longevity risks;
9) Because you are not affected by Market volatility, your defined-benefit pension plan is a more effective protection than the defined-contribution savings plan;
10) Because teachers understand the value of such a plan, they are willing to give up higher wages;
11) A defined-benefit plan encourages a long-term career and stable workforce;
12) Your defined-benefit pension plan provides you with self-sufficiency in retirement; it is associated with far fewer households that experience food privation, shelter adversity and health-care hardship;
13) Your defined-benefit pension plan is less expensive for taxpayers than Social Security – a reason why legislators, et al. had negotiated for Illinois teachers to not pay into Social Security.