“Woke up too
early in the morning thinking about the book I am writing, as we do. But my
thoughts drifted to the Kavanaugh job interview for Supreme Court justice and
how he was trying to make his case to a public that can't directly answer back.
“One thing struck
me as dangerously disingenuous, the claim to virginity and the idea that he
couldn't have desired to assault women because implicitly at the time he valued
the sanctity of marriage and his own sexual innocence too highly.
“The idea that
abstinence education and his own commitment as a young man to being a virgin
would protect women by either absolving him of, or removing for him, the desire
to have sex with women is not just wrong, but dangerous. I don't need to go
into why this is so for those of you here.
“I want to be
clear about this, however. That Kavanaugh referenced this aspect of his life as
a defense against the claims of sexual assault means he is signaling his
commitment to a very conservative far right evangelical politics regarding
gender and sexuality.
“This isn't
someone who thinks contraception should be available before marriage, or that
health care employment benefits should include the cost of birth control. This
is an interview for a job that would, however, have his ideas about sex,
marriage, and women as important qualifiers for his suitability for the
position. There is also the question of how he views his faith in relation to
the law.
“I wonder how he
perceives the women in his life, but everything he signaled in his interview is
that he is just like Mike Pence. This isn't to criticize Kavanaugh as an
individual, he can have whatever view of women, sexual intimacy, and health
care provision he wants as a private citizen.
“But this is an
interview for a job as Supreme Court Justice of the United States. Even if you
agree with his views on faith and personal service, given that he was willing
to make a case for his suitability for the position on the basis of a
commitment to this conservative religion faith should give you pause and
consider what the office of Supreme Court Justice requires.
“He is claiming
that these values are the qualifications that we should consider when
confirming him. He is offering up the claim that we should consider his
attestation of the strength of his faith when young as proof that not only is
he innocent, his word and values set against those of his accusers who are of
course not in the room as he says this, but that he will faithfully continue to
demonstrate these values and commitments when a Supreme Court Justice. These
are the words of a politician and not those of a Supreme Court Justice.
“This is a job
interview for public service as a Justice, not someone standing in front of the
congregation in a church discussing their constancy and faith as a personal
struggle. No matter your personal views and values, someone who is willing to
claim—no argue—in public that his religious views make him the best candidate
as a Justice isn't someone we should choose for the position.
“Not unless we
want to change that part of the Constitution that states that we should have
the freedom to choose our individual faith and religion. He is using his faith
as a weapon, and thinks that to do so is not only appropriate with regard to
claims made against him personally of sexual assault, but qualifying for the
appointment to the highest Court in the land.
“I keep coming
back this morning to the words of a student who was in my office years ago
describing her survival as a victim of sexual assault when she was a first year
student, ‘I was saving myself for marriage, and I woke up in this man's bed who
I didn't know, and couldn't remember how I got there... How do I find out now
my sense of who I want to be? He took that from me.’
“This man who was
drinking and partying as a high school student, writing about sexual conquest
in his yearbook, and continued partying as a college student, and no doubt also
as a lawyer and judge, is lying and doing so in public on his faith. Instead of
showing remorse and sympathy for the victims of his transgressions, he became
righteous. Shameful. Dangerous”—Utz Mcknight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.